We Have Learned That Organizational Change Is A Process Rath ✓ Solved

We have learned that organizational change is a process rather than an event

Organizational change is a complex, multi-phase process that evolves over time, rather than a singular event. Effective change management requires a systematic approach to identify what needs to change, determine how to implement the change, and establish the appropriate timing for intervention. Over the past three years, several organizations in Saudi Arabia have undergone significant transformations, reflecting the dynamic economic and social shifts within the region. This essay explores one such organization, examining its background, reasons for change, the process undertaken, the theoretical frameworks employed, stakeholder involvement, and strategies' outcomes. The analysis aims to provide insights into successful organizational change practices and propose recommendations grounded in change management theories to facilitate future initiatives.

Organization Overview and Rationale for Change

The Saudi Arabian National Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) is one of the world's largest integrated oil and gas companies, playing a vital role in the country’s economy. Over recent years, driven by Vision 2030’s diversification goals, Saudi Aramco has sought to transition from being solely an oil producer to a broader energy and chemical enterprise. Between 2020 and 2022, Aramco executed a major organizational change involving restructuring its subsidiaries, expanding into renewable energy projects, and reducing its workforce in certain sectors to optimize operations. This strategic shift was motivated by the need to adapt to global energy transition trends, enhance competitiveness, and support Saudi Arabia’s economic diversification agenda. The change aimed to position the company as a sustainable energy provider while maintaining its profitability and global market share.

The Change Process: Steps and Frameworks

The process initiated by Saudi Aramco reflected a structured change management approach, consistent with Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model, which emphasizes establishing urgency, forming guiding coalitions, creating and communicating visions, empowering action, and anchoring new approaches (Kotter, 1995). The organization conducted comprehensive internal assessments to recognize the necessity for change, emphasizing the risks posed by over-reliance on fossil fuels and the opportunities within renewables.

Following the recognition phase, Aramco formed cross-functional teams to develop a detailed change vision, engaging senior leadership and key regulators to build strategic alliances. Communicating the vision transparently to employees and stakeholders was central to securing buy-in. The organization then implemented phased restructuring, focusing on operational efficiencies and integrating renewable energy projects into its portfolio. Throughout this process, continuous feedback and adjustment were integral to ensure the change initiatives stayed aligned with strategic objectives.

From the perspective of organizational theory, the company appears to have applied the Organizational Intelligence Model (Falletta & Combs, 2018), emphasizing adaptive capacity, data-driven decision-making, and stakeholder collaboration. This framework facilitated real-time assessments of change impact, enabling smoother transitions and minimizing resistance. Stakeholders—employees, government authorities, investors, and industry partners—were actively involved at various stages, with employees participating in change communication sessions and stakeholders contributing strategic insights, thereby fostering collective ownership of the change process.

Successes, Challenges, and Recommendations

Strategically, Aramco's successful strategies included transparent communication, phased implementation, and stakeholder engagement. These approaches fostered trust and minimized resistance, enabling smoother transitions. The company’s focus on aligning change initiatives with national economic goals also reinforced stakeholder support. However, challenges arose in managing employee adaptation to restructuring and layoffs, which occasionally caused morale issues. Furthermore, the complexity of integrating renewable energy projects required advanced technical capabilities that initially lagged expectations. These setbacks highlight the necessity for a comprehensive change management framework that addresses both technical and human dimensions.

Based on insights gained from change management literature, particularly Bhatt (2019), a more participative approach involving employees at early stages could enhance commitment and reduce resistance. Additionally, the application of Lewin's Change Model—unfreezing current behaviors, implementing change, and refreezing new practices—might have provided clearer intermediate steps to facilitate organizational stability. Collaboration within cross-sector partnerships, as discussed by Van Tulder and Keen (2018), could further strengthen the capacity for adaptive change, offering a more nuanced understanding of inter-organizational dynamics.

In future change initiatives, I recommend Saudi Aramco employ strategic frameworks such as the Organizational Intelligence Model combined with Lewin’s three-stage approach to better manage both technical and people issues. Moreover, fostering a culture of continuous learning and resilience, supported by robust communication and participative decision-making, will be critical for navigating ongoing industry disruptions and maintaining competitive advantage.

Conclusion

Saudi Aramco's recent organizational change exemplifies how systematic processes, stakeholder involvement, and adaptive frameworks can facilitate successful transformation in a complex industry environment. Recognizing that change is a process involving multiple phases is pivotal to achieving sustained organizational success. By applying comprehensive change management models and emphasizing employee engagement, the organization can better prepare for future challenges and capitalize on emerging opportunities. As the global energy landscape evolves, continuous learning and strategic agility will remain vital for organizations like Saudi Aramco to thrive in dynamic economic and technological contexts.

References

• Bhatt, P. (2019). Employees’ perception about change in jobs and organisational orientations. International Journal of Employment Studies, 27(1), 34–63.
• Falletta, S., & Combs, W. (2018). The Organizational Intelligence Model in context: A comparative analysis and case profile. OD Practitioner, 50(1), 22–29.
• Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59–67.
• Van Tulder, R., & Keen, N. (2018). Capturing collaborative challenges: Designing complexity-sensitive theories of change for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 315–332.
• Alqahtani, A. (2020). Strategic change management in Saudi organizations: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Organization and Management, 12(4), 245–262.
• Alshammari, Y., & Daghfous, N. (2021). Implementing renewable energy initiatives in Saudi Arabia: Organizational perspectives and challenges. Energy Policy, 147, 111861.
• Sultana, N., & Anwar, S. (2019). Change management practices in Middle Eastern firms: An empirical view. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(12), 1–15.
• Mohammed, A. & Salem, S. (2022). The impact of organizational restructuring on employee morale: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Management Science Letters, 12(2), 1275–1284.
• Khan, M., & Patel, P. (2019). Cross-cultural considerations in organizational change: Insights from Saudi Arabia. Asian Journal of Business and Management, 7(4), 54–62.
• Alharbi, S. (2020). Strategic adaptation and innovation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A review of recent reforms. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 17(3), 2050013.