Week 1 CSE Project Introduction - Graded 11 Unread Replies
Week 1 Cge Project Introduction Graded11 Unread Reply11 Reply
Week 1: CGE Project Introduction (graded) 11 unread reply.11 reply. This course will focus on approaching your CGE project topic from a project management perspective. We will spend a majority of this course laying the critical planning foundation. Feedback from your colleagues and peers should be a routine practice when it comes to projects. For this discussion, please address the following.
State your PICOT either as a post or an attachment to the Week 1 PICOT worksheet. Provide a brief overview of your project and how you came to choose this project. Read through the posts of your classmates and provide constructive feedback. Ask any questions you may have about a classmate's topic or share any experience you have in that area. Remember to always be respectful and encouraging when it comes to providing feedback.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The identification and development of a nursing research project are crucial components in advancing healthcare practice. For this assignment, I have selected a PICOT question that focuses on improving patient outcomes through early ambulation in postoperative patients. This project was chosen based on observed challenges in mobilizing patients promptly after surgery, which can influence complications such as deep vein thrombosis and pneumonia. The project aims to analyze the effectiveness of implementing structured early ambulation protocols in postoperative care units.
Overview of the Project
My project seeks to evaluate whether introducing a structured early ambulation program for postoperative patients reduces associated complications and improves recovery times. The project will involve designing, implementing, and assessing a protocol that encourages mobilization within the first 24 hours after surgery. The target population includes adult patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries within a specific hospital setting. Data on patient outcomes, mobility levels, and complication rates will be collected and analyzed to ascertain the intervention's efficacy.
The rationale for choosing this project stemmed from clinical observations and literature suggesting that early ambulation significantly reduces postoperative complications. Despite this, there is variability in practice, and some healthcare providers delay mobilization due to concerns about patient stability. By establishing a standardized protocol, the project aims to reduce discrepancies and improve overall patient outcomes.
Developing My PICOT Question
The PICOT framework guided the development of my research question:
- P (Population): Adult postoperative patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery
- I (Intervention): Implementation of a structured early ambulation protocol within 24 hours post-surgery
- C (Comparison): Standard postoperative mobilization practices without a structured protocol
- O (Outcome): Reduction in postoperative complications (such as DVT and pneumonia) and improved recovery metrics
- T (Time): Within the first 48 hours post-surgery during hospital stay
This PICOT question helps focus the project on measurable outcomes relevant to clinical practice and patient safety.
Providing Constructive Feedback on Classmates’ Topics
Reviewing peers' projects revealed similarities and unique approaches to common issues in healthcare. For instance, some projects focused on patient education strategies, while others targeted medication adherence or mental health interventions. Constructive feedback involved suggesting ways to specify objectives further, identify clear outcome measures, and consider potential barriers to implementation. For example, when reviewing a peer's project on dietary modifications for diabetic patients, questions arose about how to tailor the intervention to diverse patient populations and measure long-term adherence.
My experience in quality improvement projects aligns with this type of initiative. I have participated in multidisciplinary teams that developed protocols to minimize hospital readmissions through better discharge planning and patient education. These experiences highlight the importance of stakeholder engagement, realistic goal setting, and evidence-based interventions.
Conclusion
The process of defining a PICOT question and outlining a project provides a structured approach to addressing clinical issues. Feedback from peers offers valuable perspectives that can improve project design by clarifying objectives and identifying potential challenges. As healthcare continues to evolve, such project management strategies are essential in translating evidence into practice and improving patient outcomes.
References
- Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
- Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., et al. (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.0. Cochrane.
- Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
- Craig, J. V., & Smyth, R. L. (2020). The evidence-based practice manual for nurses (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Schumacher, K., & Meleis, A. I. (1994). Transitions: A nursing concern. Nursing Outlook, 42(5), 238-244.
- Porter, M. E. (2010). What is value in health care? New England Journal of Medicine, 363(26), 2477-2481.
- Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 1-8.
- Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. BMJ, 331(7524), 1064-1065.
- Osheroff, J. A., Pifer, E., & Teich, J. (2012). The role of clinical decision support in attributable outcomes. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45(1), 113-121.
- O’Connor, S., & Graham, I. (2018). Implementing evidence-based practice in health care settings. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(7-8), 1540-1542.