Week 1 HR Case Assignment: New HR Strategy For Lloyds

Week 1 Hr Case Assignmentcase 1new Hr Strategy Makes Lloyds A Best

Week 1: HR Case Assignment Case 1 New HR Strategy Makes Lloyd's a "Best Company" Read the Case. Then, answer all of the questions at the end of the case. Case 2 Misplaced Affections: Discharge for Sexual Harassment Read the Case Study entitled, “Misplaced Affections: Discharge for Sexual Harassment” on pages in Chapter 3 (Case Study 2). Then, answer all of the questions at the end of the case. I selected the most interesting and applicable cases for the class.

Please be sure to back up your answers to both of these cases with facts from the textbook. Please number each of your answers. This is very important so that I understand which questions you are responding to. Remember, it is quality that counts so be brief, thorough, and to the point. Good Luck!

Please be sure to back up your answers to both of these cases with facts from the textbook (please use APA format). Your case reports should have a minimum of 1000 words combined (500 words each). Please submit your case reports as Word documents (or both case reports as one Word document). Please number each of your answers, so that I understand which questions you are responding to. Please upload your assignment (by clicking Week 1 HR Case Assignment BELOW then Browse My Computer) in a Word document by Sunday 11:59 PM Eastern Time.

Paper For Above instruction

The upcoming assignment entails a comprehensive analysis of two distinct HR case studies: the first involving Lloyds' implementation of a new HR strategy that positions it as a "best company," and the second examining the circumstances of a discharge due to sexual harassment, entitled “Misplaced Affections.” The purpose of this task is to critically evaluate each case, applying theoretical and practical HR principles supported by textbook evidence, with an emphasis on clear, concise, and well-supported responses. The goal is to produce a combined total of at least 1000 words, with roughly 500 words dedicated to each case, ensuring thorough coverage of the questions posed at the end of each case.

In approaching the Lloyds case, students should analyze the strategic HR initiatives that contributed to the company’s reputation improvement. This involves exploring the specific HR practices implemented, such as talent acquisition, employee engagement, training, or leadership development, and assessing how these practices aligned with organizational goals to foster a positive work environment and strong corporate culture. Students should use textbook concepts and frameworks—such as strategic HR management, organizational behavior, or change management—to support their analysis and demonstrate understanding of how HR strategy enhances organizational performance.

In the second case concerning sexual harassment, students need to evaluate the circumstances surrounding the discharge, considering legal, ethical, and organizational perspectives. This involves analyzing the incident, the company’s response, and the potential implications for HR policy and workplace culture. Textbook theories related to employment law, workplace ethics, and harassment prevention should underpin the analysis, emphasizing how HR professionals can develop effective policies and procedures to prevent such issues and handle allegations appropriately.

Throughout the paper, it is crucial to cite relevant textbook material in APA format, thereby demonstrating evidence-based reasoning and supporting your evaluations. Clear and logical structuring of responses, along with proper spelling and grammar, will enhance the clarity and professionalism of the submission. Remember, each answer should be numbered to correspond explicitly with each question from the case studies, facilitating easy comprehension and assessment of your understanding.

The final document should be submitted as a Word file, containing both case responses, in a single file or as two appended sections, by the designated deadline. Following these guidelines will ensure that your assignment meets academic standards and earns maximum points under the grading criteria—thoroughness, use of course material, and writing quality.

References

• Dessler, G. (2020). Human Resource Management (16th ed.). Pearson.
• Snape, R. (2017). The Employment Law Review. Law Society Publishing.
• Stone, R. J., & Deadrick, D. L. (2015). Challenges and Opportunities Affecting the Future of Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 139–145.
• Groysberg, B., & Abrahams, R. (2014). The Talent Asset Winter Is Coming. Harvard Business Review, 92(6), 84-92.
• Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). The Search for Global Competencies: In Search of a New General Theory of HRM. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 103-113.
• Feldman, D. C., & Ng, T. W. (2013). Careers in Organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 631-652.
• Redman, T., & Wilkinson, A. (2020). Contemporary Human Resource Management: Text and Cases (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Dietz, G., & Kleinmann, M. (2014). Do Self-Endorsed Attitudes Influence Helpful Behavior? An Analysis of How Attitude Endorsement Affects Behaviors Toward Others. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 574-585.
• Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2020). Do Inclusive Leaders Help or Hurt Diversity and Inclusion? The Role of Leader Self-Awareness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(1), 1-17.
• Luddington, G. (2019). Workplace Harassment and the Legal Implications for HR. HR Magazine, 64(3), 33-37.