Week 11 Reflective Essay On Shared Leadership And Communicat
Week 11 Reflective Essay Fconsider Shared Leadership And Complexit
Week 11 – Reflective Essay F. Consider shared leadership and complexity leadership. How do these theories change or deepen your understanding of your own leadership style and philosophy? For example, what are your thoughts about leadership being distributed throughout a human system? What are your reactions to the idea that leadership is not about people, but the spaces between people in human interaction?
Paper For Above instruction
Leadership theories continually evolve, offering new perspectives that challenge traditional views and expand our understanding of effective leadership. Among these, shared leadership and complexity leadership stand out as paradigms that emphasize collaboration, adaptability, and the interconnected nature of human organizations. Reflecting on these theories has significantly deepened my comprehension of leadership, shifting from a leader-centric view to one that recognizes the distributed and relational aspects of leadership within systems.
Shared leadership is rooted in the idea that leadership is not confined to a single individual with formal authority but is distributed across team members, depending on context, expertise, and the needs of a situation (Pearce & Conger, 2003). This approach fosters collective responsibility, enhances flexibility, and leverages diverse skills within a human system. For instance, in my own leadership philosophy, I now see the importance of empowering others to lead in specific domains, creating a dynamic environment where leadership is fluid and contingent on expertise rather than titles. This perspective encourages a more participative and inclusive approach, where followers are also contributors to leadership processes. It challenges the traditional top-down paradigm and emphasizes shared accountability, which can lead to more innovative and resilient organizations.
Complexity leadership further expands this understanding by recognizing organizations as complex adaptive systems (Uhl-Bien, Marion, & McKelvey, 2007). This theory suggests that leadership emerges through interactions within the system, rather than solely from designated leaders. It underscores the importance of adaptability, emergence, and the nonlinear dynamics that characterize real-world organizations. My own leadership philosophy aligns with this view by highlighting agility, openness to change, and the capacity to navigate unpredictability. Complexity leadership shifts focus from directive authority to fostering conditions that enable emergence—encouraging networks of collaboration and shared influence that adapt to changing circumstances.
These theories collectively deepen my understanding by emphasizing relational spaces and interactions over individual attributes. I resonate strongly with the idea that leadership is not solely about people holding roles but about the spaces—the interactions, conversations, and relationships—that facilitate influence and change (Raelin, 2016). This perspective underscores the importance of cultivating environments where human interactions are intentional and catalytic for leadership. It invites a more democratic view of leadership, where influence flows through the relational fabric of human systems, rather than being concentrated in individuals.
My reaction to the notion that leadership is located not in individuals but in the spaces between people aligns with a more human-centered and systems-thinking approach. It challenges traditional hierarchies and encourages viewing human interaction as the heart of leadership processes. This concept inspires me to focus on facilitating meaningful connections, fostering collaboration, and creating conditions for emergent leadership within groups. It also amplifies the importance of emotional intelligence, active listening, and presence in leadership practice, as these qualities nurture the intangible but vital 'spaces' where leadership can emerge naturally.
In conclusion, integrating shared leadership and complexity leadership into my understanding has transformed my leadership philosophy from a focus on individual authority to an appreciation of distributed influence and relational dynamics. These theories highlight the importance of fostering collaborative environments and navigating the complexities inherent in human systems. Recognizing that leadership resides in the spaces among people motivates me to cultivate relational, adaptable, and inclusive leadership practices that resonate with the realities of complex organizational life.
References
Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Sage Publications.
Raelin, J. A. (2016). Imagine There’s No Leader: Reframing Leadership to Include Collective Voice. Leadership Quarterly, 27(2), 226–242.
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the performers to the shapers of complex systems. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 9(4), 2–12.
Heifetz, R. A., & Laurie, D. L. (1997). The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 124–134.
Uhl-Bien, M., & Marion, R. (2008). Complexity Leadership: Enabling people and organizations for adaptability. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 139-150.
Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(1), 25-56.
Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). The allure of toxic leaders: Why followers accept maladaptive leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 34(4), 382-392.
Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2017). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. Leadership Quarterly, 28(4), 421-439.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency.