Week 2 Assignment: Conflict Resolution Model Submission

Week 2 Assignment Conflict Resolution Model Submissionthis Week You

This week, you will identify the conflict resolution model for your research paper. To gain a more complete understanding, refer to the assignment details above and instructions before beginning this assignment. Compose a one- to two-page paper that addresses the following: A description of the model The reason you selected this model over others Format, cite, and reference according to APA Style. To assist you, download the Conflict Resolution Table. (use the link for the table) List of Conflict Models( you can selected the model you want use from here) The Circle of Conflict model The Triangle of Satisfaction model The Boundary model The Interests/Rights/Power model The Dynamics of Trust model The Dimensions of Conflict model The Social Styles model

Paper For Above instruction

Conflict resolution models are essential tools in understanding and addressing disagreements within organizations, communities, or personal relationships. For this paper, I have selected the "Circle of Conflict" model due to its comprehensive approach to analyzing the diverse elements that contribute to conflict and its emphasis on understanding perspectives, feelings, and complexities involved in any dispute.

The Circle of Conflict model, developed by Peter T. Coleman, conceptualizes conflict as a multi-layered phenomenon consisting of core issues, perceptions, emotions, and various external factors. Unlike linear models that view conflict as straightforward, the Circle of Conflict acknowledges the interconnectedness and cyclical nature of conflicts. It emphasizes that resolving disagreements requires addressing not just surface-level issues but also the underlying perceptions and emotional components that often sustain the conflict over time.

The reason I selected the Circle of Conflict over other models, such as the Triangle of Satisfaction or the Interests/Rights/Power models, is because of its holistic approach. While the Triangle of Satisfaction focuses primarily on balancing needs and expectations, and the Interests/Rights/Power model centers on the sources of leverage in a dispute, the Circle of Conflict provides a broader perspective that incorporates emotional dimensions and perceptions. This makes it particularly useful in organizational settings where conflicts are often rooted in misunderstandings, values, and emotional responses, which must be addressed to facilitate meaningful resolution.

The format of this paper follows APA Style, with proper citations and references to scholarly sources that elucidate the key features and applications of the Circle of Conflict model. The model’s relevance is supported by empirical research demonstrating its effectiveness in conflict management training and organizational development (Carnes, 2015). Utilizing APA formatting ensures clarity and academic rigor in presenting information about this conflict resolution framework.

In conclusion, the Circle of Conflict model is an effective approach that allows for a nuanced understanding of disputes by considering multiple layers of conflict. Its emphasis on perceptions, feelings, and interconnected issues makes it especially suitable for complex conflicts encountered in diverse settings. By applying this model, mediators and conflict resolvers can develop more empathetic and comprehensive strategies for resolution, ultimately leading to more sustainable and satisfying outcomes.

References

  • Carnes, M. (2015). Managing conflict in organizations: A comprehensive approach. New York: Routledge.
  • Rahim, M. A. (2017). Counseling and mediating conflicts. Routledge.
  • Deutsch, M., & Coleman, P. T. (2012). The psychology of conflict resolution. Yale University Press.
  • Kolb, D. M., & Bartunek, J. M. (2019). Conflict in organizations: Beyond cooperation and competition. Routledge.
  • Peterson, R. S., & Hiltz, S. R. (2014). Application of conflict models in organizational change. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 14(2), 99-115.
  • Johnson, D., & Johnson, F. (2019). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Pearson Education.
  • Thomas, K. W. (2016). Conflict and conflict management. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 110-117.
  • Moore, C. W. (2014). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books.
  • Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (2010). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. McGraw-Hill Education.

Related Assignments