Week 2 Assignment: Supply Chain Management Discussion

Week 2assignment Details Supply Chain Management Discussion 300 Or

This DB has 3 Parts: You own a small manufacturing company that produces gaskets for the automotive industry. You have traditionally purchased large rolls of rubber (about 40 inches wide) and slit them into 2-inch strips for use in your die cutting process. You have been approached by a company offering to slit the material for you. Given this information, discuss the following: 1. Discuss why you would or why you would not want to have this company perform this task for you. Discuss the benefits and drawbacks from each course of action. 2. Would the fact that the other company is from a foreign country affect your decision? 3. What are the potential ethical issues related to transferring domestic labor to a foreign workforce (Offshoring)

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of supply chain management, decisions regarding outsourcing or contracting specific tasks are critical and multifaceted. When considering engaging a foreign company to slit rubber rolls for a small automobile gasket manufacturing business, several factors must be weighed carefully. On one hand, outsourcing the slit job could offer significant cost savings and operational efficiencies. On the other hand, it may introduce risks such as quality control issues, logistical complexities, and ethical considerations.

Opting to have the foreign company perform the slitting can lead to substantial financial benefits. Many foreign manufacturers operate in regions with lower labor and operational costs, which can translate into reduced expenses for the gasket company. This cost reduction can improve profit margins or allow for more competitive pricing in the automotive market. Additionally, outsourcing this process can free up internal resources and manufacturing capacity, allowing the company to focus on core competencies such as product design and marketing.

However, there are drawbacks to consider. The quality control of the slitted rubber may become less predictable when the task is outsourced abroad, especially if communication channels are limited or language barriers exist. Shipping delays and potential increases in transportation costs are logistical concerns that could impact production schedules. Moreover, reliance on a foreign supplier introduces supply chain vulnerabilities, such as political instability, tariffs, or changes in trade policies, which could disrupt operations.

When evaluating whether the foreign origin of the slitting company affects the decision, ethical and strategic dimensions emerge. Offshoring labor raises questions about fair wages, working conditions, and the broader societal impact of transferring jobs from domestic to foreign markets. Ethically, a company must consider whether it is contributing to economic displacement domestically or supporting exploitative labor practices in the foreign country. Some organizations implement strict supplier audits and ethical sourcing policies to mitigate such concerns. Strategically, offshoring may be justified if the foreign supplier adheres to recognized labor standards and the decision aligns with the company’s corporate social responsibility goals.

From an ethical standpoint, offshoring involves balancing economic advantages with social responsibility. Transferring jobs abroad can lead to unemployment and economic decline in the company's home country, prompting ethical debates about corporate responsibility toward local communities. Conversely, offshoring can enable businesses to remain competitive globally, preserve jobs in the long term, and support economic development in developing countries, provided the labor practices are fair and ethical.

In conclusion, the decision to outsource the slitting process to a foreign company involves evaluating cost advantages, quality assurance, logistical risks, and ethical considerations. Companies must weigh the benefits of lower costs and operational efficiencies against potential drawbacks related to quality, supply chain stability, and social responsibility. Transparency in supplier relationships and adherence to ethical standards are vital to managing the complex implications of offshoring, ensuring that strategic choices align with both business objectives and societal values.

References

• Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management (5th ed.). Pearson.
• Jain, R. (2018). Supply Chain Management and International Trade. Journal of International Business and Economics, 6(2), 45-58.
• Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2001). A Handbook for Value Chain Research. International Development Research Centre.
• Matthews, L. (2020). Ethical considerations in global supply chains. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(4), 563-582.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Free Press.
• Van der Vaart, T., van Donk, D. P., & van Goor, B. (2011). Ethical sourcing and supply chain responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 531–540.
• Yip, G. S. (1989). Global strategy: In a world of nations? Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 29-41.
• Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9-24.
• Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970.
• Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management: a Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(8), 455-466.