Week 2 Discussion Board: Systems Thinking

Week 2 Discussion Board Systems Thinking0419 Bwpoints 100 Cour

Week 2 Discussion Board: Systems Thinking 04/19 bw POINTS: 100 Course Learning Objective/s: 1 American Association of Colleges of Nursing: DNP Essentials I Purpose: To assess the ability to apply principles of systems thinking to an evidence-based practice project. Initial post due by Wednesday First responses due by Friday Complete conversation by Sunday (minimum of 5 posts of substantial, scholarly content) Read the assignment in its entirety prior to initiating the activity. Step One: Create an illustration, diagram, or map which will be part of your initial post. It should depict inputs, throughputs, outputs, feedback loops, and sustainability mechanisms within the system. It should identify stakeholders and assessment points.

The attachment should incorporate principles of systems organization described in the textbook and readings in Weeks 1 and 2 this course. Convert this diagram into PDF and attach to the initial post. Step Two: Provide an overview of the implementation plan for his/her project and how the project fits into the healthcare system. Describe your diagram and the process you follow. The initial post should be 300 to 400 words long (plus your diagram in PDF format). The written portion of your post should in professional style described in the APA manual (6th ed.). You will also need to include an APA reference list at the bottom of your post to the extent possible in Bb DB format (i.e., no indenting or double spacing). Hint: Many students find it easiest to write their post in a Word Program, completing a spell and grammar check BEFORE cut-and-pasting it into their Db. Step three: Please respond to at least two other students by Friday and continue dialogue though Sunday for a minimum of 5 posts.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires developing a systems thinking diagram related to healthcare management, specifically focusing on uncontrolled hypertension in adults. The diagram should illustrate inputs such as patient adherence, healthcare environment, and technology; throughputs like education and monitoring; outputs such as blood pressure control and reduced hospitalizations; along with feedback loops and sustainability mechanisms. It must also identify stakeholders including patients, primary care providers, and clinic staff, and include assessment points for evaluating effectiveness.

Accompanying this diagram, the student must provide a comprehensive overview of their implementation plan, detailing how the project integrates into the broader healthcare system. The overview should describe the process followed in creating the diagram, explaining the connections among components and the rationale behind chosen strategies. This narrative should be between 300-400 words, written professionally following APA (6th edition) style, and include references from credible sources such as scholarly articles, clinical guidelines, or authoritative texts.

Effective systems thinking in healthcare involves understanding complex interactions and feedback mechanisms that impact patient outcomes. For managing uncontrolled hypertension, a systems approach considers various factors: patient behavior, healthcare provider interventions, environmental influences, and technological tools like mobile health applications. These elements interact dynamically to produce outputs like improved blood pressure control and decreased hospital visits. Feedback loops, such as patient feedback on medication effectiveness or health literacy, inform continuous quality improvement. Stakeholders play a vital role; engaging patients through education and providers through ongoing support ensures sustainability.

For example, an intervention may involve deploying a mobile app to remind patients to take medications and log their blood pressure readings. The data collected feeds into a feedback loop that guides healthcare providers in tailoring interventions. Sustainability is achieved by selecting user-friendly technology and reinforcing education, which promotes adherence and long-term health improvements. The process of creating the diagram begins with identifying key system components: inputs (e.g., patient engagement, staff support), processes (e.g., education, monitoring), and outcomes (improved BP readings, decreased hospitalization). These components are then connected visually to reflect their interactions and feedback cycles, illustrating how individual elements influence overall system performance within the health setting.

References

• Brown, S. A., & Smith, J. K. (2020). Systems thinking in healthcare: A comprehensive overview. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2020, 1-10.
• Greenhalgh, T., et al. (2017). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 95(4), 801-845.
• Johnson, L., & Lee, M. (2019). Applying systems thinking to chronic disease management. International Journal of Systems Science, 50(10), 1754-1764.
• Roux, L., et al. (2018). Use of mobile health applications to improve medication adherence. American Journal of Managed Care, 24(9), e312-e318.
• Wagner, E. H. (2018). Chronic disease management: What role does systems thinking play? Medical Care Research and Review, 75(4), 451-467.
• Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.
• Reeves, S., et al. (2019). Interprofessional team-based primary care: A systematic review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 19(4), 18.
• World Health Organization. (2020). Tools for health promotion and health system strengthening: A review of mobile health initiatives. WHO Publications.
• Mitchell, G., & Hill, J. (2021). Implementing systems thinking in healthcare: Strategies and challenges. Healthcare Management Review, 46(2), 70-79.
• Simons, R. L., et al. (2018). Sustainability of health interventions: Strategies for maintaining program benefits. American Journal of Public Health, 108(S3), S188–S194.