Week 2 Ethics Awareness Inventory Analysis Rubric

Week 2 Ethics Awareness Inventory Analysis Rubriccontent And Organiza

All key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way. Key Elements: · 300 word analysis of completed Ethics Awareness Inventory. · Interpret your results, and apply them to your personal and professional development. The content is comprehensive. Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically. · Include a statement explaining how your educational experience has impacted your ethical thinking. · This analysis should address your use of ethics in thinking and decision-making and your potential for conflict in situations with people who have different interpretations of ethical behavior.

Readability and Style 
15 Percent Percent Earned: Comments: Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow throughout the paper. The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Sentences are well-constructed, with consistently strong, varied sentences. Sentence transitions are present and maintain the flow of thought.

Mechanics 
15 Percent Percent Earned: Comments: The paper, including the title page, reference page, tables, and appendices, follow APA guidelines for format. Citations of original works within the body of the paper follow APA guidelines. The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and white space. Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. Spelling is correct.

Total 100 
Percent Points Earned: /10 pts. Comments: Saturday, August 16, :26 PM New Section 1 Page 1 New Section 1 Page 2 Saturday, August 16, :29 PM New Section 1 Page 1 New Section 1 Page 2 New Section 1 Page 3

Paper For Above instruction

The Ethics Awareness Inventory (EAI) serves as a pivotal tool for individuals seeking to understand their ethical perspectives and improve their personal and professional decision-making. My completed EAI revealed insightful facets of my moral compass, highlighting areas of strength and opportunities for development. This analysis will interpret my results, discuss how my educational experiences have influenced my ethical views, and explore potential conflicts arising from differing ethical interpretations in various contexts.

My EAI results indicated a strong tendency toward utilitarian ethics—prioritizing outcomes that maximize overall good. I observed that I typically focus on tangible results and collective benefits when making decisions, aligning with my background in project management, where efficiency and stakeholder satisfaction are paramount. However, the inventory also revealed a conscious effort to incorporate Deontological principles—adherence to rules and moral duties—indicating an internal struggle between consequences and moral obligations. This duality reflects my attempt to balance pragmatic considerations with ethical integrity, which is essential in my personal and professional life.

Applying these insights to my development, I recognize that fostering greater awareness of my ethical biases can improve my decision-making process. For instance, I tend to emphasize outcomes, sometimes at the expense of individual rights or moral duties. Recognizing this, I aim to integrate Kantian principles more deliberately, ensuring that my decisions respect the dignity and rights of others. This is particularly relevant in leadership roles where moral commitments should guide complex choices that impact diverse stakeholders.

My educational journey has significantly shaped my ethical thinking by exposing me to diverse perspectives and moral frameworks. Courses in ethics, philosophy, and leadership have challenged me to consider alternative viewpoints, such as virtue ethics and social justice, broadening my understanding beyond utilitarian and deontological models. Engaging in case studies and discussions fostered critical reflection, allowing me to see the importance of context and cultural differences in ethical judgments. This exposure has cultivated a more nuanced appreciation of morality, emphasizing empathy and cultural competence, which are vital in today's interconnected world.

Ethical thinking influences how I approach professional dilemmas, from confidentiality breaches to conflict resolution. I recognize that situations often involve competing values, requiring careful analysis and ethical sensitivity. For example, when faced with a team member acting dishonestly, I must weigh loyalty, fairness, and honesty, acknowledging potential conflicts between these principles. Developing ethical awareness helps me navigate these conflicts more thoughtfully, striving for balanced solutions that align with core moral values.

In conclusion, my Ethics Awareness Inventory has been instrumental in identifying my ethical strengths and areas for growth. By integrating educational insights and reflecting on personal experiences, I aim to cultivate a balanced ethical approach that respects human dignity, promotes fairness, and considers the broader social impact. Recognizing potential conflicts and understanding different moral frameworks equips me to handle complex dilemmas more ethically and effectively in my ongoing professional journey.

References

• Alexander, L., & Keating, P. (2022). Ethics: A comprehensive introduction. Routledge.
• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Harper & Row.
• Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good. Oxford University Press.
• Singer, P. (2011). Practical ethics. Cambridge University Press.
• Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2021). Managing business ethics. Wiley.
• Velasquez, M., Andre, T., Shanks, S., & Meyer, M. J. (2015). Thinking critically about ethical issues. Pearson.
• Windish, J. (2018). Ethical decision-making in leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 15-28.
• Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge University Press.
• Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility and global justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 19(4), 410-426.