Week 2 Impact Of The DSM-5 Organization Development Strength ✓ Solved

Week 2 Impact Of The DSM 5 Organization Development Strengths And

Analyze how the DSM-5 is organized and why. Explore the strengths and limitations of the DSM-5 diagnostic system. Differentiate between normal behavior and diagnosable symptoms using the concepts of dimensionality and spectrum. Consider the following case: Ms. Evans, age 27, was awaiting discharge from her service in Iraq when her colleagues noticed increased fearfulness and hearing voices predicting the world's destruction in 2020. She reported depression, and her performance declined. Her family history includes schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. She tested positive for THC. The social worker tentatively diagnosed her with schizophrenia. Discuss how a social worker should approach this diagnosis, considering symptoms, the impact of sharing or withholding a tentative diagnosis, the use of provisional diagnoses, and diagnosing unspecified disorders.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), serves as a critical tool for mental health professionals, including social workers, aiding in the standardized diagnosis of mental disorders. The DSM-5's organization reflects efforts to incorporate dimensionality and spectrum concepts, recognizing that mental health symptoms often exist along continua rather than as strict categories. This approach aims to improve diagnostic accuracy, accommodate individual variations, and inform targeted interventions.

Organization of the DSM-5

The DSM-5 is organized into several key sections: an introduction, diagnostic criteria for mental disorders, and descriptive material. Its structure emphasizes a dimensional approach, allowing clinicians to rate symptom severity and functional impairment, rather than solely assigning categorical diagnoses. This reflects a paradigm shift from a binary classification—either present or absent—to a more nuanced understanding of mental health conditions as existing along spectrums.

Strengths of the DSM-5

One of the primary strengths of the DSM-5 lies in its capacity to facilitate communication among professionals through a shared language. Its dimensional framework enhances diagnostic precision by capturing severity levels and functional impairments, which are essential for tailoring treatment. The manual's comprehensive nature fosters a holistic view, integrating biological, psychological, and social factors—aligning with biopsychosocial models. Furthermore, its standardized criteria support research, enhance reliability, and influence mental health policy and insurance coverage.

Limitations of the DSM-5

Despite its strengths, the DSM-5 faces critiques. Overdiagnosis is a concern, potentially pathologizing normative behaviors or cultural variations. The categorical approach may oversimplify complex human experiences, neglecting nuanced spectrum presentations. Cultural biases and the influence of pharmaceutical interests can shape diagnostic criteria, leading to potential misclassification. The manual may also contribute to stigmatization and reduce individual differences to labels, risking a one-size-fits-all approach.

Normal Behavior Versus Diagnosable Symptoms

Distinguishing normal distress from mental disorder involves understanding the concepts of spectrum and dimensionality. For example, grief following a loss is a normal process, whereas persistent, intense symptoms impairing functioning may indicate a disorder. The DSM-5 cautions against overpathologizing transient emotional reactions by including criteria that assess duration, intensity, and impact. Recognizing spectrum allows clinicians to appreciate variability and avoid labeling normative reactions as pathological.

Case Analysis: Ms. Evans

In the case of Ms. Evans, symptoms such as hearing voices predicting the world's end, decreased self-care, and declining job performance are red flags signaling potential mental health issues like psychosis or schizophrenia. Her family history further supports this suspicion. However, it is imperative to approach diagnosis carefully, considering cultural, environmental, and substance-related factors like THC use. Sharing a tentative diagnosis with Ms. Evans necessitates ethical considerations, emphasizing informed consent, respect for autonomy, and the risks of misdiagnosis.

Approaching the Diagnosis

Given the limited information, the social worker should adopt a cautious, comprehensive assessment strategy before confirming a diagnosis. Using provisional diagnoses, such as "Schizophrenia—Provisional," allows gathering further data without prematurely labeling. It is crucial to communicate transparently with Ms. Evans, explaining that assessments are ongoing, and avoid definitive labels that could impact her perception and treatment adherence negatively.

Impact of Diagnosis and Ethical Considerations

Sharing a tentative diagnosis can empower clients by promoting understanding and engagement but may also cause distress or stigma if misunderstood. The social worker must weigh these factors, ensuring the client’s rights are protected and that interventions are person-centered. Ethical practice mandates informed consent and collaborative decision-making, especially when using provisional diagnoses.

Conclusion

The DSM-5's organization and dimensional approach provide valuable tools for diagnosis but require careful application. Recognizing the spectrum of human experiences and maintaining ethical standards are crucial in supporting clients like Ms. Evans effectively. A nuanced, culturally sensitive, and ethically informed approach enhances diagnostic accuracy and fosters trust and recovery.

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
• Neukrug, E. S., & Fawcett, R. C. (2015). Diagnosis in the assessment process. In Essentials of testing and assessment: A practical guide for counselors, social workers, and psychologists (3rd ed., pp. 43–58). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
• Paris, J. (2015). The intelligent clinician's guide to the DSM-5 (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Lasalvia, A. (2015). DSM-5 two years later: Facts, myths and some key open issues. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 24(3), 185–187.
• Wakefield, J. C. (2013). DSM-5: An overview of changes and controversies. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41(2), 139–154.
• Stern, R. (2016). The pros and cons of diagnostic labeling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling.
• Moreno, C., & Weitzman, A. (2014). Cultural considerations in psychiatric diagnosis. Global Mental Health.
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Preface. In DSM-5.
• Lopez, S. R., & Guarnaccia, P. J. (2017). Culture, diagnosis, and mental health services. American Journal of Psychiatry.
• American Psychological Association. (2015). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.