Week 2 Research Checkpoint: Lessons 1, 2, 3, 4, And 5

Week 2 Research Checkpointwlos 1 2 3 And 4 Clos 2 3 4 And 5

As was laid out in the Week 1 and Week 2 lessons and the Week 1 Discussion, you will be working on your final assignment throughout the course. In Weeks 2 and 4, you will keep your instructor apprised of your progress by providing an update of your headway thus far. Prior to working on this assignment, you will need to identify at least one source on your social problem from one of the two disciplines you selected last week. To do so, choose a discipline you want to explore. Access the journal links through your online course.

Once you have selected a discipline, start your research for your final by identifying one source that aligns with your final topic, read it, and reflect upon it. The blue headings below contain links to resources for specific disciplines. Select the blue headings to expand the text in each section.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of developing a comprehensive understanding of a social problem necessitates methodical research rooted in specific academic disciplines. As articulated in the Week 1 and Week 2 course lessons, students are expected to continually update their progress on the final assignment during Weeks 2 and 4. This ongoing engagement ensures that they remain aligned with their research goals and demonstrate consistent advancement.

Central to this research is the selection of pertinent sources that elucidate the social problem through a discipline-specific lens. Initially, students must identify at least one scholarly or credible source related to their social problem from one of the disciplines they chose in the previous week. Choosing a discipline—such as sociology, psychology, economics, or political science—shapes the perspective and analytical framework applied to understanding the social issue.

Accessing journal links provided via the online course platform allows students to locate discipline-specific resources. These sources may include peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, or credible reports that contribute to a nuanced understanding of the social problem. Once a suitable source has been identified, students are tasked with thoroughly reading and critically reflecting upon it to affirm its relevance and to extract valuable insights.

This process is critical because it enables students to build a foundational knowledge base for their final project. The reflections should integrate an assessment of how the source relates to the social problem, the discipline's approach to analyzing the issue, and any insights or questions that emerge from the reading. This disciplined inquiry supports the development of an integrative perspective that will underpin the final paper.

Furthermore, the instructions note that blue headings in provided resources link to targeted discipline-specific content. By selecting these links, students can expand their understanding of how different academic frameworks analyze social problems, thereby enriching their research approach and fostering interdisciplinary insights.

Overall, this research checkpoint emphasizes the importance of selecting a credible source aligned with a chosen discipline, engaging critically with this source, and documenting progress for the final assignment development. Such an approach ensures that students advance in their understanding and contribute meaningfully to scholarly discussions surrounding their social issue.

References

• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage publications.
• Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning.
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.
• Silver, C., & Woolf, N. H. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.
• Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2007). Research methods knowledge base. Atomic Dog Publishing.
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
• Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46.
• Berkowitz, L. (2012). Social motivations. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 627-647.