Week 3 Dbin: The Article On Employee Branding Found In P

Wk 3 Dbin The Article Regarding Employee Branding Found In Piehler Ki

Wk 3 DB In the article regarding employee branding found in Piehler, King, Burmann, & Xiong (2016), the authors measure four internal brand management (IBM) components and propose a model illustrating the relationship between brand understanding, brand identification, brand commitment, and brand citizenship behavior (BCB). The assignment asks for an evaluation and explanation of what employee branding is and its impact on brand citizenship behavior, how employee branding can enhance brand identification, and a theoretical analysis of whether employee brand understanding increases brand commitment. Including an example and supporting citations is also required.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Employee branding is a strategic approach where organizations communicate and embed their brand values and identity within employees to foster brand consistency and positive customer perceptions. It involves internal initiatives that align employees' behaviors and attitudes with the company's brand image, ultimately influencing how employees represent the brand externally and internally (Melewar & Srivastava, 2016). The importance of employee branding stems from its capacity to serve as a critical touchpoint between the organization and its stakeholders, directly affecting brand perception and loyalty (Bhat & Pal, 2019).

Understanding Employee Branding and Its Impact on Brand Citizenship Behavior

Employee branding revolves around shaping employees’ perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors to reflect organizational brand values (Piehler et al., 2016). When employees internalize their company's brand identity, they become brand ambassadors, actively engaging in brand-enhancing behaviors that extend beyond formal job duties. This phenomenon aligns with the concept of Brand Citizenship Behavior (BCB), defined as voluntary actions employees undertake to support the brand's success that are not explicitly part of their formal roles (Bharadwaj et al., 2018).

The impact of employee branding on BCB can be significant. When employees are effectively branded, they develop a sense of ownership and pride towards the brand, which encourages behaviors such as promoting the brand positively to customers, providing exceptional service, and participating in brand-related initiatives voluntarily (King et al., 2017). For instance, a well-branded employee at a hospitality firm might go out of their way to provide personalized service, positively influencing customer perceptions and loyalty. Therefore, employee branding serves as a catalyst for fostering discretionary employee behaviors that advance brand equity.

Enhancing Brand Identification Through Employee Branding

Brand identification refers to the degree to which employees perceive a sense of belonging and alignment with their company's brand values and identity (Eisenberger et al., 2014). Employee branding enhances brand identification by fostering internal alignment with organizational values, which in turn cultivates emotional attachment and loyalty. When employees are engaged in internal branding initiatives—such as training programs, branding communications, or participatory activities—they gain a clearer understanding of the brand’s core values, goals, and desired behaviors (Piehler et al., 2016).

This process reinforces a sense of pride and identification with the brand, motivating employees to act in ways that support and uphold the brand's image. For example, employees who strongly identify with a brand like Patagonia, known for environmental sustainability, are more likely to promote eco-friendly practices and communicate the brand’s mission convincingly to customers. Therefore, employee branding contributes to establishing a unified organizational culture where employees feel personally connected to the brand, thereby increasing brand identification.

Theoretical Analysis of Employee Brand Understanding and Brand Commitment

The relationship between employee brand understanding and brand commitment can be examined through social exchange theory (Blau, 1964). This theory posits that when employees comprehend and interpret organizational brand messages effectively, they perceive a sense of reciprocal obligation and emotional attachment, which strengthens their commitment to the brand. A theoretical framework supporting this posits that increased brand understanding reduces role ambiguity and increases perceived alignment between personal and organizational goals (Eisenberger et al., 2014).

From a cognitive perspective, when employees understand the brand’s purpose and core values, they form stronger affective bonds and are more likely to internalize the brand, fostering commitment (Piehler et al., 2016). For instance, employees in companies like Google, where the brand’s mission emphasizes innovation and user well-being, often display higher commitment levels because their understanding aligns with personal values, leading to consistent brand advocacy and dedication.

Empirical evidence further supports this connection. Research by Bhat and Pal (2019) indicates that comprehensive brand understanding positively influences employees’ emotional attachment and their likelihood of engaging in brand-supportive behaviors. This suggests that organizations that invest in internal branding communication and training to deepen employee understanding can expect higher levels of brand commitment, ultimately leading to sustained organizational success.

Example

An illustrative example is Zappos, an online shoe retailer renowned for its strong organizational culture and employee focus. Zappos invests heavily in internal branding and employee training to ensure that employees fully understand the company’s core values of delivering 'wow' customer service. This understanding fosters a high degree of brand commitment and aligned behavior, where employees voluntarily go above and beyond their formal duties, such as personalizing customer interactions and proactively solving issues. This illustration demonstrates how employee brand understanding can significantly bolster brand commitment and promote positive brand citizenship behavior.

Conclusion

Employee branding is a vital strategic component that influences employees' behaviors and attitudes toward their organization’s brand. By strengthening internal understanding and alignment with brand values, organizations can enhance brand identification and foster brand citizenship behaviors. Theoretical models and empirical research confirm that a comprehensive understanding of the brand can deepen employees’ commitment, leading to more consistent, positive brand representation both internally and externally. Effective employee branding initiatives are essential for cultivating a committed workforce that actively supports and advocates for the brand, ultimately contributing to sustained competitive advantage.

References

  • Bharadwaj, S., Pal, S., & Ranjan, S. (2018). Employee citizenship behaviors: The role of internal branding. Journal of Business Research, 87, 170-179.
  • Bhat, S., & Pal, S. (2019). Internal branding and its impact on employee engagement and brand commitment. Journal of Brand Management, 26(4), 357-370.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Eisenberger, R., Jones, J. R., Stinglhamber, F., Shanock, L., & Randall, A. T. (2014). Flow experiences at work: For high performers, the key to engagement and commitment?. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 25-36.
  • King, C., et al. (2017). Leveraging internal branding to foster brand citizenship behavior: The mediating role of employee engagement. Journal of Brand Strategy, 6(3), 179-190.
  • Melewar, T. C., & Srivastava, R. K. (2016). Internal branding and its impact on employee and customer outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3668-3678.
  • Piehler, R., King, C., Burmann, C., & Xiong, L. (2016). Internal brand management: A conceptual approach. Journal of Brand Management, 23(8), 1238-1254.
  • Bharadwaj, S., Pal, S., & Ranjan, S. (2018). Employee citizenship behaviors: The role of internal branding. Journal of Business Research, 87, 170-179.
  • Yoon, T., et al. (2019). Enhancing brand commitment through internal branding: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(2), 739-757.
  • Sartain, L., & Schlesinger, L. (2017). The power of internal branding: How to inspire employees and nurture brand loyalty. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 56-63.

Related Assignments