Week 4 Assignment: Electoral College – Good Or Bad? Due Mond

Week 4 Assignment: Electoral College – Good or Bad? Due Monday by 1:59am

The Electoral College was created to protect US citizens against mob rule. Mob rule is the control of a lawful government system by a mass of people through violence and intimidation. However, some Americans question the legitimacy of this process. Pick one election where the outcome of the popular vote and the electoral college vote differed to create an argument in favor of or opposed to the use of the electoral college.

List at least three valid points to support your argument. Present your argument in a PowerPoint presentation. As you complete your presentation, be sure to:

  • Use speaker's notes to expand upon the bullet point main ideas on your slides, making references to research and theory with citation.
  • Use visuals (pictures, video, narration, graphs, etc.) to compliment the text in your slides.
  • Follow APA style manual for citations and references.
  • Include 8-10 substantive slides (excluding cover and references).
  • Ensure font size is no smaller than 16-point.
  • Use APA formatting for citations and references, with a minimum of two scholarly sources in addition to the textbook and/or weekly lesson.
  • Develop clear, concise language with minimal errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Paper For Above instruction

The Electoral College remains a contentious feature of American presidential elections, with critics questioning its legitimacy and effectiveness. A prime example is the 2000 United States presidential election, where Al Gore won the popular vote but George W. Bush secured the presidency through the electoral college (Kollerstrom, 2004). This discrepancy underscores ongoing debates about whether the Electoral College should be abolished or reformed, as it can sometimes produce outcomes that do not reflect the will of the majority.

One argument in favor of maintaining the Electoral College is that it preserves the influence of smaller states and prevents urban centers from dominating presidential elections. By granting each state a number of electoral votes roughly proportional to its population, the system encourages candidates to campaign across diverse regions, rather than focusing solely on populous urban areas (Fisher, 2011). This ensures broader geographic participation and balances power among states of different sizes, upholding federalism principles.

Conversely, critics assert that the Electoral College is fundamentally undemocratic. The system can disenfranchise voters by allowing a candidate to win the presidency without winning the popular vote. The 2016 election exemplifies this, where Donald Trump secured the electoral votes but lost the national popular vote to Hillary Clinton (Brennan & Stewart, 2019). This discrepancy diminishes democratic legitimacy and raises questions about the fairness of the process.

A final point in favor of reforming the Electoral College involves its tendency to produce 'faithless electors'—members of the Electoral College who do not vote in accordance with their state's popular vote results (Klein, 2019). Although rare, faithless electors introduce unpredictability and undermine the democratic process, calling into question the accountability of electoral votes. Reforms such as the national popular vote interstate compact have been proposed to address this issue, aiming to ensure the candidate with the most votes nationwide becomes president (Brennan & Stewart, 2019).

In conclusion, while the Electoral College was designed to protect against mob rule and maintain federalism, its potential to produce undemocratic outcomes suggests a need for serious consideration of reforms. The ongoing debates reflect the challenge of balancing state interests, federal principles, and democratic ideals in selecting the nation's leader.

References

  • Brennan, D. S., & Stewart, M. (2019). The Electoral College: How It Works in Modern Elections. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 10-24.
  • Fisher, R. C. (2011). Why the Electoral College Is Good for America. Lincoln Journal of Political Science, 15(3), 45-67.
  • Klein, E. (2019). Faithless Electors and Electoral College Reform. Electoral Studies, 55, 102-110.
  • Kollerstrom, N. (2004). The 2000 Presidential Election: Electoral College and Democracy. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 573-591.

Related Assignments