Week 4 Discussion 2 Eng 122 Help Now Please View The Video
Week 4 Discussion 2 Eng 122helpnow Please View The Videoattaching Do
Please review the following instructions for your Week 4 discussion post: first, watch the video “Attaching Documents to Discussions” for guidance on attaching your draft to your discussion post. Next, complete the preparation steps by reading Chapter 8 in the textbook, reviewing the supplemental “ENG122 Peer Review and Revision Guidelines,” and the Ashford Writing Center articles on “Avoiding Plagiarism,” “Essay Structure,” “Writing Reviser Tool,” and “APA References List.” Also, review the grading rubric for this discussion.
Before drafting your initial post, reflect on your rough draft by asking yourself whether your thesis claim is fully developed and supported throughout your essay, whether your topic sentences support your thesis, and whether you've provided evidence for your claims. Decide if you plan to submit your draft to the Ashford Writing Center for review.
Then, write and share your draft as a Microsoft Word document attachment, including an APA-formatted references list for sources used. In 200 to 300 words, explain your review process—specifically how you checked your draft for logical fallacies, citation errors, and potential plagiarism (e.g., Turnitin). Also, discuss any specific questions you have about your essay's structure.
Paper For Above instruction
In my review process, I began by carefully proofreading my draft for logical fallacies and coherence, ensuring that each paragraph supported my thesis statement clearly. To identify citation errors, I cross-checked all in-text citations with my references list, adhering to APA formatting guidelines. Additionally, I submitted my draft to Turnitin to check for potential plagiarism, reviewing the similarity report to confirm that all sources were properly cited and paraphrased where necessary. I made revisions to address any highlighted issues, ensuring the integrity of my work and proper attribution of sources. My primary concern was maintaining logical flow and avoiding unintentional plagiarism, so I focused on clarity and correct citation practice during my review. I plan to seek feedback from the Ashford Writing Center to further polish my draft before submitting it.
Regarding my essay structure, I am confident that my introduction effectively introduces my thesis, and my topic sentences support the main argument. However, I have questions about balancing evidence across paragraphs to ensure consistent support throughout the essay. Specifically, I want to ensure that each topic sentence and paragraph adequately supports my thesis without redundancy or gaps. I am considering adding more transitional phrases to improve overall coherence between ideas and sections.
In future writing activities, I will apply my review process consistently by setting aside time to carefully proofread and check citations with available tools such as APA guidelines and Turnitin. To address areas of weakness, like enhancing the logical flow, I plan to utilize peer reviews and consult the Ashford Writing Center for guidance. This approach will help strengthen my critical thinking and organizational skills, ultimately improving the quality of my writing and research practices.
Paper For Above instruction
In preparing my draft for review, I employed a systematic approach to ensure its quality and adherence to academic standards. First, I read through the entire draft multiple times, evaluating the clarity of my arguments, coherence of ideas, and alignment of each paragraph with my thesis statement. I meticulously checked each citation to verify correctness and consistency with APA format, ensuring proper attribution of all sources. To prevent plagiarism, I utilized Turnitin, which provided a similarity report; I carefully examined the highlighted sections and rephrased any unoriginal text to improve originality and accuracy in citations. This process helped me detect unintentional paraphrasing issues or missing citations and allowed me to revise accordingly.
Furthermore, I scrutinized my draft for logical fallacies—such as overgeneralizations or unsupported claims—by asking myself if each claim was substantiated with credible evidence. I also questioned whether the overall structure supported a logical progression of ideas, from introduction through body paragraphs to conclusion. This reflection revealed that while my introduction clearly stated my thesis, some body paragraphs needed smoother transitions and more balanced evidence. I plan to refine these areas by adding linking sentences and verifying that each paragraph's main point directly supports my central argument.
My questions primarily concern essay structure. I am uncertain if my paragraph organization effectively guides the reader through my argument and whether I should incorporate more transitional phrases for clarity. I intend to seek feedback from peers and the Ashford Writing Center to address these concerns. Moving forward, I will incorporate this review methodology into all academic writing tasks to improve my critical evaluation skills, strengthen my evidence support, and enhance the overall quality of my essays.
References
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
- Ashford Writing Center. (n.d.). Avoiding plagiarism. https://writingcenter ashford.edu
- Ashford Writing Center. (n.d.). Essay structure. https://writingcenter ashford.edu
- Ashford Writing Center. (n.d.). Writing reviser tool. https://writingcenter ashford.edu
- Ashford Writing Center. (n.d.). APA references list. https://writingcenter ashford.edu
- Borchers, T. (2015). What goes into an argument? Bedford/St. Martin's.
- Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They say / I say: The moves that matter in academic writing (4th ed.). W.W. Norton & Company.
- Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2016). A writer's reference (7th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
- Johnson, H. M. (2021). Developing critical thinking skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 263-274.
- Shields, W. (2019). Research methods in education. SAGE Publications.