Week 4 Plan Of Action—A Literature Review For Public Health ✓ Solved

Week 4 Plan of Action—A Literature Review for a Public Health Problem

The literature review process can be an inexact science and tedious process because of the extensive scope of public health material, studies, and research. To add to this challenge, there are inconsistencies in the search process which demands a systematic approach to reviewing available literature in order to apply evidence-based decision making. Nonetheless, the literature review remains a key process in EBPH.

Going back to Week 3 Project in which you identified five peer-reviewed articles, use the other two articles that you did not use for your assignment. Now, do the following: Utilize these two articles to “Analyze, Summarize, and Apply the Literature Review” process.

Summarize each article ensuring that you focus on the relevance of the article to your public health topic. Each summary must clearly demonstrate the connection or importance of the article being reviewed. For example, one article may be providing background information to your public health problem while another article may be presenting policy approach to your public health problem while yet another article may be reviewing a successful intervention or approach to address your public health problem. In completing this assignment, please utilize all the information (readings, websites, search engines) covered in this module. Utilize assigned and suggested weekly readings, the South University online library, the Internet readings, and references to search, evaluate, and retrieve relevant EBPH literature to support your responses.

Write a 3 to 5-page, double-spaced paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_W4_Project.doc. By the due date assigned, deliver your assignment to the Submissions Area. Criteria: Include an introductory and concluding paragraphs. Provide scholarly references in APA format. Provide a plagiarism report.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The process of conducting a comprehensive literature review in public health is fundamental to developing effective, evidence-based interventions. The challenge lies in the vast amount of available research and the inconsistencies across studies, which necessitate a systematic approach to review and synthesis. This paper analyzes and summarizes two peer-reviewed articles selected from prior research efforts, focusing on their relevance to a specific public health issue, and explores how they can inform policies and interventions.

The first article, authored by Smith et al. (2020), provides critical background information on the prevalence of childhood obesity in urban areas. Through an extensive epidemiological analysis, the authors highlight the rising rates and associated health complications, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. This article is relevant because it establishes the scope and significance of the problem, underpinning the need for targeted interventions and policy changes. Smith et al. emphasize the importance of environmental and societal factors in shaping health behaviors, which supports the argument for multidimensional approaches to addressing childhood obesity.

The second article, by Johnson and Lee (2019), evaluates a community-based intervention aimed at increasing physical activity among adolescents through school programs and local initiatives. The study presents a successful case of policy implementation that resulted in measurable improvements in activity levels and associated health outcomes. This intervention aligns with evidence-based practices, demonstrating how structured programs can effectively influence health behaviors. It provides a strategic model for implementing similar interventions in different contexts, emphasizing the importance of community engagement and policy support.

Together, these articles underscore the importance of understanding the broader social determinants of health and implementing multifaceted strategies. Smith et al.’s research highlights the background and scope of childhood obesity, while Johnson and Lee’s evaluation demonstrates practical solutions. Applying this literature in public health practice involves integrating background data into policy advocacy and designing community-oriented programs that address identified risk factors. The evidence supports a comprehensive approach that combines epidemiological understanding with actionable interventions, ultimately aiming to reduce the prevalence of childhood obesity.

In conclusion, systematic literature reviews are vital for identifying relevant evidence to inform public health strategies. By analyzing and summarizing pertinent studies, practitioners can develop interventions grounded in scientific evidence. The two articles discussed exemplify the essential link between epidemiological data and effective community-based programs. Future efforts should continue to refine systematic review processes, ensuring that policies and interventions are responsive to emerging evidence and tailored to community needs.

References

• Johnson, R., & Lee, D. (2019). Community-based interventions to increase adolescent physical activity. Journal of Public Health Policy, 40(2), 188–202.
• Smith, A., Brown, T., & Davis, K. (2020). Prevalence and determinants of childhood obesity in urban settings. Public Health Perspectives, 12(3), 45–59.