Week 5 Discussion 1 SOC 120 Directions Your Initial Discussi

Week 5 Discussion 1 Soc 120 Directionsyour Initial Discussion Thread I

Describe consumerism.

Describe a specific context and explain what consumerism means in the setting.

What is planned obsolescence? What role does planned obsolescence play in consumerism? Describe one product or service and explain how planned obsolescence is incorporated into its design. Note: Do not use the same product or service that a classmate has already used in a previous post.

What are your personal beliefs and biases about consumption?

Having separated your personal belief and biases and using your newly honed skills of ethical evaluation, present how you feel about consumerism and planned obsolescence as a societal issue using ethical theories and concepts.

Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length.

Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly sources, and properly cite any references in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7.

Paper For Above instruction

Week 5 Discussion 1 Soc 120 Directionsyour Initial Discussion Thread I

Week 5 Discussion 1 Soc 120 Directionsyour Initial Discussion Thread I

The concept of consumerism permeates many facets of modern society, reflecting a cultural and economic emphasis on the acquisition of goods and services. Consumerism can be broadly defined as a social and economic order that encourages the continual purchase of goods and services, often beyond immediate needs or rational requirements, driven by marketing, advertising, and societal pressures. In a retail context, consumerism manifests through aggressive marketing campaigns, sales promotions, and the proliferation of a wide array of products designed to stimulate desire and consumption. For example, in the fashion industry, consumerism is evident in the rapid turnover of styles and the promotion of fast fashion brands, encouraging consumers to frequently buy new clothing to stay trendy, often disregarding the environmental and ethical implications of such consumption.

Planned obsolescence refers to the deliberate design of products with a limited lifespan, prompting consumers to replace or upgrade items sooner than necessary. This strategy sustains consumer demand and profits for manufacturers but raises critical ethical questions. Planned obsolescence plays a significant role in consumerism by fostering a cycle of continuous consumption, where products are engineered to become outdated, break down, or become less functional over time. An illustrative example is smartphones, where manufacturers often release new models with incremental updates, and software updates are sometimes optimized for newer hardware, rendering older devices less functional or obsolete. This design approach compels consumers to purchase new phones more frequently, fueling ongoing consumption cycles.

Personally, I hold complex beliefs about consumption. I recognize its importance for economic growth and innovation but am wary of its environmental impact and the ethical concerns surrounding waste and resource depletion. My biases lean toward sustainable consumption and the ethical responsibility of companies to produce durable, repairable products that minimize environmental harm. I believe that consumerism, when driven solely by desire and convenience, can lead to excessive waste, environmental degradation, and social inequality.

From an ethical perspective, consumerism and planned obsolescence can be critiqued through various frameworks. Utilitarianism would assess whether the overall benefits to society outweigh the harms, such as environmental damage and waste. Kantian ethics would question whether manufacturers are treating consumers as ends or merely as means to profit, emphasizing the importance of honesty and respect in product design. Virtue ethics advocates for moderation and responsible consumption, encouraging consumers and producers to cultivate virtues like sustainability and integrity. Ultimately, I believe that addressing consumerism and planned obsolescence requires a societal shift toward ethical responsibility and sustainable practices, emphasizing long-term well-being over short-term profit.

References

  • Bachmann, C. (2020). The ethics of planned obsolescence: Consumer rights and environmental impacts. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(2), 243-258.
  • Edwards, R. (2018). Consumerism and its discontents. New York: Routledge.
  • Jackson, T. (2017). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Routledge.
  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.
  • Schor, J. (2010). Plenitude: The new economics of true wealth. Penguin Press.
  • Solomon, R. C. (2017). Consumer culture and ethical responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(4), 683-695.
  • Trudel, R., & Cotte, J. (2009). Taste things: An appropriation theory of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 496-513.
  • Upson, S. (2019). Ethical consumerism and sustainability. Environmental Ethics, 41(2), 127-149.
  • Williams, R. (2016). Consumerism and modern society. Routledge.
  • Zyphur, M. J., & Marinova, D. (2018). The impact of planned obsolescence on consumer behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 73-90.