Week 6 Article Critique Cristal Vázquez Dávila Universidad ✓ Solved

Week 6 Article Critiquecristal Vázquez Dávilawalden Universityweek

Critique the article by Canbeldek and Isikoglu Erdogan (2017) titled "The Effects of early childhood classroom size and duration on development of children." Summarize the study’s objectives, the types of data collected, the statistical methods used, and the main findings. Evaluate the appropriateness of the statistical tests, such as factorial ANOVA, used to analyze the data, and discuss whether the results support the conclusions. Identify any limitations or areas where the analysis could be improved and suggest further research considerations based on the findings.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Child development research plays a vital role in shaping educational strategies and policies. Understanding factors that influence developmental levels among children in early childhood classrooms is essential for optimizing educational outcomes. The study conducted by Canbeldek and Isikoglu Erdogan (2017) investigates how classroom size and program duration impact children’s developmental progress, utilizing statistical techniques such as factorial ANOVA to analyze their data.

Summary of the Study

Canbeldek and Isikoglu Erdogan (2017) aimed to explore whether classroom size and the duration of educational programs significantly affect children’s developmental levels. To gather data, they employed two main tools: the Informational Questionnaire and the Ankara Developmental Screening Inventory. The Inf ormational Questionnaire likely provided demographic and contextual information, whereas the Developmental Screening Inventory assessed the children’s developmental status across various domains.

The researchers analyzed their data using several statistical methods, primarily factorial ANOVA, independent t-tests, and repeated measures ANOVA. The factorial ANOVA was critical for evaluating the interaction effects between classroom size and program duration on developmental outcomes, given they were categorical variables. The two-way ANOVA is appropriate here because it can simultaneously examine how two independent categorical variables influence a dependent variable—in this case, developmental levels.

Statistical Methods and Their Appropriateness

The choice of factorial ANOVA was appropriate because the study aimed to investigate the interaction between two categorical variables (classroom size and program duration) and their effect on a continuous dependent variable (developmental level). Conducting multiple tables—such as univariate ANOVA tables, descriptive statistics, and post hoc comparisons using the Tukey test—allowed for a comprehensive understanding of the data. The use of graphical plots further added interpretability by visually demonstrating the relationships between variables.

Nonetheless, the authors could have strengthened their analysis by incorporating cross-tabulation or contingency tables to better explore relationships between independent variables and other demographic factors, such as cultural background or socioeconomic status, which could influence developmental outcomes.

Main Findings and Interpretation

The results indicated a statistically significant relationship between classroom size and children’s developmental levels. Larger classrooms appeared to negatively impact development, aligning with existing research that suggests crowded environments hinder individual attention and learning opportunities. However, the results regarding program duration were less clear, with some indications of significance but not consistently across all measures.

Graphical plots demonstrated no intersections at any points, strengthening the conclusion that the factors under study had genuine effects. However, the absence of detailed factors such as cultural influences and environmental variables limits the conclusiveness of these findings. The authors acknowledged this limitation and recommended additional research to account for variables like cultural factors.

Limitations & Recommendations for Future Research

Despite the robust statistical analyses, some limitations reduce the generalizability of these findings. First, the study did not thoroughly explore potential confounders related to cultural, socioeconomic, or environmental influences on child development. Second, the study design appears cross-sectional, limiting conclusions about causality. Lastly, the sample size and demographic diversity are not detailed, which could affect the results’ applicability across different populations.

Future research should incorporate longitudinal designs to better assess causal relationships over time and include broader demographic variables. Employing multivariate analyses could help in controlling for potential confounders, providing a more nuanced understanding of how classroom environment and program duration impact child development.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study by Canbeldek and Isikoglu Erdogan (2017) effectively uses factorial ANOVA to examine how classroom size and program duration influence developmental levels in children. The statistical methods were appropriate, and the findings suggest that smaller classrooms may promote better developmental outcomes. However, further research that considers additional factors and employs more comprehensive statistical models is necessary to deepen our understanding. Such insights can guide educators and policymakers in creating optimal early childhood learning environments.

References

• Canbeldek, M. M., & Isikoglu Erdogan, N. N. (2017). The Effects of early childhood classroom size and duration on development of children. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (68). https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.68.14
• Adedoyin, O. A., & Opeoluwa, O. (2019). Child development and early childhood education: Impacts on educational outcomes. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 17(2), 127–137.
• Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.
• Garson, G. D. (2016). Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Statistical Associates Publishing.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications.
• Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Houghton Mifflin.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education.
• Robson, C. (2011). Real World Research. Wiley.
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson.
• Vogt, W. P. (2011). Science, the false idol. Teachers College Record, 113(9), 1894–1914.