Week Five Lecture: Evaluating The Quality Of Financial Repor

Weekfive Lectureevaluating The Quality Of Financial Reportsthe Collap

Week Five Lecture Evaluating The Quality of Financial Reports The collapse of Enron in the early 2000s, which was a result of massive financial manipulation, gave rise to a new era of financial reporting supervision with the establishment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002. The Act required all executives to give certified and accurate financial information. Various mechanisms were put in place to reduce financial accounting irregularities (Cunningham, 2005). Managers are therefore required to have a clear understanding of the regulations put in place and the bodies which enforce them in order to conform with them accordingly. Issuance of financial reports and sale of securities to the public is monitored by such organizations as: 1. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) 2. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and 3. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FIRA)

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has developed the financial accounting standards to be used in the U.S. since 1973. Its function is to oversee the preparation of financial reports by non-governmental entities. FASB ensures that financial statements contain information relevant for sound decision making. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been charged with the statutory authority of establishing reporting standards for U.S. public companies. Although it does not develop the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), it has power to monitor financial reporting. The SEC seeks its authority from three security laws: The Securities Act of 1933 (SEC, 2012b), The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC, 2012c), The Investment Company Act of 1940 (SEC, 2012a), The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SEC, 2005), and The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (SEC, 2014). The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FIRA) regulates securities firms conducting business with the public in the U.S.

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) develops and publishes International Financial Reporting Standards through the help of its 15 full-time members from different countries working with stakeholders all over the world. The usefulness of financial reports to readers depends on report quality. The conceptual framework for financial reporting categorizes qualitative characteristics of financial reports into two broad categories: fundamental qualitative characteristics, which include relevance and faithful representation, and enhancing qualitative characteristics, which make financial reports more useful and include comparability, timeliness, verifiability, and understandability. Presentation of financial reporting is limited by materiality and cost constraints.

There exist differences in U.S. reporting requirements and the international requirements, although efforts have been undertaken to congregate the U.S. GAAP rules with the international financial reporting rules (Oxford Analytica, 2009). Differences in U.S. reporting requirements and international financial reporting are evident in terms of asset value, revenue recognition, research and development, inventory and discontinued operations. It is a requirement by law that financial statements of a public company be audited by an external auditing body that reviews the company’s operations and the financial statements to ensure that they are accurate and are in conformity with proper internal controls. They also help cross-check financial statements for creative accounting tricks that companies can use to mislead the public. These include false reporting of revenue, assets, expenses, and liabilities.

Paper For Above instruction

The collapse of Enron in the early 2000s serves as a pivotal moment in the history of financial reporting, highlighting the importance of transparency, accuracy, and regulatory oversight in corporate financial disclosures. Enron's scandal, marked by widespread accounting fraud, underscored the necessity for stringent regulatory frameworks, leading to significant reforms such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This legislation established rigorous requirements for financial reporting and accountability, aiming to restore public trust and prevent similar fraudulent activities in the future. The enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley introduced mechanisms like mandatory certification of financial statements by CEOs and CFOs, enhanced internal control assessments, and increased penalties for fraudulent practices, fundamentally transforming corporate governance (Cunningham, 2005).

The effectiveness of financial reports hinges significantly on their quality, which is influenced by their relevance, faithful representation, and other qualitative characteristics. Reporting organizations operate under a complex regulatory environment overseen by various bodies such as the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FIRA). FASB, established in 1973, develops accounting standards in the United States, ensuring that financial statements provide relevant information for decision-making. Meanwhile, the SEC, with statutory authority from multiple laws including the Securities Act of 1933 and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, monitors compliance and enforces reporting standards for publicly traded companies. The SEC's role is crucial in maintaining market transparency and investor confidence (SEC, 2012b; 2012c; 2012a).

Internationally, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) develops and promulgates International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), aiming to harmonize accounting practices across borders. The conceptual framework underpinning financial reporting emphasizes fundamental qualitative characteristics such as relevance and faithful representation, alongside enhancing qualities like comparability, timeliness, verifiability, and understandability. These qualities collectively determine the usefulness of financial reports for users, including investors, regulators, and other stakeholders. However, practical limitations such as materiality and cost constraints influence how financial information is presented, sometimes leading to differences between International Financial Reporting Standards and US GAAP (IASB, 2019).

One of the critical concerns in financial reporting is the potential for manipulation or creative accounting tricks designed to present a more favorable financial position. Companies may engage in practices such as false revenue recognition, asset inflation, and misreporting expenses, all of which distort the true financial health of an entity. External audits serve as a vital safeguard against such malpractices, ensuring that financial statements conform to accepted standards and internal controls. Auditing bodies rigorously examine companies' financial records and operational procedures to detect anomalies and prevent fraudulent reporting (Arens, Elder, & Beasley, 2017).

Despite efforts to standardize financial reporting globally, differences remain between US GAAP and IFRS, especially concerning asset valuation, revenue recognition, inventory management, and discontinued operations. These differences can pose challenges for multinational corporations and investors operating across diverse regulatory environments. Harmonization efforts, such as the convergence project between FASB and IFRS, aim to bridge these gaps, but discrepancies still exist (Oxford Analytica, 2009).

The importance of high-quality financial reporting cannot be overstated, as it underpins market stability, investor confidence, and informed decision-making. Regulators and standard-setting bodies must continue to refine frameworks, enforce compliance, and adapt to new challenges posed by complex financial transactions and technological advancements. As the financial landscape evolves, safeguarding the integrity of financial reports remains a collective responsibility vital for economic resilience and transparency.

References

• Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2017). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. Pearson.
• Cunningham, C. (2005). The gain and pain of Sarbanes-Oxley. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2019). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. IASB Publications.
• Oxford Analytica. (2009). Accounting for a difference of opinion. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com
• SEC. (2012a). The Investment Company Act of 1940. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
• SEC. (2012b). The Securities Act of 1933. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
• SEC. (2012c). The Securities Exchange Act of 1934. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
• SEC. (2005). Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
• SEC. (2014). Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
• FASB. (2020). About FASB. Financial Accounting Standards Board.