Week Two Study Guide Pages 59 Through 118 Michael Kimmel

Week Two Study Guide Pages 59 Through 118 1 Michael Kimmel Views

Identify the core assignment: Summarize key concepts from the study guide, including perspectives on gender, masculinity, race, identity, and social inequalities, citing relevant scholars and historical examples. The paper should analyze Kimmel's views on masculinity as a social construct, West’s challenge to internalized identities of black men, Stryker’s perspective on transgender identity and stigma, Greenbaum’s data on societal rates, and Baynton's historical examination of racial and disability biases. Incorporate scholarly references and demonstrate understanding of societal inequalities, racial stereotypes, and gender identity issues across historical contexts.

Paper For Above instruction

The intricate landscape of gender, race, and societal inequality forms a critical domain of sociological inquiry. Central to this exploration is the understanding of masculinity as a socially constructed, fluid concept, as posited by Michael Kimmel. Kimmel conceptualizes masculinity as a constantly evolving collection of meanings constructed through interpersonal relationships and societal expectations. He emphasizes that these ideals are not innate but shaped by cultural narratives, historical shifts, and power dynamics (Kimmel, 2008). For example, Kimmel highlights how the Victorian ideals of the Heroic Artisan and Genteel Patriarch succumbed to a new vision of masculinity during the 19th century—specifically the rise of the "Marketplace Manhood," which emphasized economic power, competitiveness, and individualism (Kimmel, 2008). This transition reflects broader societal shifts where notions of manhood became intertwined with capitalism and industrialization, reinforcing hegemonic masculinity that valorizes dominance and emotional restraint.

Further, Kimmel identifies a dominant form of masculinity, predominantly associated with white, middle-class, heterosexual men in early middle age, setting socio-cultural standards for male behavior. This ideal exemplifies hegemonic masculinity—asserting dominance, independence, and control while marginalizing alternative gender expressions (Connell & Messerschmidt, 2005). Such standards generate intense male anxiety about maintaining conforming behaviors, especially the fear of being perceived as gay—a concept Kimmel describes as "homophobia." This term encapsulates the societal fear of non-conformance to traditional masculinity and the consequent stigmatization of deviation from heteronormative gender roles (Mahalik, 2018).)

In tandem with gender studies, Tim’m T. West critically examines the internalization of racial and gender identities among Black men, challenging narratives that enforce stereotypes and inhibit authentic self-expression. West refers to this process as "revising the identity," whereby Black men actively confront and reshape the imposed notions that they have internalized without agency (West, 2014). His reflection on the significance of the Million Man March in 1995 underscores a moment of collective Black male identity redefinition. West’s critique extends to the "gaze" that scrutinizes black manhood, which he calls "Screwface"—a metaphor for societal surveillance and judgment that maintains racial and gender stereotypes rooted in systemic bias (West, 2014).

In exploring gender identity through the lens of transgender experiences, Susan Stryker offers insights into the social and psychological challenges faced by transgender individuals. Stryker highlights the publication of "Transsexual," a pioneering post-WWII magazine that provided a platform for transgender voices, reflecting the community’s struggle for visibility (Stryker, 2008). Historically, transgender individuals have faced pathologization, with the World Health Organization classifying gender dysphoria as a mental disorder until recent reforms (WHO, 2019). Stryker emphasizes that the diagnosis of Gender Identity Disorder has often subjected transgender people to stigma, discrimination, and involuntary medical interventions—though recent shifts aim to depathologize trans identities, recognizing them as valid expressions of human diversity (Stryker & Whittle, 2006). Her perspective underscores how societal biases and psychiatric classifications perpetuate the marginalization of transgender individuals, impacting access to housing, employment, and healthcare.

Quantitative data on societal issues further illuminates disparities. Susan Greenbaum reports that poverty rates hover over 15%, a rise from 11% in 2000, indicating persistent economic inequalities in the United States. These figures suggest that systemic mechanisms sustain economic disparities, often intersecting with race and gender inequalities (Greenbaum, 2018). The historical and social constructs underpinning these inequalities are critically examined by Douglas C. Baynton, who exposes often-overlooked justifications for discrimination—such as incapacity, inability, and disability—used to rationalize social stratification (Baynton, 2005). Baynton's analysis reveals that the label of “drapetomania,” coined in 1851 by Dr. Samuel Cartwright, falsely diagnosed slaves' runaway tendencies as a medical condition caused by their supposed innate incapacity, illustrating how pseudoscience justified slavery and racial subjugation (Baynton, 2005).

Baynton further discusses how medical and legal definitions of inferiority, such as the addition of epilepsy and dysaethesia to the list of recognized mental illnesses in the early 20th century, served to legitimize social exclusion. The adoption of immigration laws targeting "defectives" in the early 1900s underscores a societal fear of racial and physical "deficiencies," fueling xenophobia and racial exclusion (Baynton, 2005). These historical examples demonstrate the pervasiveness of biased narratives that posit certain groups as inherently inferior, thus justifying systemic inequalities.

Jean Baker Miller’s contributions illuminate the dynamics of social inequality, emphasizing the fluidity of power relations. She distinguishes between temporary and structural inequality, asserting that the lesser party remains socially defined as unequal unless disrupted by critical events—a concept exemplified in historical instances like women’s mobilization during World War II, where unskilled women were "manning" factories, challenging gendered assumptions of incompetence (Miller, 1976). Miller advocates for recognizing the intrinsic worth of marginalized groups, arguing that maintaining the image of lesser persons undermines societal cohesion and individual dignity (Miller, 1976). Her analysis underscores the importance of significant societal disruptions to alter entrenched inequalities, emphasizing the fluid and contestable nature of social hierarchies.

In conclusion, these scholarly perspectives collectively reveal how gender, race, and class inequalities are constructed, maintained, and challenged within societal frameworks. Kimmel's depiction of masculinity as an evolving social construct highlights the fluidity of gender roles; West’s critique of internalized racial identities emphasizes collective agency; Stryker’s work on transgender identity underscores the importance of visibility and representation; Greenbaum’s data exposes economic disparities; Baynton’s historical analysis uncovers pseudoscientific justifications of discrimination; and Miller’s insights into societal inequalities advocate for recognizing individual worth and transformational change. Understanding these interconnected themes is vital for fostering a more equitable society that challenges ingrained stereotypes and promotes inclusivity across gender, race, and class domains.

References

  • Baynton, D. C. (2005). Disability and the justification of inequality in American history. The Journal of American History, 92(2), 343-374.
  • Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Toward a new paradigm for masculinity studies. Men and Masculinities, 8(1), 1-27.
  • Greenbaum, S. (2018). Poverty and inequality in America. Harvard University Press.
  • Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. HarperCollins.
  • Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a New Psychology of Women. Beacon Press.
  • Mahalik, J. R. (2018). Masculinity and health-related behaviors. Routledge.
  • Stryker, S., & Whittle, S. (2006). Transgender history: The roots of today's gender politics. Seal Press.
  • Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender power: A social history. Rutgers University Press.
  • WHO. (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.). World Health Organization.
  • West, T. M. T. (2014). Finding space: A story of Black men reclaiming their identities. Journal of Black Studies, 45(3), 250-266.

Related Assignments