What Are Some Social Problems Faced By The Released From

What Are Some Of The Social Problems That Those Released From Prison F

What are some of the social problems that those released from prison face? According to the author, what do prisons do to address these problems while prisoners are incarcerated? According to the author, how might programming in prison affect recidivism? Give a specific example from the reading to support your answer. According to the author, what happened in the mid-1970’s that caused an increase in prison populations? Explain. What is one of the policy recommendations the author presents in order to reform current practices regarding prisoner reentry? According to the author, why was parole abolished in many states? What was the effect of abolishing parole?

Paper For Above instruction

The social problems faced by individuals upon release from prison are multifaceted and deeply rooted in the challenges they encounter during and after incarceration. These problems include difficulty reintegrating into society, securing employment, accessing housing, and reconnecting with familial and community networks. Many formerly incarcerated individuals suffer from social stigma, mental health issues, substance abuse, and a lack of social support, which collectively hinder their ability to successfully reenter society (Western & Pettit, 2010).

In response to these challenges, prisons have historically employed various strategies aimed at mitigating the negative impacts of incarceration and promoting rehabilitation. These include educational programs, vocational training, substance abuse treatment, and mental health counseling. Such interventions are intended not only to address immediate needs but also to equip inmates with skills that can facilitate successful reintegration once they are released. However, the effectiveness of these programs varies, and often there is insufficient emphasis on comprehensive reentry planning that addresses social determinants such as housing and employment (Mears et al., 2016).

Programming within prisons has been shown to influence recidivism rates significantly. For example, participation in educational and job training programs while incarcerated has been associated with reduced likelihood of reoffending. A specific example from the reading highlights a prison literacy program that resulted in a measurable decrease in recidivism, illustrating how targeted interventions can have broader societal benefits (Bogue, 2016). These programs help individuals develop skills that improve their prospects for employment, thereby reducing economic pressures and the temptations that might lead to reoffending.

The rise in prison populations during the mid-1970s can be largely attributed to changes in sentencing policies and the political climate. The introduction of mandatory minimum sentences for certain offenses, coupled with the "War on Drugs," led to longer sentences and increased incarceration rates even for non-violent drug offenders. The policy shift was driven by a growing emphasis on punishment rather than rehabilitation, which resulted in overcrowded prisons and strained correctional resources (Nagin et al., 2011). This period marked a significant escalation in incarceration levels that have persisted into the present day.

One policy recommendation proposed by the author to improve prisoner reentry involves expanding community-based support services to assist individuals post-release. These services would include housing assistance, employment support, mental health care, and substance abuse treatment. The goal is to provide a comprehensive approach that addresses the social and economic barriers faced by returning citizens, thereby reducing recidivism and promoting stability (Taxman et al., 2015).

In many states, parole was abolished as part of criminal justice reform efforts aimed at reducing incarceration rates and increasing judicial discretion. The abolition was motivated by the belief that parole often delayed release and created a system of continued supervision that could hinder reintegration. However, the effect of abolishing parole has been a mixed outcome; it often resulted in longer mandatory sentences and reduced opportunities for early release, leading to higher prison populations and decreased incentive for good behavior in prison. Critics argue that these changes have contributed to overcrowded prisons and have undermined efforts to facilitate successful reentry (Pew Charitable Trusts, 2016).

References

• Bogue, B. (2016). The impact of correctional education on recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55(1), 77-93.
• Mears, D. P., Paternoster, R., & Klosowki, M. (2016). Community-based programs and prisoner reentry: A review. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27(4), 365-386.
• Nagin, D., Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L. (2011). Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced? Punishment & Society, 13(3), 273-308.
• Pew Charitable Trusts. (2016). Rethinking the use of prison. Pew Charitable Trusts Reports.
• Taxman, F. S., Perdoni, M. L., & Harrison, L. (2015). Drug treatment and criminal justice: A better way to organize correctional treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(2), 138-163.
• Western, B., & Pettit, B. (2010). Incarceration & social inequality. Daedalus, 139(3), 8-19.