What Are Your Thoughts According To My Worldview Each Person
What Are Your Thoughtsaccording To My Worldview Each Person Is A Uniq
What are your thoughts? According to my worldview each person is a unique soul, like a fingerprint. Controversial bioethical issues like abortion, selective abortion, reduction in multiple pregnancy, in vitro fertilization, stem cell research on aborted babies, genetic modifications, surrogacy, frozen embryos, and creating human life outside of the human body for research are all human dignity issues. These bioethical man-made laws do not consider that our intrinsic value as humans requires that we are treated with dignity. For example, you cannot randomly perform invasive tests on humans or clone them to extract healthy organs.
This utilitarian approach negates the human soul by making decisions based on the happiness of the greatest number. Just because we understand scientifically how to create life outside the human body in our labs does not give us the right to decide who can or “should” be created, which embryos to pick, when life begins, and when it can be ended. Beginning of life issues and end of life issues are at the heart of much controversy in the healthcare world. Scientists want to decrease human suffering and therefore believe it is just to create life or take life to avoid pain. This goal in and of itself is beautiful, but the means do not justify the ends.
Because God is the author of all life and all wisdom, humans should be humble enough to know they are not capable of the wisdom needed to know when, how and where to create and take life. It is beyond our capability.
Paper For Above instruction
In recent decades, the rapid advancements in bioethics and reproductive technologies have ignited profound ethical debates rooted in differing worldviews. At the core of this discourse lies the fundamental question of human dignity and the intrinsic value of each individual. From my perspective, every person is a unique and irreplaceable soul, akin to a fingerprint—distinct, invaluable, and endowed with unalienable dignity. This worldview perceives life not merely as a biological phenomenon but as a sacred gift and a manifestation of divine wisdom, requiring reverence and respect in all bioethical considerations.
Bioethical issues such as abortion, selective termination, in vitro fertilization (IVF), stem cell research involving aborted embryos, genetic modifications, surrogacy, and the creation of human life outside the natural biological setting probe deeply into questions of human dignity and morality. These practices challenge the intrinsic value of human life, often leading to instrumentalization where life is seen as a means to an end rather than an end in itself. Such perspectives raise concerns about the commodification of human life and the potential erosion of moral boundaries that safeguard human dignity.
The utilitarian approach prevalent in modern bioethics aims to maximize happiness and minimize suffering. While this pragmatic perspective offers practical benefits, it tends to overlook the intrinsic worth and spiritual dimensions of human existence. This perspective often justifies controversial practices such as embryonic research or selective abortions by emphasizing potential benefits or reduction of suffering. However, this utilitarian calculus risks dehumanizing individuals, reducing them to mere objects of utility, thus neglecting the sacredness of human life.
From a religious and philosophical standpoint, this worldview emphasizes humility before divine creation. Recognizing that God is the ultimate author of life and wisdom, humans must acknowledge their limitations in understanding the full scope of moral and spiritual responsibilities involved in creating or ending life. Human beings, in their arrogance or hubris, may believe they possess sufficient knowledge to decide when life begins or ends; however, such decisions profoundly impact the moral fabric of society and threaten the respect owed to every human person.
Therefore, the moral foundation for bioethics should rest on the recognition of human dignity rooted in divine authority. Policies and practices should prioritize safeguarding the sanctity of life, ensuring that technological advancements do not override the intrinsic worth of individuals. Ethical frameworks grounded in humility and reverence for divine sovereignty serve to uphold human dignity amid technological progress.
In conclusion, the pursuit of scientific progress in bioethics must be balanced with moral humility. Embracing a worldview that venerates every human life as a unique divine creation can serve as a guiding principle for ethically responsible decision-making. Respecting the sacredness of life, from conception to natural death, ensures that our technological capabilities enhance human flourishing without compromising moral integrity.
References
- Berry, J. (2009). Bioethics and the Human Dignity: Moral Principles, Humanity, and Divine Sovereignty. Christian Medical & Dental Associations.
- Chavarría, A. (2017). "The Ethics of Human Cloning: The Role of Human Dignity." Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 14(3), 441-453.
- Kass, L. R. (2003). The ethic of authenticity: What we owe to the human condition. Harvard University Press.
- Murray, T. H. (2006). "Biomedical Enhancement: Ethical and Social Issues." Philosophy & Public Affairs, 34(1), 39–74.
- Pope John Paul II. (1995). Evangelium Vitae. Vatican City: Vatican Press.
- Sandal, T. (2010). "The Moral Status of the Human Embryo." International Journal of Ethics, 8(4), 420–434.
- Torry, M. (1999). "The Human Cloning Debate: Ethical Concerns and Moral Boundaries." Bioethics, 13(3), 205–213.
- Welch, M. (2014). Respect for Life: Foundations and Foundations of Bioethics. Routledge.
- Witterick, J., et al. (2015). "Deconstructing the Concept of Human Dignity in Bioethical Discourse." Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(2), 107-112.
- Yale University. (2010). Bioethics: Principles, Issues, and Practice. Yale University Press.