What Criteria Would You Suggest For Assessing The Staff

What Criteria Would You Suggest Using For Assessing The Staffing Alter

What criteria would you suggest using for assessing the staffing alternatives shown in Exhibit found in Chapter 3 titled: Staffing Alternatives to Deal with Employee Shortages and Surplus. Describe the steps you would follow to create a job description for an administrative assistant position (assume no job description exists). This should include how and where you would collect information, how you would construct it, validate it, and maintain it.

Paper For Above instruction

Creating effective staffing strategies is crucial for organizational success, especially when managing employee shortages or surpluses. In assessing staffing alternatives, organizations must employ comprehensive and systematic criteria to ensure the chosen methods align with their operational goals, budget constraints, and long-term strategic plans. This paper delineates suitable criteria for evaluating staffing alternatives and outlines a structured approach to developing and maintaining a comprehensive job description for an administrative assistant position.

Assessment Criteria for Staffing Alternatives

When evaluating staffing options—such as internal transfers, temporary staffing, outsourcing, or hiring new employees—organizations should consider several criteria to determine their suitability and effectiveness. First, cost implications play a significant role; the selected alternative should align with budget constraints and offer a cost-effective solution, considering both short-term and long-term expenses (Dessler, 2020). Second, organizational fit encompasses how well the staffing option integrates with the company's culture, existing workforce, and operational processes (Brannick et al., 2014). Third, the speed of deployment is critical, especially during employee shortages; alternatives that can be implemented swiftly are often preferred in urgent situations (Gatewood et al., 2016).

Another important criterion is quality of hire or placement; the alternative should ensure that the staffing solution results in competent and suitable personnel (Cascio & Boudreau, 2016). Flexibility or scalability of the staffing option allows organizations to adapt quickly to fluctuating labor needs without excessive costs or disruptions (Cascio & Boudreau, 2016). Furthermore, legal and ethical considerations are paramount; staffing methods must comply with employment laws and promote diversity and fairness (Dessler, 2020). Lastly, long-term strategic alignment ensures that staffing choices support future organizational growth and talent development initiatives (Brannick et al., 2014).

These criteria can be used in a systematic evaluation matrix, where each staffing alternative is scored based on these factors. Such an approach ensures objectivity and facilitates informed decision-making aligned with organizational priorities (Gatewood et al., 2016).

Steps to Develop a Job Description for an Administrative Assistant

Creating a comprehensive job description is fundamental for attracting suitable candidates and establishing clear performance expectations. Assuming no existing description, the following steps should be undertaken:

1. Information Collection: Gather data from multiple sources, including interviews with current administrative staff, supervisors, and other relevant stakeholders, to understand the role's responsibilities and expectations (Snell & Bohlander, 2017). Review organizational charts, current workflows, and related policies to contextualize the position within the organization. Additionally, industry benchmarks and online job boards can provide insights into standard duties and qualifications for similar roles (Lussier & Hendon, 2019).

2. Analysis and Construction: Using collected data, define the primary duties and responsibilities, including administrative tasks like scheduling, correspondence management, and record keeping. Identify the required skills, knowledge, and abilities, such as proficiency in office software, communication skills, and organizational aptitude (Snell & Bohlander, 2017). Craft a clear and concise job title, summary statement, and detailed list of responsibilities and expectations. Incorporate measurable performance criteria where possible, like response time or accuracy levels.

3. Validation: Share the draft job description with stakeholders—such as supervisors and current administrative assistants—to ensure accuracy and completeness. Use feedback to refine the document, focusing on clarity and relevance (Lussier & Hendon, 2019). Confirm whether the outlined responsibilities and qualifications align with organizational needs and strategic objectives. This validation process enhances credibility and mitigates misunderstandings in later recruitment or evaluation stages.

4. Maintenance and Updating: Regularly review the job description to reflect changes in organizational structure, technology, or responsibilities. Establish a schedule—annually or biannually—for updates, and solicit ongoing feedback from incumbents and managers (Snell & Bohlander, 2017). Maintain version control to track revisions and ensure all stakeholders work with the most current information. Proper maintenance ensures the job description remains relevant, supports consistent performance evaluation, and facilitates recruitment efforts.

Conclusion

In summary, organizations must employ thoughtful and comprehensive criteria to evaluate staffing alternatives effectively. These criteria—cost, organizational fit, speed, quality, flexibility, legal considerations, and strategic alignment—ensure staffing decisions support organizational efficiency and growth. When creating a job description, a systematic approach involving information collection, analysis, validation, and ongoing maintenance ensures clarity, relevance, and fairness, ultimately contributing to successful talent management. Proper assessment and well-constructed job descriptions serve as foundational tools in aligning human resources with organizational goals and fostering a productive workforce.

References

  • Brannick, M. T., Levine, E. L., & Morgeson, F. P. (2014). Job and work analysis. Sage Publications.
  • Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). The search for global competence: From international HR to talent management. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 103-114.
  • Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Gatewood, R., Feild, H., & Barrick, M. (2016). Human resource selection (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Lussier, R. N., & Hendon, J. R. (2019). Human resource management: Functions, applications, skill development. Sage Publications.
  • Snell, S., & Bohlander, G. (2017). Principles of human resource management (17th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Related Assignments