What Do You Do To Solve A Problem?

When Faced With A Problem What Do You Do To Solve It

When faced with a problem, what do you do to solve it? This assignment asks you to apply a six-step problem solving process to a specific problem scenario. You will write a paper that presents a synthesis of your ideas about solving the problem using this systematic approach. As Voltaire said, "No problem can withstand the assault of sustained thinking." Your child comes home from school with an assignment sheet for a school project. He / she is very excited about the project and begins work immediately, doing research on the Internet and gathering materials.

You read over the assignment sheet and notice that your child is not including all of the required items in the project, and you have some ideas for how to improve the quality of the presentation. You recently read an article in a parenting magazine about the importance of a child developing responsibility for his/ her own learning. You recall the many ways in which your parents took over your school projects. You, on the other hand, want to encourage your child's confidence in his / her ability to complete a project independently. The next day, you are at the grocery store when you see a parent of a student in your child's class.

That parent has spent over $30 in supplies for the science project and is taking a day off of work to put the pieces of the project together. Review the six-step problem solving process outlined in the webtext, based on the article "The Problem Solving Process" located at: Step One: Define the problem Step Two: Analyze the problem Step Three: Generate options Step Four: Evaluate options Step Five: Make your decision Step Six: Implement and reflect

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you: Define the problem in the scenario that you have chosen. Analyze the problem in the scenario. Generate options for solving the problem in the scenario. Evaluate the options for solving the problem. Decide on the best option for solving the problem. Explain how you will implement the decision made and reflect on whether this option was the most effective.

Paper For Above instruction

The scenario presented revolves around a common parenting dilemma: encouraging a child's independence in completing a school project versus intervening to ensure its quality. The core problem is whether to foster responsibility and confidence in the child or to intervene significantly, risk undermining their learning process, and potentially set a pattern of over-reliance. Applying the six-step problem solving process provides a structured approach to address this issue effectively.

Step One: Define the Problem

The primary problem is whether to allow the child to independently complete the science project, thereby promoting responsibility and confidence, or to intervene and help improve its quality, which might impede the child's development of independence. Another aspect involves the influence of external factors, such as other parents' actions—like the parent who spends money and time making the project for their child—which complicates the decision-making process. The dilemma is balancing the child's growth with the practical expectations of the project requirements and family dynamics.

Step Two: Analyze the Problem

Analyzing the problem involves understanding the potential consequences of both choices. Encouraging independence aligns with educational best practices, fostering self-efficacy and responsibility. However, it might result in a subpar project if the child lacks the skills or motivation. Conversely, stepping in and making the project for the child ensures a high-quality presentation but risks diminishing the child's confidence and learning opportunity and could foster dependency. External influences, such as the described parent who spends money and time, may pressure a parent to intervene excessively, leading to an unbalanced approach. The analysis should also consider the child's current developmental stage, motivation level, and previous experiences with similar tasks.

Step Three: Generate Options

Several options arise from this analysis: First, allow the child to complete the project independently, providing guidance rather than doing it for them. Second, collaborate with the child on the project, offering support but maintaining ownership. Third, set clear expectations and timelines to motivate the child to manage their workload responsibly. Fourth, intervene minimally, only helping with specific aspects the child struggles with, to build skills gradually. Lastly, in extreme cases, temporarily assist more if the child is overwhelmed, but plan to phase out assistance to promote autonomy.

Step Four: Evaluate the Options

Evaluating these options involves weighing their benefits and drawbacks. Full independence fosters responsibility but may lead to an insufficient project if the child is unprepared. Collaborating strikes a balance, promoting learning and responsibility. Setting expectations and timelines enhances motivation and accountability. Minimal assistance encourages skill development without dependency. Excessive intervention may provide immediate success but engenders reliance and undermines growth. Therefore, the most balanced approach appears to be collaborating with the child while setting clear expectations and gradually reducing help to foster independence.

Step Five: Make a Decision

The best decision appears to be adopting a collaborative approach: work with the child to complete the project, guiding and supporting while emphasizing responsibility. This strategy encourages the child's development of problem-solving skills, autonomy, and confidence. It aligns with pedagogical best practices and supports responsible independence. The intervention should be structured, with specific roles assigned to promote ownership, and progress monitored periodically.

Step Six: Implement and Reflect

Implementation involves sitting down with the child to discuss the project requirements, creating a plan, and dividing tasks. Providing guidance on research and presentation skills while allowing the child to execute tasks fosters responsibility. Regular check-ins help assess progress, offering support where necessary but avoiding doing the task outright. Reflection involves evaluating the child's performance and feelings about the process, considering whether the approach enhanced their learning and confidence. If successful, the child will complete the project with a sense of ownership; if not, adjustments can be made to improve future approaches, such as increasing independence gradually or providing more targeted support.

Conclusion

Applying the six-step problem solving process helps parents navigate complex decisions about supporting their children's education. Balancing encouragement and independence through a structured approach ensures the child's growth while managing immediate project needs. This process emphasizes reflective decision-making, fostering skills both for children and parents in problem-solving situations, ultimately promoting responsible learning and confidence.

References

• Blanchard, K., & Johnson, S. (2013). The one minute manager. HarperCollins.
• Gordon, T. (2014). Parent Effectiveness Training. Three Rivers Press.
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
• McLeod, S. (2018). Lev Vygotsky's Social Development Theory. Simply Psychology.