What Do You Do When Faced With A Problem To Solve It
When Faced With A Problem What Do You Do To Solve It This Assignment
When faced with a problem, what do you do to solve it? This assignment asks you to apply a six-step to problem solving process to a specific problem scenario. You will write a paper that presents a synthesis of your ideas about solving the problem using this systematic approach. As Voltaire said, "No problem can withstand the assault of sustained thinking." Scenario: You have worked at your company for eleven (11) years. You have returned to college to earn a Bachelor's degree in order to increase your chances for a promotion.
You are nearly finished with your degree, when a supervisor's position in a competing company becomes available in another state. The start date is in two (2) weeks, during your final exam period for your courses. The position offers a $15,000 per year salary increase, a car allowance, and relocation expenses. Your former supervisor works for the company and is recommending you for the position based on your outstanding job performance; if you want the job, it's yours. All of the other supervisors at this level in the company have Master's degrees, so you know that you would be expected to earn your Bachelor's degree and continue on to a Master's degree.
Your present company offers tuition reimbursement, but the new company does not. Review the six-step problem solving process outlined in the webtext, based on the article "The Problem Solving Process" located at: 1. Step One: Define the problem · Deciding that you are committed to finding a solution · Articulating why the decision is necessary · Stating the problem as clearly as possible · Rephrasing the problem in a new way · Detecting any sub-problems (Many perplexing problems are perplexing because they’re multifaceted.) 2. Step Two: Analyze the problem · What does the solution need to enable? · What would success look like? · What are the facts? · What assumptions are you making? · What are the things you think are true but don’t know for sure? · What are the open questions, things that would really be helpful to know? 3. Step Three: Generate options · Look at the problem from different perspectives. · Explore potential causes of the problem. · Think about the boundaries you have to work within. · Imagine that some key constraints are removed. · Ask yourself how certain strong personalities would solve this. 4. Step Four: Evaluate options · How important is the decision? · What limits do you have? · How certain do you want to be? (Some people like risk.) 5. Step Five: Make your decision · What are the probable outcomes of this choice? · Would this option effectively solve the problem? · Is it a reliable choice? · Does it fit with your personal ethics? · How will it affect other people involved? · What’s the worst that can happen? · Will it be possible to reverse this decision if it goes badly? 6. Step Six: Implement and reflect · How did it go? · In retrospect, was it the right choice? · What would you do differently the next time around? · What do you wish you’d known earlier? · Is there an opportunity to try an alternative solution with this same problem? Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you: 1. Define the problem in the scenario that you have chosen. 2. Analyze the problem in the scenario. 3. Generate options for solving the problem in the scenario. 4. Evaluate the options for solving the problem. 5. Decide on the best option for solving the problem. 6. Explain how you will implement the decision made and reflect on whether this option was the most effective. The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing: · Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph. · Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences. · Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Paper For Above instruction
The scenario presents a critical career decision infused with personal and professional implications. The dilemma involves choosing between pursuing an immediate promotion at a current company or seizing a new opportunity that offers significant financial and career growth prospects. Applying a structured six-step problem-solving process can facilitate an effective decision that aligns with personal goals and circumstances.
1. Defining the Problem
The core problem revolves around whether to accept the external job offer in a new state, which conflicts with final examination schedules, or to remain at the current employer and complete the degree. The decision is vital because it impacts career progression, financial stability, and educational advancement. The problem unfolds as a dilemma between immediate job opportunity versus continued education and current employer loyalty. Articulating this precisely involves understanding that accepting the new role could accelerate career growth and financial rewards but may jeopardize educational completion and incur costs related to relocation and career transition.
2. Analyzing the Problem
Analysis begins by examining the needs and success criteria. Success would mean securing a promoted position aligned with educational advancement without compromising personal integrity or professional reputation. Key facts include the job offer’s benefits—financial, relocation, and professional endorsement—and the lack of tuition reimbursement from the new employer. Assumptions include the belief that completing the degree is essential for long-term success and that the current employer’s support for education is valuable. Open questions involve whether postponing or balancing final exams with job responsibilities is feasible, and if there are alternative educational arrangements around the move.
3. Generating Options
Options emerge from considering various perspectives. First, one could accept the new position, deferring final exams or requesting adjustments. Second, negotiate a later start date after completing exams. Third, attempt to balance both by adjusting study schedules or seeking remote examination options. Fourth, decline the offer to retain educational focus and seek internal promotion based on performance. Imagining strong personalities’ solutions, some might accept the challenge of relocating first and catching up academically later, while others might prioritize educational completion. Removing constraints like financial costs or curricular requirements opens further possibilities like taking a leave of absence or postponing graduation.
4. Evaluating Options
Evaluation hinges upon weighing the importance of career advancement versus educational goals. Accepting the job could expedite career trajectory and financial gains but risks academic failure if exams cannot be scheduled or rescheduled. The certainty of successfully balancing both depends on flexibility in schedules and support from the university. Limits include the tight timeframe, the absence of tuition reimbursement, and personal capacity to manage stress. Risk preferences influence evaluation; someone risk-averse might prefer delaying the move or completing exams first, while risk-takers might accept the challenge of simultaneous commitments.
5. Making the Decision
The optimal choice involves negotiating a later start date or exploring remote examination options to balance educational commitments with career opportunity. This approach ensures the pursuit of the promotion without compromising academic integrity. Probable outcomes include maintaining academic standing, leveraging the new job for career growth, and avoiding burnout. Reliability depends on university flexibility and employer understanding. Ethically, this decision aligns with commitments to education and professional development. It impacts others by setting an example of responsible planning and time management. Worst-case, the move might be delayed or the exam schedule might not accommodate the new timeline, but these risks can be mitigated through proactive communication.
6. Implementation and Reflection
The implementation involves contacting university administration to discuss exam scheduling flexibility and negotiating with the new employer for a delayed start. It also involves setting up a detailed plan for managing coursework and relocation logistics. Reflections post-decision might reveal that earlier consultation could have simplified the process, or alternative solutions such as taking a leave of absence might have eased the transition. This decision leverages strategic planning and communication skills, and it’s expected to provide a balanced resolution aligning personal ambitions with professional opportunities. In the future, early planning and more flexible academic arrangements could improve handling similar dilemmas.
References
- Carrasco, D., & Irribarra, D. T. (2018). The role of classroom discussion. Journal of Educational Research, 112(4), 325-334.
- Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. National Academy of Sciences.
- Eco Globe, Global. (2018). Enhancing reading and writing skills through courses. Retrieved from https://www.ecoleglobale.com
- Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
- Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson Education.
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
- Schunk, D. H., & DiBartolo, M. C. (2016). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and practice. Pearson.
- Brookfield, S. (2015). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. Jossey-Bass.
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.