What Elements Make Up An Effectively Administered Public Org ✓ Solved

```html

What elements make up an effectively administered public orga

What elements make up an effectively administered public organization? How do you measure that effectiveness? What levers do you pull to increase effectiveness? How do you make those decisions? In this course project, you will demonstrate your ability to address these questions by conducting an abbreviated organizational analysis of a public agency of your choice, applying concepts in organizational theory to the practice of administering a public organization. You may use a public agency of which you have personal knowledge, or you may choose any other public agency in which you have an interest.

The project is split into two parts. In the first section of the project, you will begin to assemble a theoretical foundation for your analysis. In the second section of the project, you will fine-tune your theoretical foundation and apply the theoretical principles you've outlined to your organizational analysis of your chosen organization. To successfully complete this project, you will be expected to: 1. Analyze theories of organizational behavior as applied to the field. 2. Evaluate methods of managing and enhancing culture in the workplace based on contemporary theory. 3. Apply theories to organizations to illustrate efficacy in practices. 4. Analyze theories of decision making for application in the public sector. 5. Think critically and communicate effectively in organizational settings.

Project Requirements To achieve a successful project experience and outcome, you are expected to meet the following requirements. Project Component: Organizational Theory Overview In this component of your project you will begin to lay the theoretical foundation of your organizational analysis. The performance criteria that you will use in your organizational analysis include: · Motivation. · Productivity. · Diversity. · Group development. · Team building. · Collaboration and coordination with outside contractors. · Decision making. · Communication processes. · Power and politics. · Organizational culture. For this component of the project, submit a 7–10 page paper in which you provide a theoretical analysis of each of the above elements and their application to public administration.

Your analysis should include: 1. A brief historical overview of the concept. 2. A concise discussion of how the concept functions in the field of public administration, particularly noting any differences between the way it functions in public and private organizations. 3. A list of questions that your research of the concept suggests you should explore in your Organizational Analysis. 4. 3–5 references in support of your analysis of the concept.

Final Project: Organizational Analysis – Unit 4 Assignment – Due 2/7/15 Choose a public agency for evaluation and assessment. This might be an agency that you have personal knowledge of or you may choose any other public agency in which you have an interest. Write an effectiveness audit of this agency. Your audit should be a 10–15 page paper in which you: · Identify and describe the organization you are analyzing. · Briefly describe how and why you will be assessing each of the following performance criteria in your effectiveness audit. · Motivation. · Productivity. · Diversity. · Group development. · Team building. · Collaboration and coordination with outside contractors. · Decision making. · Communication processes. · Power and politics. · Organizational culture.

· Conduct your analysis using the criteria listed above. Analyze and present the results of your audit, noting areas of strengths and weaknesses. Cite the professional literature to support your analysis. · Recommend realistic potential courses of action for improvement. Draw on practical experience and synthesize theoretical applications as part of your evaluation. · What critical decisions would need to be made by senior leadership to support the implementation of these courses of action? How would you, as an organizational consultant, recommend they proceed? Support your discussion with references to the professional literature on decision making.

To achieve a successful project experience and outcome, you are expected to meet the following requirements. · Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message. · APA formatting: Resources and citations should be formatted according to APA (6th Edition) style and formatting . · Length of paper: 10-15 typed double-spaced pages. · Font and font size: Arial, 12 point.

Paper For Above Instructions

In the field of public administration, efficient management is vital for delivering effective services to citizens. A public agency’s capacity to achieve its organizational goals hinges on understanding and implementing theories of organizational behavior, culture, decision-making processes, and performance metrics. This comprehensive analysis will focus on a selected public agency, examining its operations, strategies for enhancing workplace culture, decision-making approaches, and the overall efficacy of its organizational practices.

### Theoretical Analysis of Organizational Behavior

Organizational behavior theories provide critical frameworks for understanding how public agencies operate. Key theories include Systems Theory, which posits that organizations are dynamic and influenced by their interactions with the environment (Katz & Kahn, 1978). An analysis of specific behaviors within the agency—such as motivation, teamwork, and communication—can reveal how these theories manifest in practice.

For instance, motivation can be studied through Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, which differentiates between hygiene factors and motivators (Herzberg et al., 1959). By implementing strategies to enhance motivators, public agencies can elevate employee satisfaction and, consequently, productivity.

### Enhancing Workplace Culture

Workplace culture plays a significant role in organizational effectiveness. Schein’s (2010) model of organizational culture outlines three levels: artifacts, espoused values, and basic assumptions. By mapping these levels against the current culture of the public agency, leaders can identify areas that require change. An effective workplace culture is characterized by collaboration, inclusivity, and open communication.

The implementation of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives can significantly enhance workplace culture. According to Roberson (2006), diverse teams foster innovation and problem-solving capabilities. The public agency's commitment to enhancing diversity would not only meet ethical and legal standards but enrich its operational capabilities.

### Evaluating Decision-Making Processes

Decision-making theories such as Rational Decision-Making and Bounded Rationality provide insights for public administrators facing complex problems (Simon, 1979). An analysis of the agency’s decision-making framework should reflect on how various factors—such as organizational culture, external pressures, and political influences—shape decision outcomes. Empowering staff to participate in decision-making can also improve outcomes and ownership of initiatives.

Public agencies must be prepared to overcome roadblocks in their decision-making processes, typically associated with bureaucratic red tape and limited resources. Applying the concept of Incremental Decision-Making can allow public administrators to make smaller, manageable changes rather than striving for radical transformations, thus enabling practical progress (Lindblom, 1959).

### Metrics for Measuring Effectiveness

To gauge effectiveness, methods such as Balanced Scorecards or Performance Measurement frameworks can be adopted. The criteria to measure organizational effectiveness include motivation, productivity, and how effectively each department collaborates (Kaplan & Norton, 1992). By quantifying these metrics, the public agency can identify strengths and areas needing improvement.

Concisely, the audit must comprehensively use qualitative and quantitative measures to evaluate functionalities like communication processes, power dynamics, and organizational culture. Through interviews, surveys, and performance data, a robust analysis can underpin recommendations for improvement.

### Recommendations and Courses of Action

To enhance effectiveness in the public agency, realistic recommendations include creating a transparent communication strategy, implementing leadership training programs focusing on emotional intelligence, and establishing mentorship initiatives to support employee development. These steps will lead to an empowered workforce capable of collaborating more effectively and pursuing innovation.

Moreover, leadership must prioritize strategic flexibility—enabling rapid adaptation to changes within the political and social environment. Establishing feedback loops can help assess the impact of changes made and reveal areas for continuous improvement.

In conclusion, public agencies must harness organizational behavior theories, cultivate a positive culture, effectively manage decision-making, and apply performance metrics to enhance organizational effectiveness. By taking a systematic approach to evaluate and implement changes, public leaders can drive significant improvements in service delivery and community engagement.

References

  • The Motivation to Work. John Wiley & Sons.
  • The Social Psychology of Organizations. Wiley.
  • Strategic Measurement: Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business Review.
  • Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79-88.
  • Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 25, 1-31.
  • Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  • Models of Thought. Yale University Press.
  • Public Administration Review, 73(1), 122-133.
  • Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 607-624.
  • Public Administration Review, 62(3), 338-351.

```

Related Assignments