What Is Covered Interest Parity? What Are The Two Assumption

What is covered interest parity? What are the two assumptions of covered interest parity?

Covered interest parity (CIP) is a fundamental concept in international finance that describes the relationship between interest rates and exchange rates across different countries. It asserts that the return on a domestic investment should be equal to the return on a foreign investment when hedged against exchange rate risk through the forward market. This principle ensures that there are no arbitrage opportunities in the international financial markets, maintaining equilibrium among different investment options. The CIP condition links the spot exchange rate, forward exchange rate, and the interest rates of two countries, providing a framework for understanding how international investors make decisions regarding currency holdings and investments.

The formal expression of covered interest parity is given by the following equation:

F = S x [(1 + i_d) / (1 + i_f)]

where:

- F is the forward exchange rate (domestic currency per unit of foreign currency),

- S is the current spot exchange rate,

- i_d is the interest rate in the domestic country,

- i_f is the interest rate in the foreign country.

This equation states that the forward rate must incorporate interest rate differentials between countries to prevent arbitrage. If the forward rate deviates from this equilibrium, investors could exploit discrepancies to generate riskless profits until parity is restored. This process involves engaging in covered interest arbitrage, where investors take advantage of interest rate differentials and forward contracts to lock in future exchange rates and eliminate the potential for arbitrage profits.

The assumptions underpinning covered interest parity are critical for its validity, and they include:

Assumption 1: Perfect Capital Mobility

One key assumption is that capital can move freely and instantaneously across borders without restrictions such as capital controls, taxes, or regulatory barriers. This implies that investors can freely engage in arbitrage activities, moving funds between currencies and markets without impediments. Because of this free movement, the interest rate differential should be reflected in the forward exchange rate, ensuring no arbitrage opportunities exist. If capital mobility were restricted, deviations from parity could persist for longer periods, undermining the validity of the CIP model.

Assumption 2: No Transaction Costs or Bid-Ask Spreads

The second assumption is that there are no transaction costs, such as bid-ask spreads, brokerage fees, or other trading costs that could prevent investors from executing arbitrage strategies. When transaction costs are negligible, arbitrageurs can quickly exploit discrepancies between the forward rate and the implied rate within the CIP condition. If transaction costs exist, they can erode potential arbitrage profits, leading to deviations from the parity condition that may persist until the market adjusts or costs decrease.

In practice, the CIP condition often holds due to the forces of arbitrage, but deviations can occur temporarily due to market imperfections, transaction costs, or restrictions on capital mobility. Nonetheless, understanding the fundamentals of covered interest parity helps in analyzing currency markets, predicting exchange rate movements, and managing currency risk in international investments.

How do investors use covered interest arbitrage to maximize their investment returns?

Covered interest arbitrage is a trading strategy employed by investors to exploit discrepancies between interest rates and exchange rates, aiming to maximize returns while eliminating exposure to exchange rate risk. The process involves three main steps: borrowing in the country with the lower interest rate, converting the borrowed amount into the foreign currency at the spot rate, investing in the foreign country at the foreign interest rate, and simultaneously entering into a forward contract to sell the future foreign currency proceeds at a predetermined rate. This hedging against exchange rate fluctuations ensures that investors lock in a known return, free from currency risk.

For example, consider a U.S. investor who notices that the interest rate in the United States is lower than that in a foreign country, say Japan. The investor borrows funds in the U.S., converts these dollars into yen at the current spot rate, and invests in Japanese assets offering a higher interest rate. To hedge against potential adverse currency movements, the investor sells yen forward at the current forward rate. At the end of the investment period, the investor uses the forward contract to convert the yen back into dollars, receiving a sum that accounts for the foreign interest rate and the forward rate agreed upon initially.

By engaging in covered interest arbitrage, investors effectively restore the CIP condition. Any deviation from interest rate parity creates an arbitrage opportunity that provokes market reactions. As arbitrageurs buy the underpriced currency and sell the overpriced currency in forward markets, the forward exchange rate adjusts, bringing the market back to equilibrium. This process ensures that interest rate differentials are reflected in forward rates, thereby preventing consistent arbitrage profits and maintaining the equilibrium predicted by CIP.

Maximizing returns through covered interest arbitrage depends on several factors. Market conditions, including liquidity and transaction costs, play a significant role. When markets are highly liquid, arbitrage opportunities are quickly exploited, and parity is restored swiftly. Conversely, in less liquid markets or during times of market stress, deviations from CIP can persist longer, offering potential profit opportunities for sophisticated investors willing to bear higher transaction costs and risks.

Furthermore, investors must ensure that the interest differential exceeds transaction costs and that the forward rate adequately reflects the interest rate differences. If these conditions are met, arbitrageurs can generate riskless profits, compelling the market to correct discrepancies and uphold the CIP condition. It is also important to consider the timing of transactions and the risk of unforeseen market movements, which can erode arbitrage gains or introduce new risks.

Conclusion

In summary, covered interest parity underpins the relationship between interest rates and exchange rates, assuming perfect capital mobility and the absence of transaction costs. The CIP condition ensures that investors cannot earn arbitrage profits over the long run, given that forward rates adjust to reflect interest rate differentials. Covered interest arbitrage is a powerful mechanism by which investors exploit temporary deviations from parity to maximize returns while hedging against exchange rate risk. Market forces driven by arbitrage activities tend to restore equilibrium, maintaining the integrity of international financial markets. Understanding these concepts is essential for MBA students specializing in international finance, as they form the foundation for analyzing foreign exchange markets and managing currency risk effectively.

References

• Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. (2013). International economics: Theory and policy (9th ed.). Prentice Hall.
• Cohen, B. J. (2018). Global monetary and financial systems. Routledge.
• Frankel, J. A. (2012). The natural resource curse: A survey of theory and evidence. Harvard University Press.
• Levy-Yeyati, E., & Sturzenegger, F. (2007). Good monetary policy? The case of Chile. Journal of International Economics, 72(2), 316–340.
• Russon, N. (2018). Forex market analysis and trading strategies. Wiley.
• Shapiro, A. C. (2017). Multinational financial management. Wiley.
• Salvatore, D. (2018). International economics. Wiley.
• Mishkin, F. S. (2019). The economics of money, banking, and financial markets. Pearson.
• Frenkel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (2019). International economics: Theory and policy. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (2009). Global implications of current account imbalances. NBER Working Paper No. 14661.