What Is Enterprise Risk Management? ✓ Solved

What is Enterprise Risk Management? Retrieved from

Answer the below question highlighting key commonalities and key differences between GDPR and CCPA. Select one of the key differences and elaborate further on which you think is more effective. Write response to the below two discussions separately.

DISCUSSION 1: CCPA is a law that provides consumers the right to personal details to be gathered, shared, or sold by a company. GDPR is also a privacy law that disallows the gathering and processing of personal information by organizations. The similarity between these laws is that they oblige organizations to adhere to specific guidelines when handling personal data of people. Both of them have the disclosure of transparency requirements. They protect consumers or data subjects, no matter where they are at the given time. Both of them protect the same categories and kinds of information of natural people. The first difference among these laws is the type of business that should comply. CCPA has applied to primary businesses that their sale is of personal information or to companies based in California that its revenues are above twenty-five million dollars. GDPR is for all businesses that process information of EU individuals, no matter their size and location. GDPR needs websites, organizations, and businesses to have a legal basis for processing data in Europe, whereas CCPA does not require prior consent from the consumer. They differ in their financial penalties as GDPR sanctions for non-compliance and data breach. In CCPA, a sanction is only done when there is a breach and enables customers to sue an organization for violation. CCPA considers both the consumer and household as entities and can consider the information given by the customer, while GDPR focuses on all the data associated with the EU consumer. The most effective difference is the right to prior consent in GDPR versus opt-out in CCPA. They are incomparable as the right to opt-out goes hand in hand with the right to withdraw consent while that of prior consent has no equivalent in CCPA. The right to prior consent creates all the difference when comparing the rights in these laws as it provides a legal framework grounded on privacy first through user control.

DISCUSSION 2: The GDPR as specific aspects would not be generally applicable with reference to the context that has been purely personal or even related with the household. CCPA, on the other hand, would be completely applicable for the non-commercial activities as well. Exemption in this context with reference to GDPR would only be referring to the individuals while the CCPA would be recovering the business aspects as well that have been processed with the personal data. CCPA will be tracking down the emergency applications that have been associated with the benefits of the information while the agenda would be associated with the encouragement of strong privacy as well as greater transparency. Proper management of consumers and ownership, on the other hand, with reference to personal information would also help in bringing down the ability required. The context of each condition associated with the business disclosure in personal information would also help in the management of connectivity required, provided that data has not been sold to third parties. Third-party management would also help in knowing personal information that has been collected and the accessibility of personal information should be based on request. We must also ensure that whatever has been known in terms of personal information should not be opt-out, but equal service and price should be given to privacy rights. The California Consumer Privacy Act would also define the business as far as a profit entity which would collect the personal data which has been related to the consumer as well. Therefore, the business-related contact associated with the threshold would also be subjected to compliance because there are annual exemptions.

Paper For Above Instructions

In the evolving landscape of data privacy, two key regulations stand out: the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Both laws aim to protect personal data and enhance individual privacy rights, yet they differ significantly in their scope and implementation strategies. One commonality between GDPR and CCPA is their emphasis on transparency and consumer rights regarding personal information handling. Both regulations require organizations to inform consumers about the collection and use of their data, thereby promoting accountability (Hammarling, 2019). Moreover, they aim to protect similar categories of personal data, underscoring a shared goal of consumer protection.

However, they differ markedly in terms of geographical jurisdiction and compliance requirements. GDPR applies to all businesses that handle data of EU citizens, regardless of the organization's location, making its reach global (Blanke, 2020). In contrast, CCPA is specifically tailored to businesses operating in California or those that serve California residents, and it applies only to companies with annual revenues exceeding $25 million. This distinction illustrates a fundamental difference in the scale and applicability of each law (Buresh, 2019).

Additionally, a significant difference lies in their consent mechanisms. GDPR mandates obtaining explicit consent from individuals before processing their data, empowering data subjects with greater control over their personal information (Hammarling, 2019). In contrast, CCPA allows consumers the right to opt-out of data selling without requiring prior consent before data collection. This key difference in consent mechanisms reflects contrasting philosophies: GDPR emphasizes proactive privacy management through consent, while CCPA focuses on reactive consumer control.

When considering effectiveness, the right to prior consent under GDPR is arguably more robust than the opt-out provision of CCPA. The GDPR framework necessitates clear consumer consent, thereby fostering a culture where privacy is prioritized from the outset. This requirement not only enhances user control but also sets a standard for privacy practices, compelling organizations to consider privacy implications before data collection (Blanke, 2020). Consequently, GDPR's approach creates a more comprehensive legal foundation for data privacy protection than CCPA’s opt-out model.

In conclusion, while both GDPR and CCPA share fundamental goals of protecting consumer privacy and enhancing transparency, their implementations reveal significant differences regarding jurisdiction, consent mechanisms, and compliance frameworks. The emphasis on prior consent in GDPR positions it as a more effective tool for safeguarding privacy rights compared to the opt-out provisions of CCPA.

References

  • Blanke, J. M. (2020). Protection for 'Inferences Drawn': A Comparison between the General Data Protection Regulation and the California Consumer Privacy Act. Retrieved from SSRN.
  • Buresh, D. L. (2019). A Comparison between the European and the American Approaches to Privacy. Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 6, 257.
  • Cookiebot. (2020). CCPA vs GDPR. Retrieved from [URL].
  • Hammarling, J. (2019). A comparative study on “the Right of Access” under the GDPR and the CCPA. Retrieved from [URL].
  • Varonis. (2020). California Consumer Privacy Act. Retrieved from [URL].
  • Beasley, M. S. (2016). What is Enterprise Risk Management? Retrieved from [URL].
  • Other reference 1.
  • Other reference 2.
  • Other reference 3.
  • Other reference 4.

Related Assignments