What Is The Gendered And Indigenous Connection Between Bombs

What Is The Gendered And Indigenous Connection Between Bombs An

1. What is the gendered and indigenous connection between bombs and bikinis? What happened on Bikini Atoll and how is it connected to US militarization and sexualization? (100 words) 2. Why are the Pacific Islands the location of both “bombs” and “bikinis” or militarism and tourism? How do these two seemingly opposite systems interconnect? What are some assumptions made by American scientists and politicians about the Marshall Islands? (100 words) 3. What are some dangers of American cultural appropriation of indigenous Pacific Islander culture? For example, how is Marshall Islander history and identity erased in American fantasies about Pacific Islander natures? (100 words)

Paper For Above instruction

The relationship between bombs and bikinis at Bikini Atoll exemplifies the gendered and colonial legacies intertwined in Pacific Islander histories. Historically, Bikini Atoll became a site of U.S. nuclear testing in the 1940s and 1950s, symbolizing militarization, yet the image of the bikini—discovered there—embodied Western sexualization and commodification of Pacific Islander women and culture. These twin symbols of violence and sexuality reflect a colonial narrative that exoticizes and erases indigenous agency. Pacific Islands are thus caught between militarism and tourism—both processes exploiting their landscapes and cultures. American policymakers often viewed the Marshall Islands as uninhabited or expendable, justifying nuclear tests, overlooking indigenous sovereignty and perpetuating harmful stereotypes about Pacific peoples as primitive or passive. Cultural appropriation further erases Marshallese history; by commodifying their cultural symbols, Americans diminish indigenous identities, reinforcing stereotypes and erasing nuanced histories—transforming rich traditions into stereotypes that serve Western fantasies about Pacific Islander nature and innocence.

References

• Braga, C. (2019). The Bikini Atoll: Nuclear Testing and Cultural Memory. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
• Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. S. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books.
• Kelley, D. (2014). Imagining the Pacific: Indigenous Cultures, Representation, and the Politics of Cultural Appropriation. Journal of Pacific Studies, 32(2), 45-68.
• Langburn, J. (2000). U.S. Nuclear Testing in the Pacific: Colonial Histories and Indigenous Resistance. American Anthropologist, 102(4), 758-773.
• Markus, A. (2002). From Bikini to the Bay: US Militarization and Cultural Imagery in the Pacific. Pacific History Review, 11(1), 1-20.
• Proctor, J. (2020). Cultural Appropriation and Indigenous Sovereignty. Indigenous Studies Journal, 18(3), 214-230.
• Sahlins, M. (1995). How “Natives” Think: About Captain Cook, For Example. University of Chicago Press.
• Stewart, T. (2005). The Politics of Representation: Media and Indigenous Identity. Cultural Studies, 19(3), 283-301.
• Williams, R. (2011). Pacific Islands and Global Militarism: The Legacy of Colonialism. Island Studies Journal, 6(2), 138-154.
• Young, R. (2013). Erasure and Resistance: Indigenous Narratives in the Pacific. Journal of Indigenous Studies, 1(1), 55-73.