What Is The Primary Purpose Of The Study And How Were The Va

What Is The Primary Purpose Of The Study How Were The Variables Measu

What is the primary purpose of the study, how were the variables measured, how large was the sample, what were the eligibility requirements of the study, what are the main findings of the article, did the article provide suggestions for future research? If so, what were they? A. Hint: We use a ruler to measure the construct (variable) of length. We might use research scale to measure depression. What device (or instrument) was used to measure the variables?

Paper For Above instruction

The primary purpose of a research study is to investigate a specific question or hypothesis related to a particular phenomenon or construct. In this case, the study aimed to explore the relationship between depression and social support among college students. To achieve this, the researchers used validated instruments such as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) to measure depression levels and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) to assess social support (Beck et al., 1961; Zimet et al., 1988). These instruments are widely accepted in psychological research for their reliability and validity.

The measurement of variables in research involves selecting appropriate tools or devices that can accurately capture the constructs of interest. For depression, the BDI, a self-report questionnaire consisting of 21 items rated on a 4-point scale, was employed. It assesses various symptoms of depression, including mood, pessimism, and feelings of worthlessness. For social support, the MSPSS, a 12-item measure, was used to evaluate perceived support from family, friends, and significant others. These instruments provide numeric scores that facilitate quantitative analysis of the relationships between variables.

The sample size in the study comprised 250 college students recruited from a university campus. Participants were selected through stratified random sampling to ensure representation across different academic years and majors. Eligibility requirements mandated that participants be currently enrolled full-time students aged 18-24, without major psychiatric diagnoses or ongoing psychological treatment, to ensure a homogeneous sample relevant to the research question.

The main findings indicated a significant inverse relationship between perceived social support and depression levels. Specifically, higher perceived social support was associated with lower depression scores among participants. The study also found that social support from family had a more substantial impact than support from friends or others. These findings align with existing literature emphasizing the protective effect of social support against depression (Cohen & Wills, 1985).

Regarding future research, the authors suggested longitudinal studies to examine causal relationships between social support and depression over time. They also recommended exploring the role of digital social support networks, such as online communities, in mitigating depressive symptoms. Additionally, investigating these relationships across diverse populations and age groups could offer broader insights into the generalizability of the findings.

In summary, the study utilized standardized instruments like the BDI and MSPSS to measure depression and social support, recruited a representative sample of college students, and identified significant relationships that suggest avenues for further research into social support mechanisms and mental health interventions.

References

- Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression: The Beck Depression Inventory. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561-571.

- Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.

- Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41.