What Is The Problem? Why Is It Important And Relevant

What is the problem? Why is the problem important and relevant? What would happen if it were not addressed?

The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) model is a problem-solving approach aimed at integrating the latest research findings and best practices into patient care efficiently. The first step involves clearly identifying the problem—understanding what issue exists within clinical practice and why it is significant. Addressing this question helps clinicians recognize the importance of the problem and the potential risks if it remains unaddressed, such as compromised patient safety, decreased quality of care, or organizational inefficiencies.

Understanding the problem's significance involves analyzing its impact on patient outcomes, staff efficiency, and organizational performance. For example, if the problem involves high fall rates among elderly patients, the clinical significance spans increased injury risk, longer hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Without intervention, these adverse outcomes could escalate, leading to diminished patient satisfaction, increased liability, and resource wastage. Addressing the problem early is crucial to improve safety standards, optimize care delivery, and meet regulatory or accreditation requirements.

What is the current practice?

The current practice refers to the existing policies, procedures, and clinical workflows related to the identified problem. It involves observing and analyzing routine practices, assessing adherence to standards, and noting variations in care. For instance, if the problem pertains to medication administration errors, the current practice might include existing protocols for medication checks, nurse staffing levels, and error reporting systems. Understanding the baseline allows for comparison and evaluation of the effectiveness of proposed interventions, as well as identifying gaps that need addressing.

How was the problem identified?

The problem may be identified through various means, including safety and risk management concerns, quality improvement data, unsatisfactory patient or staff outcomes, variations in practice, community standards, unvalidated current practices, or financial concerns. For example, a spike in patient falls may be detected through incident reports, or disparities in clinical outcomes may emerge from organizational data analysis. Recognizing the problem’s source through multiple avenues ensures a comprehensive understanding and validates the need for evidence-based change.

What are the PICO components?

PICO is a framework used to formulate specific clinical questions, comprising four components:

• P (Patient, population, or problem): Identifies the patient group or condition, such as elderly patients with fall risk.
• I (Intervention): Details the proposed action or treatment, such as applying a new fall prevention protocol.
• C (Comparison): Describes alternative strategies or current practices, like standard fall prevention measures.
• O (Outcomes): Defines measurable results, such as reduction in fall rates or injury severity, expressed in rates or percentages.

Initial Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Question

The initial EBP question is typically broad, aiming to explore the existing knowledge about the problem. It is refined through literature review and practical observations. The question may start as a background question—aimed at understanding the general issue—or a foreground question, which specifies the intervention and desired outcomes for targeted evidence collection. This process helps direct the subsequent search for evidence and development of solutions.

List possible search terms, databases to search, and search strategies

Developing effective search strategies involves identifying relevant keywords aligned with the PICO components, selecting appropriate databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, or organizational repositories, and creating systematic search protocols. For example, if investigating fall prevention in elderly patients, suitable search terms might include "falls," "elderly," "geriatric," "fall prevention," "hospital," and "patient safety." Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) enhance search precision, and filters can narrow results to specific publication types, dates, or study designs to optimize evidence gathering.

What evidence must be gathered?

The types of evidence include peer-reviewed publications, clinical guidelines, standards (regulatory or professional), organizational data such as quality improvement metrics, patient and family preferences, and position statements from reputable organizations. Gathering diverse evidence ensures a comprehensive understanding of the problem and supports the development of valid, reliable interventions. For instance, evidence might include research articles on fall reduction strategies, institutional fall statistics, and expert consensus guidelines.

Revised EBP question

The initial broad question often requires refinement based on evidence review. The revised question becomes more focused, incorporating insights gained from literature. For example, shifting from "How to prevent falls?" to "Does implementing a bedside safety assessment reduce falls among elderly hospitalized patients compared to standard care?" This narrow focus enhances the relevance and applicability of evidence findings to clinical practice.

Outcome measurement plan

Measuring the effectiveness of implemented interventions involves defining specific metrics—such as fall rates per 1,000 patient days, medication error incidents, or patient satisfaction scores. Data collection should be systematic, using standardized tools and intervals—e.g., weekly or monthly—and gathering data from reliable sources like incident reports, patient records, or satisfaction surveys. Assigning responsibility for data collection, analysis, and reporting ensures accountability and facilitates continuous quality improvement.

Conclusion

Applying the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model effectively guides clinical decision-making by emphasizing a structured approach to problem identification, evidence gathering, and translation into practice. Clear articulation of the problem's significance, understanding current practices, formulating precise questions, and systematically collecting relevant evidence underpin successful implementation of interventions. Continuous measurement and revision foster a culture of safety, quality, and excellence in patient care, ultimately aligning clinical practices with the best available evidence.

Paper For Above instruction

The integration of evidence-based practice (EBP) in healthcare is fundamental to ensuring high-quality patient care and improving clinical outcomes. The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) model offers a systematic, structured approach that guides healthcare professionals through identifying clinical problems, reviewing pertinent evidence, and translating findings into practice. Central to this process is defining and understanding the problem thoroughly, which involves asking fundamental questions about its significance, the current practice, and how it was identified. These foundational inquiries set the stage for successful EBP initiatives by emphasizing clarity, relevance, and the need for change.

The first step in applying the JHNEBP model involves articulating what the problem is and why it is important. This entails exploring the scope, impact, and potential consequences if the issue remains unaddressed. For example, suppose a hospital notices an increase in patient falls, especially among elderly patients. Recognizing the problem’s significance involves understanding the risk factors contributing to falls, such as environmental hazards or inadequate patient assessments, and contemplating the adverse outcomes, including injuries, increased lengths of stay, and higher healthcare costs. Quantifying the problem—such as a 20% increase in falls over six months—further emphasizes the urgency for intervention. Addressing this issue aligns with patient safety priorities and regulatory standards aimed at reducing harm.

Next, evaluating the current practice is essential. This involves reviewing existing policies, procedures, and routines related to fall prevention, noting deviations or inconsistencies in practice, and observing real-time workflows. For instance, examining if staff routinely perform fall risk assessments on admission, implement prevention strategies, and educate patients about safety measures. By understanding existing practices, clinicians can identify gaps and areas for improvement. This step also includes involving staff and stakeholders to gain insights into practical challenges and potential barriers to change.

The identification process often draws from multiple sources. Safety reports, incident logs, patient complaints, or observed deviations can all signal an underlying problem. In our example, incident reports might reveal a pattern of unassisted falls during certain shifts or in specific units. Data analysis may indicate higher fall rates during nighttime or in units with staffing shortages. Recognizing these signals through a combination of quality improvement data, staff feedback, and patient outcomes ensures a comprehensive understanding of the problem’s root causes and helps prioritize interventions.

Formulating a clear, focused clinical question is crucial. The PICO framework facilitates this by specifying the patient population (e.g., elderly inpatients), the intervention (e.g., implementing a bedside safety assessment), comparison (e.g., current fall prevention protocols), and expected outcomes (e.g., reduction in fall incidence by a specific percentage). Initially, broad background questions—such as “What techniques prevent falls?”—are refined into targeted foreground questions, like “Does implementing a bedside safety checklist reduce falls among elderly hospitalized patients compared to standard care?” This focused inquiry directs the literature search and evidence review process, ensuring relevant and actionable data.

To answer the clinical question effectively, healthcare teams must develop a comprehensive search strategy. This involves selecting appropriate databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase, and utilizing active search terms derived from PICO components. Boolean operators optimize searches; for instance, combining “falls AND elderly AND hospital AND prevention” narrows results. Additional filters, such as publication dates, study designs, or clinical guidelines, refine the evidence pool further. Documenting search strategies enables reproducibility and transparency, key elements of rigorous evidence-based practice.

The type of evidence gathered must be diverse and pertinent. Peer-reviewed research articles, clinical practice guidelines, regulatory standards, organizational data, and patient preferences constitute the evidence base. For example, scientific studies examining fall prevention techniques, organizational incident reports, and expert consensus guidelines form the foundation for developing effective interventions. This multi-faceted approach ensures that practice changes are grounded in robust, credible evidence, accommodating both scientific rigor and contextual applicability.

As the evidence review progresses, the initial broad question often requires refinement. The revised foreground question becomes more focused, integrating insights from the literature. Instead of asking generally about fall prevention, the team might specify “Does a bedside safety checklist reduce falls in elderly inpatients compared to standard care?” This precision hones the focus, facilitates targeted data collection, and enhances the likelihood of successful implementation. The process underscores the dynamic nature of EBP, where questions evolve based on emerging evidence and contextual needs.

Finally, establishing a thorough outcome measurement plan is vital for evaluating intervention effectiveness. Metrics such as fall rates per 1,000 patient days, patient satisfaction scores, or staff compliance rates serve as indicators of success. Data collection should be systematic, utilizing validated tools and occurring at predetermined intervals, such as weekly or monthly. Assigning responsibility for data collection, analysis, and dissemination ensures accountability and supports ongoing quality improvement efforts. By measuring progress rigorously, clinicians can determine whether interventions produce meaningful clinical benefits and adjust strategies as needed.

In conclusion, applying the JHNEBP model involves carefully defining the problem, understanding current practices, formulating precise questions, conducting systematic evidence searches, and establishing measurable outcomes. This comprehensive approach promotes the translation of high-quality evidence into practice, leading to improved patient safety, enhanced care quality, and organizational efficiency. Continuous evaluation and refinement underpin the success of EBP initiatives, fostering a culture of evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organizations.

References

• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Wolters Kluwer Health.
• LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice. Elsevier.
• Stevens, K. R. (2013). The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. Nursing Economics, 31(5), 268–270.
• Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., & Mays, M. Z. (2010). Future of EBP in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(4), 844–850.
• Grimshaw, J. M., et al. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment, 8(6).
• Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2020). How to Improve. IHI.
• American Nurses Association. (2015). Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. ANA.
• Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2019). Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses: Appraisal and Application of Research. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Grol, R., et al. (2013). Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice. John Wiley & Sons.
• True, G. (2019). Translating Evidence into Practice: Strategies for Success. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 9(3), 50–56.