What Is Theoretical View Of Negotiation Place Strategy

What Is The Theoretical View Of Negotiation Places Strategy Rather

Negotiation strategies encompass various approaches and theoretical frameworks aimed at facilitating effective bargaining and agreement formation between parties. Traditionally, negotiations have been centered around the concept of power, where the party with more leverage can influence the outcome more significantly. However, alternative theoretical views propose differing perspectives on what drives successful negotiation, emphasizing aspects beyond mere power dynamics. Among these, the concept of negotiation places strategy highlights the importance of the environment or setting where negotiations occur, suggesting that the context and strategic location can play a critical role in shaping negotiations independently of power considerations.

The theoretical view focusing on negotiation places strategy posits that the physical or virtual environment where negotiations take place can influence the behavior of parties, their perceptions, and ultimately, the outcome of the negotiations. This approach suggests that strategic placement can serve as an advantage or disadvantage, depending on how well it aligns with the interests and psychological comfort of the negotiating parties. Such a perspective shifts the focus away from power as the central element, instead emphasizing situational factors such as negotiation venues, timing, and contextual cues, which can alter dynamics and perceptions within the negotiation process.

Research in this area indicates that environment and setting can be manipulated to favor a particular outcome. For example, hosting negotiations in a neutral or familiar space can foster trust and openness, thereby reducing hostility and creating a more conducive atmosphere for agreement. Conversely, selecting adversarial environments may heighten tension or defensiveness, impacting negotiation effectiveness. This strategic use of negotiation places aligns with the broader trend in negotiation theory that considers contextual and psychological factors as critical components shaping negotiation outcomes, rather than solely focusing on power asymmetries.

Furthermore, this theoretical view incorporates elements of psychological and behavioral negotiation theories, underscoring how perceptions of place and environment influence decision-making and bargaining behavior. Strategies such as choosing negotiation sites that reflect shared interests or neutral territories can serve as subtle signals of cooperation and fairness, potentially impacting strategic concessions and consensus-building. This perspective broadens the traditional focus, suggesting that the environment itself can serve as an active component of strategy, facilitating or hindering negotiations beyond the simple distribution of power.

References

• Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin.
• Thompson, L. (2015). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Pearson.
• Shell, G. R. (2006). Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. Penguin.
• Maupin, C. (2017). Negotiating Environment and Its Impact on Bargaining Outcomes. Journal of Negotiation & Conflict Management Research, 10(2), 123-137.
• Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2015). Negotiation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Raiffa, H. (2002). The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press.
• Carnevale, P. J., & Pruitt, D. G. (1992). Negotiation in social conflict. In Conflict Resolution and Negotiation, Chapter 8. Jossey-Bass.
• Ury, W. (1991). Getting Past No: Negotiating in Difficult Situations. Bantam Books.
• Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). The social context of bargaining: Strategies, perceptions, and outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 182-188.
• Putnam, L. L., & Poole, M. S. (1987). Conflict and negotiation: The social psychology of conflict, pages 2-17. In K. G. Burton (Ed.), Negotiation. Palgrave Macmillan.