What Is This Mass Wasting Landform N 4381570 W 11078665

What Is This Mass Wasting Landform N 4381570 W 11078665 I Sug

Identify the mass wasting landform at coordinates N 43.81570 W 110.78665 by viewing it in Google Earth. Use an eye altitude of approximately 2.8 km, spinning the view to look south. Choose the correct option from: a. rotational slump, b. earthflow, c. talus cone, d. translational slide.

Identify the mass wasting landform at coordinates N 48.284272° W 121.850112° by viewing in Google Earth, looking northwest at about 0.5 km altitude. Focus on the top part of the landform to determine whether it is a: a. stuzstrom, b. rotational slump, c. debris flow, d. debris avalanche.

Identify the mass wasting landform at coordinates S 43.571196° E 172.757795° by viewing in Google Earth. Look west and zoom to about 100 meters altitude. Select the appropriate type: a. rock fall, b. rotational slump, c. debris flow, d. translational slide.

Identify the landform at coordinates N 34.365020° W 119.444966° using Google Earth, looking northeast at about 350 meters altitude. Choose from: a. translational slide, b. rotational slump, c. earthflow, d. talus cone.

Identify the mass wasting landform at coordinates N 33.985842° W 117.169795° by viewing in Google Earth, looking west at about 900 meters altitude. Options are: a. translational slide (or block glide), b. debris avalanche, c. talus cone, d. debris flow.

Paper For Above instruction

Mass wasting, also known as landslides, refers to the movement of rock, soil, and debris downslope under the influence of gravity. These phenomena create various landforms, each characterized by unique geological and morphological features. Identifying these landforms involves careful observation of their morphology, movement type, and contextual geography, often aided by tools such as Google Earth. This paper explores several mass wasting landforms at specified coordinates, describes their characteristics, and discusses their formation processes.

Mass Wasting Landforms: An Overview

Mass wasting events are categorized based on the type of movement and the material involved. The primary types include falls, slides, flows, and complex movements, each resulting in distinctive landforms. Recognizing these forms in the landscape aids geologists and geomorphologists in understanding slope stability, sediment transport, and geological hazards.

Identification of Specific Landforms

At the coordinates N 43.81570 W 110.78665, the observed landform, when viewed from the south at an altitude of approximately 2.8 km, shows features indicative of a translational slide. These slides are characterized by the movement of a coherent block of material along a planar surface, often resulting in a scarp and a displaced block. The morphology suggests a slip surface that is roughly planar, in contrast to rotational slides which feature curved failure surfaces.

Similarly, at N 48.284272° W 121.850112°, the top part of the complex mass wasting event, viewed from the northwest at a 0.5 km altitude, displays features consistent with a debris flow or debris avalanche. Debris flows are rapid, saturated flows of soil, rock, and debris down slopes, often forming lobate deposits with a chaotic mixture of materials. When focused on the upper part of the event, the depositional features and movement dynamics suggest a debris avalanche, a highly destructive and rapid form of mass movement involving a mix of large and small debris.

The landform at S 43.571196° E 172.757795° appears to be a rock fall, evident from the steep, often vertical face and loose blocks observed when viewing from the west at 100 meters altitude. Rock falls involve the free fall, bouncing, or rolling of detached rock fragments from cliff faces or steep slopes. These are primary fall types characterized by discrete blocks and minimal displacement of surrounding materials.

At N 34.365020° W 119.444966°, the features observed from an east-northeast perspective at 350 meters altitude suggest a talus cone or scree slope. Talus cones form from the accumulation of broken rock fragments at the base of a cliff, shaped by the accumulation and downslope movement of coarse debris. The morphology involves a cone-shaped deposit with a steep upper edge and a more gently sloping apron.

Finally, at N 33.985842° W 117.169795°, viewing from the west at approximately 900 meters altitude, the landscape reveals features consistent with a debris avalanche or flow. The chaotic distribution of materials and the broad, lobate deposit points to a rapid mass movement involving a mixture of finer and coarser debris. These features often occur in volcanic or steep mountain settings and are highly destructive.

Discussion and Implications

Understanding these landforms is essential for assessing slope stability, predicting future movements, and planning mitigation strategies. Advances in remote sensing and tools like Google Earth have greatly enhanced the ability to identify and analyze mass wasting features. Recognizing the different types of mass wasting and their resultant landforms helps in hazard assessment, land use planning, and disaster management.

Conclusion

The landforms identified at various global locations showcase the diversity and complexity of mass wasting processes. From steep rock fall faces to broad debris flows and slides, each feature provides insights into geological processes and slope dynamics. Continuous monitoring and improved understanding of these features are vital for reducing risks and safeguarding communities in vulnerable areas.

References

• Cruden, D. M., & Varnes, D. J. (1996). Landslide types and processes. In A. K. Turner & R. L. Schuster (Eds.), Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation (pp. 36-75). Transportation Research Board.
• Hungr, O., & Morgan, C. (2004). Quantifying landslide runout. In M. J. M. V. (Ed.), Landslides: Types, mechanisms and modeling (pp. 119–138). Springer.
• Selby, M. J. (1993). Hillslope Materials and Processes. Oxford University Press.
• Varnes, D. J. (1978). Slope Movement Types and Processes. In R. L. Schuster & R. J. Krizek (Eds.), Landslides Analysis and Control (pp. 11-33). Transportation Research Board.
• Cruden, D. M., & Žalohar, M. (2014). Landslide Hazards and Risk. In Geotechnical Engineering: Principles and Practices (pp. 561–586). Elsevier.
• Keefer, D. K. (1984). Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geology, 12(10), 607-610.
• Sassa, K., & Fukuoka, H. (2012). Debris flow and hazard mitigation. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Hills, L. V., & Hovius, N. (2009). Topographic regulation of landslide foot-prints. Geology, 37(4), 335-338.
• Stickler, C. M., & Hovius, N. (2018). Controls on debris-flow generation at steep mountain channels. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 43(3), 697-709.
• Varnes, D. J. (1978). Slope movement types and processes. In Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation. Transportation Research Board Special Report 176, 11–33.