What Is Your Diagnosis Of The Situation In The Compan 584994

What is your diagnosis of the situation in the company and the accounting department?

Read Case Study 6: The Regency Grand Hotel, Selected Cases of the textbook. Answer, discuss, and examine the following questions: 1. What is your diagnosis of the situation in the company and the accounting department? Use 4 theories from chapters 5-7 in the textbook to diagnose the situation. 2. How would you go about helping Becker determine if empowerment is a good fit for the Regency Grand Hotel? 3. What might a new decision-making process look like at the Regency? How would you expect it to benefit the overall performance of the hotel? 4. How should the Regency transition to self-managed teams if it chooses to go in that direction? Case Study assignment will be 4 pages in length (exclusive of title page, reference page, etc.) and include two levels of headings. Required questions should serve as headings.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The Regency Grand Hotel's recent transition from a traditionally managed, bureaucratic organization to an empowerment-focused workplace has triggered significant operational and cultural challenges. While the aim was to boost employee motivation and service quality, the implementation has led to confusion, decreased performance, and increased staff dissatisfaction. Applying organizational theories from chapters 5-7 of the textbook can offer a structured diagnosis of these issues, and guide strategic adjustments to align practices with organizational goals.

Diagnosis of the Situation Using Organizational Theories

Firstly, Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs theory helps explain the shift in employee motivation. Under the previous management, employees were provided with job security, good wages, and benefits, satisfying their physiological and safety needs, leading to stability and minimal complaints. The introduction of empowerment aimed to enhance esteem and self-actualization needs by providing greater decision-making authority and opportunities for growth. However, the chaos in distinguishing major from minor decisions and the confusion surrounding authority have undermined these needs, leading employees to feel insecure and undervalued, manifesting in high turnover and dissatisfaction.

Secondly, Organizational Structure Theory suggests that the previous bureaucratic organization—characterized by rigid procedures and hierarchical control—was ill-suited for the dynamic and guest-centric environment Becker envisioned. The sudden shift to empowerment strained this structure, which was optimized for control and compliance, not flexibility. Employees formerly relied on clear protocols; the abrupt decentralization disrupted this system, leading to inconsistent service quality and decision-making paralysis.

Thirdly, Contingency Theory emphasizes that organizational effectiveness depends on fitting management practices to context. The hotel’s culture of control and risk aversion suited its prior stability but was incompatible with empowerment, which favors autonomy and innovation. The mismatch caused employees to feel unsupported and uncertain, with many reverting to previous behaviors of conformity to avoid mistakes, diminishing innovation and guest satisfaction.

Finally, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory indicates that dissatisfaction stems from hygiene factors like supervision, company policies, and working conditions. The reduction in bureaucratic rules was expected to improve motivation, yet the resulting role ambiguity and lack of clear oversight caused dissatisfaction and stress among employees. The failure to adequately address hygiene factors led to increased complaints and dissatisfaction, overshadowing the potential motivators of empowerment.

Helping Becker Determine if Empowerment Is a Good Fit

To assess whether empowerment fits the Regency Grand Hotel, a comprehensive diagnostic approach is essential. First, conduct a organizational culture audit to identify prevailing attitudes toward authority, risk, and innovation. This can involve surveys and interviews to gauge employee perceptions about decision-making authority and support systems. Second, implement a pilot empowerment program in specific departments, setting clear boundaries, training supervisors, and establishing performance metrics. Observing the outcomes—such as employee engagement, service quality, and customer complaints—will inform whether empowerment is effective.

Third, perform role clarity assessments to identify confusion regarding decision-making boundaries. Clear definitions, guidelines, and training can help employees understand when and how to exercise autonomy. Fourth, evaluate the leadership style and support mechanisms by analyzing the managers' capacity to coach and facilitate rather than micromanage. If the organizational environment demonstrates openness to trust and learning, empowerment could succeed with proper adjustments.

Additionally, incorporating feedback loops through regular employee forums and customer satisfaction surveys can provide ongoing insights into the program’s impact. This empirical evidence will help Becker decide if empowerment aligns with the hotel’s operational needs and culture.

Designing a New Decision-Making Process for the Regency

A more effective decision-making process would include clear delineation of authority levels and standardized procedures for delegating decisions. Implementing a matrix decision-making framework—where specific types of decisions are assigned to certain roles—can reduce ambiguity and reverse the current confusion. For example, minor guest service decisions could be delegated fully to front-line employees if certain criteria are met, with autonomy supported by training and guidelines.

The process should include structured training programs to enhance employees’ decision-making skills, including scenario-based training to differentiate between major and minor issues. Establishing decision escalation protocols ensures that complex or high-impact problems are escalated appropriately, reducing misuse or over-reliance on management.

Furthermore, adopting a feedback and review system would allow managers to monitor decision quality and provide constructive feedback regularly, fostering a culture of continuous improvement. This structured approach would empower employees while maintaining managerial oversight, leading to better operational consistency and improved customer satisfaction.

Expected benefits include increased efficiency, reduced frustration among staff, improved service quality, and a healthier work environment. Empowered employees who share a clear understanding of their roles are more likely to take initiative, innovate, and respond promptly to guest needs, thereby enhancing overall performance.

Transitioning to Self-Managed Teams

If the Regency decides to implement self-managed teams, a phased approach is advisable. First, identify teams with similar functions that can be grouped based on operational needs and cultural readiness. Conduct team-building workshops focused on shared purpose, roles, and collaborative problem-solving skills.

Next, establish clear team objectives aligned with organizational goals, and define roles and responsibilities explicitly within each team. Providing training and ongoing coaching ensures that team members develop the necessary skills for autonomous operation. It is essential to implement performance measurement systems linked to team outcomes, such as guest satisfaction scores and operational efficiencies.

Management’s role shifts toward facilitation and support rather than direct supervision. Regular team review meetings and open communication channels will foster trust, accountability, and continuous learning. To mitigate resistance, introduce change gradually, starting with pilot teams, and gather feedback before full-scale implementation.

This transition promises several benefits: increased employee engagement and ownership, faster decision-making, innovation, and improved service delivery, all culminating in enhanced organizational performance and competitive advantage.

Conclusion

The case of the Regency Grand Hotel illustrates the importance of aligning organizational structure and culture with management practices. The abrupt shift to empowerment without adequate planning or clarity has resulted in operational inefficiencies and employee dissatisfaction. Applying relevant organizational theories reveals tensions between control and autonomy, emphasizing the need for a tailored, phased approach. Future strategies should emphasize clear decision boundaries, structured training, and gradual transition to self-managed teams, fostering a culture of trust, accountability, and innovation that ultimately enhances the hotel’s performance and guest satisfaction.

References

• Daft, R. L. (2018). Organization Theory and Design. Cengage Learning.
• Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2011). The Motivation to Work. Transaction Publishers.
• Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational Theory, Design, and Change. Pearson.
• Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2020). Management. Pearson.
• Steers, R. M., & Gregory, R. J. (2011). Contemporary Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Thompson, J. D. (2003). Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill.
• Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2015). Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson.
• Zaleznik, A. (2011). Managers and Leaders: Are They Different?. Harvard Business Review.
• Zohar, D. (2010). The Quantum Leader. Jossey-Bass.