What Potential Dilemmas Exist Among The Seven People? ✓ Solved
What Potential Dilemmas Exist Among The Seven People2 Which Group
1. What potential dilemmas exist among the seven people? 2. Which groups are most likely to have the most conflict? Explain.
3. Although Felipe, Manuel, and Lucy are all from the same land, what different views might they have about what is happening? Why?
4. Even though Henry and Luis support U.S. business presence in Costa Rica, can you see them having conflicts about anything?
5. What are the main debates in the above discussion?
6. Should Manuel have taken the land given to him by the state? Why or why not?
7. Should Lucy have done things differently? In your opinion, to whom is she most closely allied?
8. Is Henry Copple’s claim that the problems experienced by Manuel and Lucy “are just growing pains” a valid argument?
9. How should people whose land is taken from them be compensated?
10. What measures should be taken to protect the environment? Should similar measures be taken to protect the workers?
Sample Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The complexities of land conflicts and economic development often lead to dilemmas involving multiple stakeholders. In the context of the scenario involving seven individuals, various potential dilemmas emerge stemming from differing interests, cultural backgrounds, economic positions, and perceptions of justice. These conflicts are exacerbated by divergent views on land use, development, and environmental protection, which are central to understanding the social dynamics at play.
Potential Dilemmas Among the Seven Individuals
Among the seven people, potential dilemmas include conflicting interests regarding land ownership, development, and the distribution of benefits. For instance, Manuel may face moral and legal questions about accepting land from the state, especially if he perceives the land to have been taken unjustly. Lucy's decisions and her alliances reflect her priorities—whether she supports development at any cost or advocates for environmental protection and workers' rights.
Felipe, Manuel, and Lucy, despite sharing a common heritage or location, could have divergent views due to their personal experiences, economic status, and perspectives on tradition versus progress. Such differences can lead to disagreements on how land should be used or preserved.
Henry and Luis, although supporters of U.S. business presence, may face conflicts if economic development leads to environmental degradation or community displacement, highlighting the tension between economic interests and social responsibility.
Groups Most Likely to Experience Conflict
The groups most prone to conflict are those with opposing interests, particularly between landowners, indigenous communities, environmental advocates, and foreign investors. Landowners like Manuel may oppose redevelopment plans, while companies or government entities prioritize economic growth. Environmental groups and local communities may resist projects perceived as damaging to ecological or cultural heritage.
This divergence creates friction that can escalate into conflict, especially when power imbalances favor commercial interests over community rights.
Differences in Views Among Felipe, Manuel, and Lucy
Although Felipe, Manuel, and Lucy originate from the same land, their perspectives differ based on their roles and experiences. Felipe might prioritize cultural preservation, valuing traditions and historical ties to the land. Manuel might focus on gaining economic security or legal rights, especially if he perceives the land as a source of livelihood. Lucy’s viewpoint could depend on her broader social or political alliances, possibly balancing economic development and social justice concerns.
The differences in their views are rooted in their personal backgrounds, economic positions, and their understanding of what is best for their community or heritage.
Potential Conflicts Between Henry and Luis
Henry and Luis both support U.S. business interests in Costa Rica, but conflicts could arise over the scope and impact of these interests. Henry might prioritize streamlined economic gains, while Luis could be concerned about environmental sustainability or social equity. Disagreements may also stem from differing visions of how foreign investment should operate within local contexts.
Thus, even allies within the same overarching support for U.S. presence can have nuanced disagreements about implementation and ethical considerations.
Major Debates in the Discussion
The core debates revolve around the morality and legality of land expropriation, economic development versus environmental and social sustainability, and the equitable distribution of benefits. Critical questions include whether land taken from individuals should be compensated fairly and how to balance industrial growth with conservation efforts.
Additionally, the debate extends to labor rights and whether measures similar to environmental protections should be enacted for workers.
Ethical and Practical Considerations on Land Compensation
People whose land is taken should receive fair compensation, which might include monetary restitution, alternative land, or social benefits. The process must be transparent and equitable to prevent further grievances. Fair compensation addresses concerns of justice and helps maintain social stability.
Protecting the Environment and Workers
Environmental protection measures should include sustainable land use, pollution control, and preservation of biodiversity. Similar protective measures should be extended to workers, ensuring safe working conditions, fair wages, and labor rights. Integrating environmental and social safeguards fosters sustainable development that benefits all stakeholders.
Implementing comprehensive policies, enforcing regulations, and fostering participatory decision-making are crucial steps toward achieving these objectives.
Conclusion
Addressing the dilemmas among the seven individuals requires a nuanced understanding of diverse interests and a commitment to justice and sustainability. Constructive dialogue, fair compensation, and responsible development are essential to resolving conflicts and fostering equitable growth.
References
- Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business.
- Barbuto, J. E. (2015). Ethical Leadership in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 547-560.
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
- Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
- Scott, J. C. (2012). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.
- World Bank. (2020). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. The World Bank.
- Rodrik, D. (2018). Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy. Princeton University Press.
- Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
- United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN Publications.