What Steps Should Have Been Taken Before Money Changed Hands

What steps should have been taken before money changed hands? Is an LLC the best option?

Four friends, Adam, Betty, Camala, and Dwayne, decided to start a night market business operating big events every two weeks. They contributed equal start-up capital but faced issues due to lack of formal agreements and clarity on ownership and management, leading to conflicts and control disputes. This scenario highlights the importance of proper planning and legal structuring before launching a business among friends or family members.

Before any money changed hands, these friends should have undertaken several critical steps to establish a solid foundation for their business partnership. First, they needed to conduct comprehensive discussions and written agreements concerning each member's roles, responsibilities, and expectations. Clarifying the scope of work for each partner, especially in relation to time commitment, was vital since their availability and engagement levels varied significantly. Furthermore, they should have performed a thorough valuation of non-cash contributions such as time, skills, and labor, which are often undervalued but crucial in partnership valuation. For example, Adam's full-time availability and Adam and Betty’s willingness to engage more actively could have been recognized as significant contributions, influencing ownership shares and profit distributions.

Second, they should have engaged legal professionals to draft comprehensive legal documents, including a Partnership Agreement or Operating Agreement. These documents would explicitly define ownership percentages, voting rights, profit sharing, dispute resolution procedures, and procedures for buyouts or exit strategies. An Operating Agreement, particularly for an LLC—which many entrepreneurs prefer for liability protection and flexibility—would have formalized their arrangements and prevented unilateral control or marginalization of minority members like Camala and Dwayne. Such legal documentation is essential, especially since all four contributed capital, but unequal contributions of labor, time, or future commitments could distort ownership and profit-sharing ratios if not properly addressed.

Third, the group should have addressed whether forming an LLC was the optimal structure. An LLC offers flexibility, pass-through taxation, and limited liability—advantages especially relevant for small, startup businesses among friends. However, forming a general partnership might have been more straightforward initially, but it exposes partners to unlimited personal liability. Therefore, an LLC was likely the superior choice, provided it is structured correctly with a written operating agreement. Other options include a corporation; however, with a small group of close friends intending to operate collaboratively, an LLC often provides the most suitable legal and tax advantages. The key is that any business form should be coupled with clear rules and agreements to prevent the issues they later encountered.

Additionally, valuing non-cash contributions—such as time, expertise, and resources—should be a key part of the initial agreements. This recognizes that contributions extend beyond monetary investment and can be as vital for long-term success. For example, Adam’s suitable full-time involvement and Betty’s transition from part-time to full-time work should have been translated into ownership and profit-sharing considerations. Similarly, Camala’s initial involvement, despite her short-term availability, and Dwayne’s limited support, should have been accurately reflected in ownership percentages, perhaps weighted in favor of those contributing more actively or with greater commitment. This ensures fairness and reduces conflicts over ownership and profits post-launch.

Finally, a detailed Operating Agreement or Partnership Agreement would have been necessary to set ground rules. Essential elements should include ownership percentages based on capital and labor contributions, profit and loss allocations, voting rights, dispute resolution procedures, buyout provisions, and restrictions on unilateral control. Including provisions for handling disputes, especially in situations where members’ involvement changes over time, would also be prudent. Such legal frameworks are designed not merely to allocate shares but to prevent conflicts like those that have plagued this scenario.

Analysis of the best legal structure and the importance of proper planning with a Biblical worldview

Regarding the choice of legal structure, an LLC is generally the best option for entrepreneurial ventures among friends, primarily because of its liability protection and operational flexibility. The LLC structure allows members to tailor the operating agreement to reflect their specific contributions, responsibilities, and profit-sharing arrangements. However, the effectiveness of an LLC is contingent upon drafting a comprehensive operating agreement—something this group failed to do—which underscores the importance of legal preparation.

Alternatively, a general partnership could have been considered, but it exposes each partner to unlimited personal liability, a significant risk especially when the business begins to generate substantial revenue and liabilities. A corporation offers limited liability and easier capital raising but might be unnecessarily complex for a small, closely-held business without plans for outside investors. Overall, an LLC strikes the right balance, providing liability protection while allowing flexible management and profit distribution, provided proper legal documentation is established at the outset.

From a biblical worldview, this scenario exemplifies principles of stewardship, fairness, and integrity. Proverbs 11:1 states, "A false balance is an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is his delight," emphasizing fairness in business dealings. The friends’ failure to establish fair and transparent agreements violates the biblical principle of honesty and integrity in commerce. Furthermore, Ephesians 4:25 encourages believers to "speak the truth with his neighbor," reminding entrepreneurs to maintain transparency and truthfulness with partners. Nehemiah 5:1-13 highlights the importance of caring for the vulnerable among us; similarly, in business, protecting the rights and contributions of all partners reflects biblical compassion and justice, preventing greed and selfishness from corrupting business relationships.

Implementing biblical principles would have involved openly communicating expectations, ensuring fairness, and treating partners with respect and justice. Recognizing non-monetary contributions aligns with Genesis 1:26-28, where stewardship of resources includes talents and abilities. Applying such biblical values to business practices fosters trust, cooperation, and long-term sustainability, essential for a healthy partnership.

Conclusion

In conclusion, proper planning before business formation involves clear communication, legal documentation, valuation of contributions, and choosing a suitable legal structure. An LLC, supported by an operating agreement, is an ideal choice, but only if all members agree on and understand the rules. The scenario underscores that neglecting these steps can lead to disputes, loss of trust, and unfair control—issues that could be mitigated through diligent planning and biblical principles of justice, honesty, and stewardship. Business ventures built on these foundations are more likely to sustain growth, fairness, and harmony among partners, reflecting both legal best practices and biblical integrity.

References

• Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of financial management (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Fletcher, R., & Harper, S. (2016). Business law: Text and cases (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R., & Squire, R. (2006). The management of corporate law and governance: An introduction. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 6(2), 229–242.
• Lewis, P. A. (2020). Starting a small business: Legal issues and decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(4), 367–385.
• Miller, R. L., & Jentz, G. A. (2018). Business law today: The essentials (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Corporate governance, employee participation, and motivation in the digital age. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 475–493.
• Proverbs 11:1. Holy Bible, New International Version.
• Galatians 6:7. Holy Bible, New International Version.
• Ecclesiastes 4:9-12. Holy Bible, New International Version.
• Van den Berg, A. (2015). Ethical principles in business: The biblical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 795–809.