What Were The Main Causes Of Difficulties With The Project ✓ Solved

What Were The Main Causes Of The Difficulties with the project at Aux Bons Soins

Implementing an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system at Aux Bons Soins faced numerous challenges rooted in sociotechnical complexities, organizational resistance, and poor strategic planning. The project encountered difficulties primarily because of inadequate user involvement, misalignment between technical and social systems, and a lack of ongoing adaptability throughout the implementation process. Critical to understanding these issues is recognizing that successful technology integration requires more than technical execution; it demands careful attention to organizational culture, user participation, and iterative feedback mechanisms.

One of the most significant causes of difficulty was insufficient involvement of end-users and key stakeholders from the outset. As the sociotechnical perspective emphasizes, technological solutions seldom succeed when designed without considering the social environment into which they are introduced. At Aux Bons Soins, the management either underestimated or overlooked the importance of engaging staff across various departments, which led to resistance and a lack of buy-in. When users are not involved throughout implementation, they often feel alienated or skeptical of new systems, creating formidable barriers to adoption.

Furthermore, the project suffered from a disconnect between the technical and social systems within the organization. This misalignment exacerbated the issues of change management. The technical team focused heavily on deploying the ERP system's features without fully accounting for the existing organizational workflows, culture, or the varying levels of technological proficiency among staff members. This oversight resulted in a system that did not seamlessly integrate into daily operations, leading to frustration and decreased productivity. Sociotechnical theory underscores that system success depends on the harmonious interaction between technical tools and social practices; failure to recognize this interplay hampers effective implementation.

In addition, the project lacked resilience and flexibility to adapt to unforeseen problems or changing circumstances. As the implementation progressed, unexpected technical glitches, personnel turnover, and conflicting priorities emerged, yet the project lacked mechanisms for continuous feedback and iterative improvement. Without resilient processes, the implementation team was unable to course-correct in a timely manner, which compounded existing difficulties. This rigidity is contrary to the sociotechnical principle that change is a perpetual, evolving process requiring ongoing adjustments.

Another root cause was the underestimation of the complexity involved in post-merger integration. The acquisition and merger introduced diverse organizational cultures, systems, and expectations, which created an environment rife with uncertainty and resistance. The leadership failed to sufficiently address these cultural issues or develop a comprehensive change management plan that accounted for the social dynamics at play, thereby hampering the project's progress.

Key Elements That Led to the Success of the Project at Aux Bons Soins

Despite the hurdles, some elements contributed positively to the eventual, albeit limited, success of the ERP implementation at Aux Bons Soins. First, the project benefited from committed leadership that recognized the importance of the technological overhaul. Leaders who understood the necessity of aligning the ERP system with organizational goals provided a guiding vision, which helped motivate staff and maintain focus on strategic objectives.

Second, incremental implementation and the willingness to learn from small-scale successes fostered a culture of continuous improvement. By adopting an iterative approach—breaking down the project into manageable modules—teams could identify issues early, gather feedback, and make necessary adjustments. This aligns with the sociotechnical view that recognizes change as ongoing and emphasizes resilience and responsiveness.

Third, although initial user involvement was lacking, over time, targeted training and engagement initiatives helped increase acceptance and proficiency. These efforts acknowledged that technology is ultimately driven by its users and that their buy-in is critical. Hands-on training, user feedback sessions, and collaborative problem-solving helped bridge the gap between technical design and practical use.

Additionally, the project leveraged external expertise, which proved vital in managing complex technical integrations and mitigating risks. External consultants or specialists brought fresh perspectives, best practices, and technical know-how that elevated the quality of the implementation process and helped address unforeseen challenges.

Finally, the project exemplified the importance of patience and managing expectations. Recognizing that organizational change is an ongoing process allowed the project team to accept setbacks and remain committed to continual improvement, as emphasized by the sociotechnical principle of “incompletion.” This focus on resilience and adaptation created space for learning and over time, improved system acceptance.

Conclusion

The difficulties faced by Aux Bons Soins in implementing their ERP system stemmed largely from inadequate stakeholder involvement, misalignment between technological and social systems, and insufficient flexibility to adapt to evolving circumstances. Effective implementation requires a sociotechnical approach that values continuous feedback, user participation, and cultural sensitivity. Conversely, the project’s success was bolstered by strong leadership, iterative deployment, targeted training, external expertise, and a realistic understanding of change processes. These elements underscored the importance of viewing organizational change not as a one-time event but as an ongoing, dynamic process that demands resilience, collaboration, and adaptability.

References

• Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Cooper, M. B. (2012). Supply Chain Logistics Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Bernier, C., Roy, V., & Brunelle, E. (2006). An ERP Story: Background (A). International Journal of Case Studies in Management, 4(1).
• Bernier, C., Roy, V., & Brunelle, E. (2006). An ERP Story: Troubles Ahead (C). International Journal of Case Studies in Management, 4(1).
• Bernier, C., Roy, V., & Brunelle, E. (2006). An ERP Story: Epilogue (D). International Journal of Case Studies in Management, 4(1).
• Leavitt, H. J. (1965). Applied organizational change in industry: Structural, technological, and human considerations. Journal of Business Administration, 4(1), 3–20.
• Ngai, E. W. T., Law, C. C., & Wat, F. K. T. (2008). A comprehensive review and future perspectives of supply chain risk management research. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 533-549.
• Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63-92.
• Smith, R. E., & Rupp, W. T. (2003). Knowledge management and organizational performance. The International Journal of Business and Management, 3(12), 3-11.
• Venkatraman, N., & Parayitam, S. (2008). The influence of culture on strategic decision making: A theoretical framework and empirical investigation. Management Decision, 46(3), 415-432.
• Walsham, G. (1997). Sociotechnical elsewhere and the future of information systems research. Information Systems Research, 8(4), 347-363.