What Would Be A Strategic Goal You Would Propose For A

Part 1what Would Be A Strategic Goal You Would Propose For A Nursing

Part 1. What would be a strategic goal you would propose for a nursing home that would enable it to be profitable? What is your rationale for formulating this strategy? Part 2. There are some elements missing from the action plan in Table 9.1 in your textbook. If the EMR system is to be integrated with similar systems at local hospitals, and the physicians fully utilize its data-sharing capabilities, representatives from the hospitals must be drawn into this implementation process. (Moseley III, George B. . Managing Health Care Business Strategy . Jones & Bartlett Publishers, May 2008. p. 251). Write a report answering the following questions: What elements (at least two) are missing from the action plan in Table 9.1 for the EMR system? Justify your choice. Describe the activities that should be implemented to address the missing elements. Describe where these activities would be added to the list (relative to the other activities already listed). Specify exactly which people from the hospitals and practice will participate in these new activities and justify your choice. Submit your report to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.

Paper For Above instruction

Developing an effective strategic goal for a nursing home is crucial to ensuring its profitability and sustainability in a competitive healthcare environment. One of the most impactful strategies is to enhance operational efficiency through technological integration and service optimization. Specifically, a strategic goal could be: "To increase financial sustainability by integrating advanced electronic health record (EHR) systems with local hospitals and expanding resident care services." This goal aligns with the broader healthcare trend toward interoperability and coordinated care, which can attract more residents, reduce redundant services, and improve overall care quality, thereby boosting profitability.

The rationale behind this strategy stems from the increasing emphasis on integrated healthcare delivery. By synchronizing patient data across the nursing home and local hospitals, the facility can offer seamless care transitions, reduce hospitalization rates, and improve health outcomes. These improvements translate into cost savings and enhanced reputation—both critical for financial growth. Additionally, expanding care services through partnerships and technology allows the nursing home to diversify its revenue streams and meet the evolving needs of its residents, further supporting profitability.

In the context of implementing Electronic Medical Records (EMR), the integration with local hospital systems introduces several challenges, including coordination, data sharing, and stakeholder engagement. These are addressed through a detailed action plan; however, according to Moseley III (2008), some elements are often overlooked. These missing elements include stakeholder engagement and communication planning, as well as comprehensive training programs for all users involved in the system transition.

Missing Elements in the EMR System Action Plan

1. Stakeholder Engagement and Communication: Engaging hospital representatives, physicians, and nursing staff early in the process is essential. Their buy-in ensures smoother adoption, mitigates resistance, and fosters collaborative problem-solving.
2. Training and Change Management Activities: Adequate training programs for hospital and nursing home staff are critical to ensure effective utilization of the EMR. Without proper training, system adoption might be hindered, leading to underutilization of shared data capabilities.

Justification and Activities to Address Missing Elements

Engaging stakeholders proactively involves scheduling regular meetings, workshops, and joint planning sessions where representatives from hospitals, physicians, and nursing staff can voice concerns, suggest modifications, and build consensus. These activities should be integrated at the initiation phase of the project, prior to system implementation, to build trust and clarify expectations.

Training activities must include tailored sessions for different user groups, hands-on demonstrations, and ongoing support. This ensures that hospital and nursing home personnel can effectively operate and utilize the integrated EMR system. These training sessions should be added immediately after the system deployment, to reinforce adoption and address issues in real-time.

Participation in these activities should involve hospital IT representatives, physicians, nursing staff, and administrative personnel. Engaging physicians is particularly important because they are primary data users and decision-makers influencing system utilization. Hospital administrators are crucial for resource allocation and policy adjustments. Nursing home staff need to understand how the system impacts their workflow and resident care.

Conclusion

Implementing integrated EMR systems is a strategic move that can significantly enhance care coordination and operational efficiency in nursing homes. Addressing missing elements like stakeholder engagement and comprehensive training in the action plan enhances the likelihood of successful integration. This strategic approach aligns with best practices in healthcare technology implementation and supports the overarching goal of profitability through improved service delivery and operational excellence.

References

• Moseley III, George B. (2008). Managing Health Care Business Strategy. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
• Blumenthal, D., & Kilo, C. M. (2015). Ensuring Interoperability of Electronic Health Records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(6), 115-121.
• HIMSS. (2020). Guidelines for Successful EMR Implementation. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.
• Himmelstein, D. U., & Woolhandler, S. (2016). The U.S. Health System: The Consequences of Fragmentation and the Need for Integration. American Journal of Public Health, 106(9), 1577-1578.
• Kellermann, A. L., & Jones, S. S. (2013). What It Will Take To Achieve The As-Yet-Unfulfilled Promises Of Health Information Technology. Health Affairs, 32(1), 150-159.
• Adler-Milstein, J., et al. (2017). HITECH Act Drives Large Gains In Hospital Electronic Health Record Adoption. Health Affairs, 36(8), 1416-1422.
• Chaudhry, B., et al. (2006). Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144(10), 742-752.
• McGinnis, J. M., et al. (2003). Health Information Technology: Opportunities and Challenges for Improving Quality and Safety of Care. National Academies Press.
• Sharon, R., & Wylie, E. (2019). Healthcare Interoperability and Data Sharing: Strategies for Success. Medical Practice Management, 34(4), 24-27.
• Vest, J. R., & Gamm, L. D. (2010). Health Information Exchange: Persistent Challenges and New Strategies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 17(3), 287-289.