What Would You Identify As Our Best Defense Against ✓ Solved

Currently what would you identify as our best defense against chi

1. Currently what would you identify as our best defense against child exploitation on the internet? Be sure to back up your thoughts with sources and citations.

2. What problems might investigators run into when interviewing a victim of child exploitation?

Each response should be between 600 words. A minimum of two peer-reviewed references need to be used in the development of each answer. APA 7th edition citations and references must be used always!

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

Child exploitation on the internet is a pervasive issue that necessitates comprehensive defenses to safeguard minors from potential harm. The rise of digital platforms has created unprecedented opportunities for exploitation, making it critical to implement effective strategies. This paper will analyze the best current defenses against child exploitation online and will also explore the challenges investigators face when interviewing victims of such crimes.

Best Defense Against Child Exploitation Online

One of the most effective defenses against child exploitation on the internet is comprehensive digital literacy education. Empowering children with the knowledge and tools to navigate online spaces safely can significantly reduce their vulnerability. Educational programs that focus on identifying risky situations, understanding privacy settings, and employing healthy digital behaviors are crucial (Livingstone & Haddon, 2009). Evidence demonstrates that children equipped with digital literacy skills are more adept at recognizing and avoiding online exploitation (Gordon & Snider, 2017).

Moreover, parental involvement plays a critical role in minimizing risks related to online exploitation. Parents must engage in conversations with their children about safe online practices and understand the platforms their children are using. Stronger communication can bridge the knowledge gap that often exists between parents and children regarding digital navigation (Stoilova, Lee, & Livingstone, 2020). In this collaborative effort, parents act as guardians while children act as informed users, fostering an environment for safer internet use.

Additionally, law enforcement agencies have been enhancing their investigative techniques and collaborations to combat internet child exploitation. Organizations such as the Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force have established a robust framework for identifying, apprehending, and prosecuting offenders. These task forces utilize state-of-the-art technology, forensic tools, and intelligence-sharing networks to enhance their effectiveness (Dunham & Zieglers, 2020). This multi-agency approach can facilitate better coordination and information sharing, improving overall outcomes for investigations.

Another essential defense is legislative action. Governments worldwide are enacting laws to protect children from online exploitation. The implementation of laws like the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) in the United States serves to create stricter regulations concerning the collection of personal information from minors (Federal Trade Commission, 2013). Such policies ensure that children's rights are safeguarded while interacting online, holding companies accountable for protecting young users on their platforms.

Challenges in Interviewing Victims of Child Exploitation

While strategies are being implemented to prevent child exploitation, investigators often encounter significant challenges when interviewing victims of these crimes. One major obstacle is the emotional and psychological trauma experienced by victims. Many victims may be reluctant to come forward or share their experiences due to fear, shame, or a lack of trust in adults (Finkelhor, 2018). This distrust can result in incomplete narratives, making it difficult for investigators to gather comprehensive information that is essential for building a case.

Furthermore, the age of the victim can greatly influence the investigative process. Younger children may lack the vocabulary or understanding needed to articulate their experiences effectively, while older adolescents may exhibit defensiveness or disengagement during interviews (Stermac, De Luca, & Barylski, 2014). In addition, investigators must be cautious about the techniques they employ, as improper questioning can elicit false memories or lead to additional trauma for the victim.

The legal aspect also introduces challenges, particularly regarding the use of leading questions or suggestive techniques that can taint the validity of a victim's testimony. The legal system demands a high standard of evidence, meaning that investigators must tread carefully to ensure that they do not compromise the integrity of the victim’s account (Hershkowitz, Orbach, & Lamb, 2006). Furthermore, there exists a risk of secondary victimization if investigations and interviews are not handled sensitively, which may discourage other victims from speaking out in the future.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while comprehensive education, parental involvement, technological advances, and legislation form the backbone of defenses against child exploitation online, challenges persist for investigators when interviewing victims. Understanding these complexities is vital for improving investigative outcomes and ensuring that children feel supported and empowered to report their experiences of exploitation. By integrating educational initiatives, law enforcement strategies, and trauma-informed practices, society can make significant strides towards protecting children in the digital age.

References

  • Federal Trade Commission. (2013). Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule (“COPPA”). Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov
  • Finkelhor, D. (2018). The prevention of childhood sexual abuse. Future of Children, 18(2), 183-203.
  • Gordon, D. & Snider, L. (2017). Children, digital media, and the law: Implications for research and policy. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(2).
  • Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Lamb, M. E. (2006). Investigating child sexual abuse: The effects of investigative style on children’s testimony. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(11), 1177-1189.
  • Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). A global perspective on parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 639-659.
  • Stoilova, M., Lee, J., & Livingstone, S. (2020). The role of parents in children’s internet use: Insights from the UK and Denmark. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 25.
  • Dunham, R. & Zieglers, A. (2020). Enhancing teamwork in law enforcement: The Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. Journal of Criminal Justice, 68.
  • Stermac, L., De Luca, R., & Barylski, N. (2014). Victims’ perspectives of the sexual abuse investigation. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23(7), 860-873.
  • Whitaker, C. & DeMeyer, R. (2019). The intersection of online child exploitation and victim psychology. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(3), 445-467.
  • Maras, M.-H., & Petronio, S. (2010). Professionals and child sexual abuse investigations: Working with children and families. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(2), 232-248.

Related Assignments