When Politics And Medical Science Intersect, There Can Be Mu ✓ Solved

When politics and medical science intersect, there can be muc

When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety. In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.

To Prepare: Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy. Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy. Provide a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Which social determinant most affects this policy? Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why.

Paper For Above Instructions

The intersection of political decisions and medical science significantly influences health policy development and implementation. One critical area where this interaction is evident is in the realm of childhood vaccinations. Recent proposed health policies regarding vaccinations have underscored the necessity of using rigorous evidence-based practices to navigate complex societal debates and health challenges. This paper analyzes the proposed policy of making childhood vaccinations mandatory in various regions across the United States, particularly in light of the resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases.

Background of the Proposed Health Policy

The proposed health policy under consideration is the initiative to mandate childhood vaccinations for all school-age children. This policy emerged due to the alarming increase in vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles, mumps, and whooping cough in several states (CDC, 2021). These outbreaks have been linked to declining vaccination rates fueled by misinformation and fears surrounding vaccine safety. During the past five years, various states, including California and New York, have enacted legislation requiring vaccinations for children unless exempted for medical reasons (Gavin, 2020).

Social Determinants Impacting the Policy

One of the most significant social determinants impacting the proposed vaccination policy is public perception of vaccine safety and efficacy, heavily influenced by socioeconomic status, education level, and access to healthcare information. Research shows that individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds may lack access to reliable medical information, making them more susceptible to vaccine hesitancy (Dixon, 2018). Additionally, educational initiatives aimed at increasing awareness and understanding of the benefits of vaccinations are crucial for effectively addressing these disparities.

Evidence Supporting the Proposed Policy

Evidence overwhelmingly supports the efficacy and safety of vaccines, demonstrating that they are essential in preventing disease outbreaks. For instance, the CDC reports that vaccines have successfully eliminated diseases such as polio and have significantly reduced, if not eradicated, the incidence of measles in populations with high vaccination rates (CDC, 2021). Moreover, a study by Opal et al. (2020) highlights that mandatory vaccination policies lead to higher immunization rates and, subsequently, lower morbidity and mortality associated with vaccine-preventable diseases.

The argument for supporting mandatory vaccination policies hinges not only on individual health benefits but also on community health protection. Vaccination is a public health imperative based on the principle of herd immunity, which protects those who cannot be vaccinated due to medical conditions (Fine et al., 2011). By requiring vaccinations, the risk of outbreaks diminishes, ensuring a safer environment for vulnerable populations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the intersection of politics and medical science in health policy, particularly regarding childhood vaccinations, is critical in shaping health outcomes in communities. The proposed policy of mandating vaccinations is backed by extensive evidence indicating its necessity for safeguarding public health. Addressing the social determinants that affect vaccine uptake is crucial for the successful implementation of this policy. Education, awareness campaigns, and ensuring equitable access to healthcare resources will play pivotal roles in overcoming vaccine hesitancy and achieving the objectives of this public health initiative.

References

• CDC. (2021). Vaccination coverage by age 24 months. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-coverage.htm
• Fine, P. E. M., Eames, K. T. D., & Heymann, D. L. (2011). "Herd immunity" – A rough guide. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 52(7), 911-916.
• Dixon, L. (2018). The effects of socioeconomic status on public health. American Journal of Public Health, 108(S5), S324-S329.
• Gavin, L. (2020). State policies on vaccinations and impacts on public health. Public Health Reports, 135(1), 34-41.
• Opal, S. M., et al. (2020). Impact of mandatory vaccination policies on immunization rates. Pediatrics, 145(5), e20201247.
• Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse's guide (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• American Nurses Association. (n.d.). Advocacy resources. Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/our-certifications/advocacy/
• Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.
• Sacristán, J., & Dilla, T. D. (2015). No big data without small data: Learning health care systems begin and end with the individual patient. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(6), 1014-1017.
• Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.