Where In The World Is Evidence-Based Practice March 21, 2010

Where In The World Is Evidence Based Practicemarch 21 2010 Was Not

Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice? March 21, 2010, was not EBP’s date of birth, but it may be the date the approach “grew up” and left home to take on the world. When the Affordable Care Act was passed, it came with a requirement of empirical evidence. Research on EBP increased significantly. Application of EBP spread to allied health professions, education, healthcare technology, and more.

Health organizations began to adopt and promote EBP. In this discussion, you will consider this adoption. You will examine healthcare organization websites and analyze to what extent these organizations use EBP.

To prepare: Review the resources and reflect on the definition and goal of EBP. Choose a professional healthcare organization’s website (e.g., a reimbursing body, an accredited body, or a national initiative).

Explore the website to determine where and to what extent EBP is evident. By Day 3 of Week 1, post a description of the healthcare organization website you reviewed. Describe where, if at all, EBP appears (e.g., the mission, vision, philosophy, and/or goals of the healthcare organization, or in other locations on the website). Then, explain whether this healthcare organization’s work is grounded in EBP and why or why not. Finally, explain whether the information you discovered on the healthcare organization’s website has changed your perception of the healthcare organization. Be specific and provide examples.

Paper For Above instruction

The healthcare organization selected for this analysis is the Joint Commission, a prominent accrediting body for healthcare facilities in the United States. Known primarily for its accreditation and certification programs, the Joint Commission emphasizes the importance of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) as a cornerstone for ensuring high-quality patient care. This paper examines the extent to which EBP is integrated into the organization’s mission, policies, and publicly communicated standards, as well as its overall approach to healthcare accreditation.

The Joint Commission’s mission statement explicitly highlights its commitment to continuously improving health care quality and safety, which inherently involves the application of EBP. For example, the organization’s standards frequently cite the requirement for healthcare organizations to adopt evidence-based interventions and practices. The official website features resources and guidelines that explicitly advocate the use of research findings to inform clinical decisions and operational procedures. Through their standards and accreditation process, the Joint Commission promotes the implementation of EBP by evaluating whether healthcare providers utilize current research evidence to guide patient care and safety protocols.

Moreover, the organization provides numerous resources aimed at healthcare providers, including modules, guidelines, and tools designed to facilitate the integration of EBP into clinical practice. For instance, their "National Patient Safety Goals" explicitly recommend strategies grounded in empirical research to reduce harm and improve patient outcomes. The emphasis on EBP is further reinforced in their accreditation manuals, where hospitals are required to demonstrate ongoing staff education and policy updates aligned with current evidence.

The extent to which the Joint Commission’s work reflects a foundation in EBP is significant. Its accreditation criteria mandate that organizations establish systems for integrating research evidence into policies and clinical protocols. This requirement signifies that EBP is not just an aspirational goal but a practical and integral part of its evaluation process. The organization’s focus on continuous quality improvement through evidence-based metrics shows a firm grounding in scientific research and emphasizes accountability in healthcare practice.

Discovering the extent to which EBP is embedded within the Joint Commission’s standards has positively influenced my perception of the organization. I now recognize that their accreditation process is deeply rooted in promoting scientifically supported practices, which contributes to overall healthcare quality and safety. The explicit references to research, guidelines, and standards aimed at evidence-based interventions demonstrate a commitment to fostering a healthcare environment where clinical decisions are supported by current best evidence rather than tradition or anecdotal experience.

In conclusion, the Joint Commission exemplifies an organization that integrates Evidence-Based Practice into its core functions. Its standards, resources, and accreditation processes reflect a robust emphasis on applying research findings to improve patient outcomes. This commitment indicates that the organization plays a crucial role in advancing the healthcare system toward safer, more effective, and scientifically supported care, reinforcing the essential connection between accreditation and evidence-based healthcare practices.

References

• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2020). About EBP. https://www.ahrq.gov/clinicians-providers/education/curriculum/tools/evidence-based-practice/index.html
• Joint Commission. (2021). Standards for hospitals. https://www.jointcommission.org/standards
• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
• Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72.
• Stevens, K. R. (2013). The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the related health professions. The Ochsner Journal, 13(4), 358–364.
• Titler, M. G. (2008). Evidence for practice: Applying research evidence to practice. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 32(4), 363–371.
• Tricco, A. C., et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473.
• World Health Organization. (2020). Evidence-based health policies. https://www.who.int/evidence/policy/en/
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
• Zerwekh, J., & Garneau, L. L. (2018). Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice. Slack Incorporated.