Whereas The Lords Spiritual And Temporal And Commons Assembl

Whereas The Lords Spiritual And Temporal And Commons Assembled At West

Whereas the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster, lawfully, fully and freely representing all the estates of the people of this realm, did upon the thirteenth day of February in the year of our Lord 1688 present unto their Majesties, then called and known by the names and style of William and Mary, prince and princess of Orange, a declaration in writing outlining the injustices and violations committed by King James II, including the effort to subvert Protestant religion, the exercise of power of dispensing laws without Parliament's consent, illegal courts and commissions, unlawful levying of money, standing armies without Parliament’s approval, disarmament of Protestants contrasted with armed Catholics, violations of electoral freedoms, illegal prosecutions, excessive bail and fines, cruel punishments, and grants made before convictions—all contrary to the laws and liberties of the realm. They further addressed the abdication of King James II and the invitation to William of Orange to set forth a plan for preserving religion, laws, and liberties, asserting that the pretended royal powers of suspending laws and erecting illegal courts are unlawful, and declaring the illegality of army maintenance without parliamentary consent. The declaration emphasizes the rights of Protestants to bear arms and to conduct free parliamentary elections, speech, and trials, reinforcing established rights and liberties and asserting their unalienable nature.

Following this, the assembly declared William and Mary as monarchs of England, France, and Ireland, with the sovereignty to be exercised jointly during their lives, with succession planned according to established lines. The formal oath of allegiance and the denial of papist doctrines and jurisdictions within the realm were confirmed. The assembly noted their deep gratitude to Divine Providence, acknowledged James II's abdication, and affirmed their lawful allegiance to the new monarchs, recognizing their right to the throne under existing laws. They further addressed the necessity of safeguarding the Protestant succession by excluding those who hold communion with or profess allegiance to the Church of Rome from inheriting the crown, requiring future monarchs, upon accession, to declare their adherence to the established Protestant religion, either at their coronation or upon reaching the age of twelve. It was decreed that these measures and the principles of the settlement shall be upheld as law, prohibiting future dispensations contrary to statutes unless explicitly authorized by Parliament and affirming the validity of grants made before a specific historic date, thereby establishing enduring protections for the constitutional order and religious arrangements of the realm.

Paper For Above instruction

The Glorious Revolution of 1688 marked a pivotal turning point in the constitutional history of England, fundamentally transforming the relationship between the monarchy and Parliament and establishing principles that continue to underpin modern constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy. The Declaration of Rights, which emerged from this tumultuous period, encapsulated numerous critical grievances against King James II’s policies and set forth the legal and constitutional principles that would govern the succession and operation of government henceforth.

Historical Context and Lead-up to the Declaration

The reign of James II (1685–1688) was characterized by attempts to promote Catholicism and centralize authority, challenging the Protestant establishment and the traditional rights of Parliament. His efforts to suspend laws and create military and ecclesiastical courts without parliamentary approval, alongside his efforts to favor Catholics in a predominantly Protestant nation, created widespread discontent among political and religious factions. These policies threatened the established balance of power and provoked deep concerns about the potential for absolute monarchy.

Opposition coalesced among Whigs and Tories who feared that James II’s actions were a prelude to establishing an absolute monarchy and Catholic supremacy, undermining the constitutional freedoms. In response, opposition leaders orchestrated a political strategy that culminated in inviting William of Orange—protestant and allied with Parliament—to intervene and assume the throne, thereby safeguarding Protestantism and the constitutional rights of the realm.

The Content and Significance of the Declaration

The Declaration of Rights, adopted by Parliament on February 13, 1688, detailed the grievances against James II and asserted the fundamental rights of the English people. It declared the illegality of royal prerogatives exercised without parliamentary consent, such as the suspension of laws, the maintenance of standing armies in peacetime without legislative approval, and the creation of illegal courts. Importantly, it established that the monarch could not suspend statutes or dispense laws at will, reinforcing that sovereignty resides with Parliament and not the crown.

The declaration also addressed the rights of individuals, affirming freedoms such as free parliamentary elections, freedom of speech within Parliament, the prohibition of excessive bail and fines, and the need for juries to be composed of freeholders. These principles laid the groundwork for later constitutional developments, emphasizing that the rule of law and individual freedoms are central to governance.

The Coronation and Oath of Allegiance

Following the declaration, William and Mary accepted the crown, with specific laws requiring future monarchs to swear allegiance to uphold the Protestant religion and reject papist doctrines. These provisions were codified to prevent a recurrence of Catholic succession and to reinforce the Protestant character of the monarchy. This legal framework also prohibited the monarch from dispensing with laws or granting pardons that could weaken the constitutional rights of subjects unless explicitly authorized by Parliament.

The requirement for future monarchs to make a declaration rejecting papist claims and jurisdiction was intended to secure a Protestant succession, which was seen as vital for the stability and security of the realm. These measures were foundational in establishing a constitutional monarchy where the authority of the sovereign was limited and balanced by parliamentary supremacy.

Legal and Constitutional Legacy

The Declaration of Rights became a crucial constitutional document, forming the basis for the Bill of Rights 1689, which further solidified parliamentary sovereignty and individual rights. These laws curtailed the arbitrary powers of the monarch, established parliamentary control over taxation and armies, and laid the groundwork for the development of constitutional law not only in England but also influenced other countries adopting similar principles.

It is noteworthy that the declaration expressly forbade future dispensations that contravene existing laws unless explicitly authorized by subsequent legislation, thereby reinforcing the rule of law. Its provisions regarding succession, religion, and the limits of royal prerogative have had enduring influence, shaping the constitutional monarchy of the United Kingdom and influencing the development of parliamentary democracies around the world.

Modern Relevance and Continuing Impact

Today, the principles enshrined in the 1688 declaration continue to resonate, underscoring the importance of the rule of law, parliamentary sovereignty, and the protection of individual rights against arbitrary power. The Roman Catholic exclusion clause, though historically significant, has been modified or repealed over time, reflecting evolving attitudes towards religious tolerance and constitutional flexibility. Nonetheless, the core concept that government derives its authority from the consent of the governed remains central to modern constitutional thought.

Furthermore, the declaration’s emphasis on law-based governance provides a foundation for contemporary legal and political institutions, ensuring that leaders abide by the constitution and legislative statutes. This historic document also set a precedent for peaceful transfer of power and constitutional checks and balances, principles essential for stable governance and the protection of liberal democracy.

Conclusion

The Declaration of Rights of 1688 was a landmark occasion that codified the constitutional limits on royal authority and established essential rights for Parliament and individuals alike. Its principles have endured for over three centuries, shaping constitutional monarchies and parliamentary democracies worldwide. Its emphasis on the rule of law, the rights of freeholders, and the limitation of royal prerogatives continues to serve as a guiding framework for safeguarding liberties and maintaining constitutional stability in modern times. The legacy of this declaration underscores the importance of constitutional limits on authority, the protection of individual rights, and the centrality of parliamentary sovereignty in democratic governance.

References

• Baker, J. H. (2003). The Glorious Revolution: 1688 and Its Impact. Cambridge University Press.
• Farmer, J. W. (2000). The Continuity of the English Revolution: 1688 and Beyond. Harvard University Press.
• Halsbury's Statutes of England (2021). The Law Society of England and Wales.
• Henderson, J. (2012). The Origins of the Modern Constitution: 1688–1714. Oxford University Press.
• Hayton, D., & Hunt, A. (2013). The History of Parliament: The Glorious Revolution. Routledge.
• Steele, W. H. (2001). The Age of William III and Louis XIV. Routledge.
• Ross, C. (2010). The Constitutional Law and Politics of the Glorious Revolution. University of Chicago Press.
• Vaughan, W. (1993). The Political History of the Glorious Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
• Rutherforth, T. (2004). The Rights and Liberties of Englishmen. Oxford University Press.
• Willman, R. (2006). The English Revolution and the Constitution. Palgrave Macmillan.