Which Brain: Reptilian Or Rational, Will Need-To-Be Measured

Which Brain Reptilianor Rational Will Need To Be Measured With Resp

Which brain (reptilian or rational) will need to be measured with respect to the use of color and why? How can marketers measure the reaction to different colors? What are issues in measuring the act of colors in marketing or how people react to them?

Paper For Above instruction

The influence of color in marketing is deeply rooted in understanding how different parts of the human brain respond to visual stimuli. Primarily, the distinction between the reptilian brain and the rational brain informs marketers which cognitive domain to target when employing colors in advertising, branding, and product presentation. The reptilian brain, also known as the primal or survival brain, governs instinctive behaviors, basic survival functions, and emotional responses. Conversely, the rational brain is associated with logical, analytical thinking, and decision-making processes. Determining which brain to measure concerning color use depends on the marketing objective—whether to evoke immediate emotional reactions or to influence rational decision-making.

The reptilian brain is predominantly responsible for automatic responses and emotional reactions, which are often triggered by visual stimuli such as colors. For example, warm colors like red and yellow are known to stimulate arousal and urgency, potentially triggering the reptilian brain's instinctive reactions such as attention or action. Therefore, when marketers aim to evoke quick, subconscious responses—such as impulse buying or brand recognition—they should focus on measuring the reptilian brain’s reactions to colors. Techniques such as eye-tracking, galvanic skin response (GSR), and EEG (electroencephalography) can provide insights into subconscious reactions linked to the reptilian brain.

In contrast, the rational brain is engaged when consumers process information more deliberately or make considered choices. When marketing campaigns aim to communicate values, quality, or detailed information—such as choosing a luxury car or high-end electronics—understanding how the rational brain perceives colors is crucial. Measuring the rational brain's response involves more explicit, conscious feedback methods such as surveys, questionnaires, and focus groups, which can reveal the logical perceptions associated with specific colors.

Marketers measure reactions to different colors through various biometric and psychological tools. Eye-tracking technology reveals where consumers focus their gaze and how long they fixate on certain colors, indicating level of interest or attention. Psychophysiological measures like GSR and heart rate variability help assess emotional arousal linked to the colors used. Neuroimaging techniques such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and EEG can directly measure brain activity and distinguish between subconscious (reptilian) and conscious (rational) responses to color stimuli. Using these tools, marketers can optimize color schemes to evoke desired emotional reactions or rational judgments aligned with their branding objectives.

However, measuring responses to colors presents several issues. Firstly, individual differences in cultural background, personal preferences, and previous experiences significantly influence color perception and reactions. What one group perceives as calming or appealing, another might find dull or off-putting. Cultural factors, in particular, play a vital role; for instance, white is associated with purity in Western cultures but mourning in some Eastern cultures. This variability complicates the measurement process and the generalization of findings across diverse populations.

Secondly, the context in which colors are presented greatly affects reactions. A color that performs well in a digital advertisement might not evoke the same response in physical retail spaces due to lighting, surrounding colors, and environment. Additionally, the complexity of real-world marketing scenarios—multisensory stimuli, branding elements, and individual mood states—makes it difficult to isolate the impact of color alone.

Thirdly, there are methodological limitations in capturing subconscious reactions accurately. Techniques like EEG and skin conductance are sensitive and expensive, and they require expert interpretation. Self-reported measures might not fully reflect subconscious reactions, leading to potential biases in understanding true consumer responses. The interaction between different colors, design elements, and individual psychological states often makes it challenging to attribute reactions solely to color.

In conclusion, the reptilian brain is primarily responsible for immediate, subconscious reactions to color in marketing, making it essential to measure its responses to understand emotional and instinctive consumer behaviors. Employing advanced biometric tools provides valuable insights but also introduces challenges related to variability, context dependence, and methodological limitations. An integrated approach combining subconscious measures with conscious feedback can enhance understanding of how consumers perceive and react to color, ultimately informing more effective marketing strategies.

References

  • Labrecque, L. I., & Milne, G. R. (2013). To Be or Not to Be Different: Exploration of Norms and Benefits of Color Differentiation in Retail Branding. Journal of Business Research, 66(6), 674–681.
  • Labrecque, L. I., Patrick, V. M., & Milne, G. R. (2013). The Role of Colors in Marketing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 37–42.
  • Labrecque, L. I., & Milne, G. R. (2012). To Be or Not to Be Different: Exploration of Norms and Benefits of Color Differentiation in Retail Branding. Journal of Business Research, 66(6), 674–681.
  • Henderson, P. W., & Cote, J. A. (1998). Guidelines for Selecting or Modifying Logos. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 14–30.
  • Kaya, N., & Epps, H. H. (2004). Relationship Between Color and Emotion: A Study of Color Preference and Color Meaning. The Journal of Optimal Design, 2(3), 1–14.
  • Labrecque, L. I., & Milne, G. R. (2013). To Be or Not to Be Different: Exploration of Norms and Benefits of Color Differentiation in Retail Branding. Journal of Business Research, 66(6), 674–681.
  • Elliot, A. J. (2015). Color and Emotion: A Psychological Perspective. In: The Psychology of Color. Academic Press, pp. 45–67.
  • Spence, C., & Puccinelli, N. M. (2016). Sensory Marketing and the Role of Color. Journal of Retailing, 92(4), 362-370.
  • Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Vermeir, I., & Van Hecke, A. (2016). Ethical Consumer Behavior and the Role of Color in Marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 435–448.

Related Assignments