Which Of The Following Is Not Another Name For Gain Sharing

Which Of The Following Is Not Another Name For Gain Sharingimpros

Identify the question: Which of the following is NOT another name for gain sharing? Options include Improshare, The Rucker plan, The Scanlon plan, and Control-based compensation.

Additionally, review related elements of employee compensation such as gain sharing plans, open pay systems, legal regulations, insurance, pension plans, and other HR-related topics such as pay equity, healthcare costs, and benefits design.

Paper For Above instruction

Gain sharing is a widespread approach to performance management that aims to motivate employees by sharing with them the financial gains achieved from increased productivity or efficiency. Various terminology has been used to describe similar incentive plans, but it is crucial to recognize the distinct or overlapping concepts these names represent. Notably, among the options provided—Improshare, The Rucker plan, The Scanlon plan, and Control-based compensation—most references align with formal gain sharing programs, with the exception of Control-based compensation, which is not commonly recognized as a term for gain sharing. This indicates that Control-based compensation is the correct answer for the question of which is not another name for gain sharing.

Gain sharing plans typically involve several core elements, including an involvement system that encourages employee participation, financial bonuses that reward performance, an internal equity philosophy that maintains fairness, and a cooperative organizational culture. These elements work synergistically to foster motivation and collective effort. However, the element that is generally not associated with gain sharing is an internal equity focus, which refers more to pay fairness within the organization rather than performance-based incentives.

Open pay systems, which emphasize transparency and employee involvement in compensation decisions, tend to work best when there is alignment with the business strategy, especially when effort and performance have a clear relationship over time. Such systems thrive when job performance can be objectively measured, enabling companies to fairly allocate rewards based on quantifiable results. This contrasts with systems that rely heavily on union negotiations or subjective performance assessments, which can complicate transparency and fairness.

The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 was primarily enacted to improve corporate governance and accountability following high-profile scandals. It emphasizes accountability by requiring executives to forfeit bonus and profit-sharing benefits if company disclosures are misleading, and mandates companies to seek repayment of incentives paid based on inaccurate or misleading financial statements. This legislation aimed to restore investor confidence by increasing transparency and accountability in financial reporting.

Employee benefits coverage, especially for unforeseen circumstances such as death or disability, includes provisions like accident death supplements and disability benefits that provide financial support when employees face life-altering events. These benefits are essential for protecting employees and their families from catastrophic financial burdens, especially in cases of accidental death or disability impacting their ability to work. Disability coverage, specifically, offers a range of benefits that supplement regular income when employees are unable to perform their primary occupational tasks.

In the U.S., employment laws such as the Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) protect employee rights, including wage discussions—presumably under the scope of protected concerted activities. The National Labor Relations Act (1935) specifically safeguards workers’ rights to engage in collective bargaining and wage discussions, fostering a fair labor environment. Such protections are critical for ensuring that employees can discuss wages and working conditions without fear of retaliation, promoting transparency and fairness in compensation.

Regarding retirement and pension plans, the federal system covers a significant portion of the workforce through programs like Social Security and employer-sponsored retirement plans. Defined-benefit plans promise a specified pension based on salary and years of service, representing a traditional approach to retirement benefits rooted in guarantee and security for employees. Conversely, defined-contribution plans, such as 401(k)s, allocate contributions to individual accounts, highly influenced by market performance and employee contributions. The U.S. government also established the first national minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, setting a legal baseline to protect workers from unduly low wages.

Pay compression occurs when narrow pay ratios exist between jobs or pay grades within an organization, often caused by wage increase policies, market pressures, or internal pay decisions. This phenomenon diminishes differentiation across roles, which can negatively impact motivation and perceptions of fairness. Conversely, pay secrecy refers to the practice of keeping compensation details confidential, which can affect perceptions of equity but is not directly related to pay compression.

Organizations develop comprehensive reward systems that encompass monetary and non-monetary rewards aligned with organizational objectives and individual employee needs. Such systems include competitive compensation, recognition programs, career development opportunities, and work-life balance initiatives. A well-designed organizational reward system strives to integrate various employee desires into an overall strategy that incentivizes performance and enhances engagement.

Rising healthcare costs in the United States result from several factors, including an aging population, increasing obesity rates, and higher prices for medical services and prescription drugs. These drivers contribute to escalating insurance premiums and reduce accessibility for many Americans. Addressing this trend requires multifaceted approaches, including healthcare policy reforms, preventative care initiatives, and price transparency measures.

Labor economics principles emphasize that unless an employee's productivity—measured by the value they generate—meets or exceeds their wages, it is inefficient to employ them. The theory of marginal productivity asserts that wages should correspond to the additional value contributed by each worker, guiding fair compensation practices and employment decisions. This concept underscores the link between individual performance and remuneration in assessing labor market efficiency.

Legal statutes such as ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) regulate private-sector retirement plans, including noncontributory plans where employer contributions finance the pension. ERISA covers employees over 21 with at least one year of service, ensuring minimum standards for plan funding, vesting, and disclosures. It aims to protect employee retirement savings and ensure provision of promised benefits.

Bridging organizational objectives with employee expectations involves developing reward and recognition systems that motivate employees while aligning with the company's strategic goals. Such systems, often termed organizational reward systems, integrate performance incentives, benefits, and recognition mechanisms to foster organizational commitment and individual motivation—crucial for achieving long-term success.

Fairness perceptions, both in terms of distribution and procedural justice, influence how employees view reward systems. Equity theory suggests individuals assess the fairness of their rewards based on inputs and outputs compared to others. Distributions reflecting fairness, consistency, and transparency are essential for motivating employees and maintaining organizational harmony.

Retirement pay, cost shifting, short-term disability, and severance pay are forms of employee benefits that organizations offer, although not all are legally mandated. Severance pay, for example, is usually a voluntary benefit contingent on company policy, whereas unemployment compensation is mandated. The legal requirement of specific benefits depends on jurisdiction and industry regulations.

The gatekeeper in a managed care health insurance plan is typically the primary care physician, who coordinates patient care and authorizes referrals, tests, or specialist visits. This role is central to controlling costs and ensuring appropriate utilization of healthcare resources, emphasizing preventive care and managed treatment pathways.

A common challenge with team incentive programs is ensuring equitable motivation among team members. While team incentives can promote collaboration, a downside is that individual members may perceive their contributions as less impactful or feel that rewards are not fairly distributed, potentially reducing motivation and productivity if not managed carefully.

Perceived value of benefits can increase when employers introduce flexible benefit packages, allowing employees to select benefits according to their personal needs and preferences. Flexibility and choice improve employee satisfaction and engagement, making benefits offering more relevant and valued than uniform, rigid packages.

One strategic consideration for designing employee benefits is the organization's stage of development. Startups, for example, might prioritize flexible benefits and growth opportunities, while mature organizations may focus on stability and comprehensive health coverage. Aligning benefits with organizational strategy and employee needs enhances value and effectiveness of reward systems.

References

• Kaufman, B. E. (2019). The Economics of Labor Markets. Routledge.
• Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2014). Compensation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• U.S. Department of Labor. (1938). Fair Labor Standards Act.
• Graham, L. (2020). Employee Benefits and Compensation. CRC Press.
• Bratton, J., & Gold, J. (2017). Human Resource Management Theory and Practice. Palgrave.
• Shaw, J. D., & Gupta, N. (2009). The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy, and Performance. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Helmig, B., Huber, R., & Leat, P. (2018). Strategic Compensation and Benefits. Springer Publishing.
• Ostergaard, C. (2012). Wage Setting, Labor Market Institutions, and Income Inequality. Journal of Economic Surveys.
• Anthony, W. P., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
• National Committee on Employment Policy. (2010). Trends in Employee Benefits Costs. U.S. Government Printing Office.