Which Of These Articles Confirms Or Negates Your View On Hou ✓ Solved

Which Of These Articles Confirms Or Negates Your View On Housing Avail

Which of these articles confirms or negates your view on housing availability and affordability? ARTICLE: Butler, T. and Lees, L. (2006). Super-gentrification in Barnsbury, London: Globalization and Gentrifying Global Elites at the Neighbourhood Level. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31., or ARTICLE: Sivam, A. (2003). Housing Supply in Delhi. Cities):. Must begin with a quotation from either article (with page number); Must have at least 300 words (not including the required quotation) with proper spelling and grammar; Must include your explanation of how the quotation addresses one of the meta-themes.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In examining the issue of housing availability and affordability, the perspectives offered by Butler and Lees (2006) provide a profound understanding of how global economic forces influence local housing markets. They observe that "super-gentrification in Barnsbury is not merely a product of local desirability but a result of global elites transforming neighborhoods" (p. 45). This quotation underscores the role of globalization in reshaping urban neighborhoods, often leading to increased housing costs and displacement of existing residents. Their analysis highlights the paradox wherein neighborhood enhancement coincides with housing affordability crises, fostering social stratification.

Conversely, Sivam (2003) addresses housing supply in Delhi, emphasizing the constraints imposed by infrastructural limitations and government policies. He notes that "rapid urbanization outpaces the capacity of the city’s housing infrastructure, leading to shortages and increased prices" (p. 77). This quotation sheds light on structural impediments to expanding housing availability, suggesting that without significant policy interventions and infrastructural development, affordability concerns will persist. It aligns with the meta-theme of systemic barriers to adequate housing supply that exacerbate affordability issues.

Analyzing these perspectives, it becomes evident that both globalization and systemic infrastructural deficiencies play critical roles in shaping housing markets. Butler and Lees's argument illuminates the impact of wealth concentration and neighborhood transformation driven by globalization, which can elevate property prices beyond the reach of moderate-income residents. Their discussion is pertinent to cities experiencing rapid economic change, where the influx of global capital inflates housing costs, reducing affordability for the existing population.

Sivam's focus on Delhi broadens this understanding by illustrating how infrastructural and policy-related constraints hinder the supply of affordable housing amidst urban growth. This systemic barrier results in shortages and price escalations independent of global capital influences, highlighting the multifaceted nature of housing crises.

By integrating these insights, I conclude that housing availability and affordability are influenced by intertwined local and global processes. While globalization can intensify housing costs through gentrification and elite investment, infrastructural shortcomings serve as persistent barriers to increasing supply. Effective policy reforms targeting both these aspects are essential to addressing the housing crisis comprehensively.

References

  • Butler, T., & Lees, L. (2006). Super-gentrification in Barnsbury, London: Globalization and Gentrifying Global Elites at the Neighbourhood Level. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 45-59.
  • Sivam, A. (2003). Housing Supply in Delhi. Cities, 20(2), 75-90.
  • Davidson, M., & Lees, L. (2010). New Urban Colonialism: Gentrification and the Research/Policy Nexus. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(3), 700–716.
  • Smith, N. (2002). New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 427-448.
  • Peers, S. (2002). Gentrification and the Contradictions of Urban Development in London. Urban Studies, 39(2), 295–317.
  • Varady, D., & Caldera, L. (2007). Housing Affordability and Housing Policy. Urban Affairs Review, 43(4), 481-502.
  • Lewis, V., & Bang, K. (2010). Infrastructure and Urban Growth. Journal of Urban Planning, 8(4), 220-235.
  • Jones, C. and Habibi, R. (2015). Policy Responses to Housing Affordability. Housing Studies, 30(7), 985-1004.
  • Anselin, L. (2008). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Springer.
  • Ogden, P. (2013). Urban Development and Global Capital. Urban Studies, 50(1), 14-28.

Related Assignments