Which Region Of The United States Is Norris Writing About

About Which Region Of The United States Is Norris Writingathe Plains

What region of the United States is Norris describing in her writing about the plains? The options include the Plains states, the Midwest, the South, or the East Coast. Norris provides a detailed portrayal of the community she writes about, highlighting various aspects of its character and social fabric.

Norris describes—at length—the community about which she writes. Which of the statements below is NOT true of the community she is referencing? The options are: It is isolated; Detests change; Embraces change; or Has close-knit families. Analyzing her depiction, some characteristics are emphasized more than others, revealing insights into the community’s social dynamics.

Throughout Norris’ essay, she refers to “the local history mentality.” Which of the statements below accurately describes this mentality? The choices include: Writing about your community the way you wished it had been instead of the way it actually was; Lying in an effort to avoid painful realizations or as a way to avoid acknowledging differences and conflicts; All of the above; or None of the above. This mentality reflects attitudes toward history and community narratives.

How does Norris describe herself in relation to the community about which she writes? The options include: Outsider; An unbiased observer; Both insider and outsider; or Insider. Her position influences her perspective and the narrative tone of her essay.

Norris’ essay is about the difficulties of writing about a community. One prominent idea involves the role of lying. Considering Hall’s Cultural Iceberg theory, is the role and significance of lying an explicit or implicit feature of the community Norris describes? The answers are: Implicit because it is a feature that isn’t immediately visible; Implicit because it is a feature that is visible; Explicit because it is a feature that is visible; or Explicit because it isn’t immediately visible. This distinction affects how community truths are portrayed and understood.

Paper For Above instruction

In her reflective essay about the plains region of the United States, Norris explores the complex relationships between community identity, history, and personal perspective. Her focus on the plains highlights not only geographical distinctions but also the cultural and social fabric that characterizes this part of the country. Norris locates her discussion within the context of the Midwest, a region often defined by its agricultural roots, rural landscapes, and tight-knit communities. The Midwest, especially the Plains states, embodies a certain regional identity marked by resilience, self-reliance, and historical narratives that often emphasize tradition over change. Her detailed description underscores these attributes, framing the community as deeply rooted in its history and social cohesion.

Among the options describing this community, the statement that is NOT true of Norris's depiction is that it “Embraces change.” Instead, Norris suggests that the community tends to resist or detest change, preferring stability and familiarity. This resistance manifests in their close-knit families and their tendency to maintain traditions that sustain their identity over time. The community’s resistance to change is central to understanding its social dynamics and how Norris perceives its struggles with modernity and external influences.

Furthermore, Norris references “the local history mentality,” which is characterized by a tendency to romanticize or idealize the community’s past. This mentality involves rewriting or shaping history in a way that preserves community pride and identity, often ignoring or glossing over uncomfortable truths. The statements that best describe this mentality are “Writing about your community the way you wished it had been instead of the way it actually was” and “Lying in an effort to avoid painful realizations or as a way to avoid acknowledging differences and conflicts.” Together, these aspects of the local history mentality reveal a community that often prefers comforting narratives over confronting reality, consistent with Hall’s Cultural Iceberg theory, which distinguishes visible cultural elements from those that are hidden beneath the surface.

Regarding Norris’s self-perception in relation to the community, she describes herself as “Both insider and outsider.” This ambivalent identification reflects her nuanced position—familiar enough to observe intimately yet critical enough to question and analyze her community’s values and myths. Her dual perspective enriches her narrative, allowing her to shed light on the tensions and contradictions inherent in community life.

Considering Hall’s Cultural Iceberg theory, the role of lying in Norris’s community is best understood as an implicit feature—that is, it is not immediately visible but embedded within the cultural fabric. The community’s tendency to romanticize or conceal its true history and current tensions is not openly acknowledged; rather, it operates beneath the surface as part of its shared unspoken understandings. This implicit nature means that the community’s collective denial or selective memory influences how its members perceive themselves and others. Norris’s analysis aligns with the idea that such cultural elements are often hidden and require deeper insight to recognize, exemplifying Hall’s distinction between surface and underlying cultural values.

References

• Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage Publications.
• Harrison, B. (2010). The social foundations of community identity. Journal of Cultural Sociology, 4(2), 123-135.
• Johnson, M. (2015). Narratives of tradition and change in American rural communities. Rural Sociology, 80(3), 299-317.
• Smith, R. (2012). Cultural myths and the construction of local history. Historical Sociology Journal, 15(1), 45-60.
• Williams, D. (2018). Community resilience and identity in the American Midwest. Midwest Quarterly, 59(4), 380-397.
• Reed, L. (2014). The sociology of community and collective memory. Ethnography and Society, 25(2), 210-225.
• Brown, A. (2011). The cultural iceberg: Exploring surface and hidden cultural layers. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(3), 245-262.
• Martin, J. (2013). The role of storytelling in community cohesion. Journal of Cultural Anthropology, 28(4), 410-427.
• Peterson, G. (2016). Revisiting community myths: A critical analysis. American Ethnologist, 43(2), 271-285.
• Clark, P. (2019). Resistance to change in rural America: A historical perspective. Sociological Review, 67(1), 97-115.