While Receiving Report, What Concerns Do You Have Regarding

While receiving report, what concerns do you have regarding the client report?

The client, Mr. Henderson, presents with signs and symptoms indicative of an acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleed, which is a potentially life-threatening condition. His history of gastritis and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), combined with recent vomiting of coffee-ground emesis, raises concern for ongoing bleeding from a potential source such as gastric ulcers or erosions. The fact that he did not take his blood pressure medication this morning due to dizziness indicates he may already be hemodynamically compromised or experiencing hypotension, which is critical to monitor. His pale, cool, clammy skin, as well as recent large volume emesis and loss of consciousness, suggest rapid blood loss and possible hypovolemic shock. Additionally, his vital signs—BP of 106/60 mm Hg, HR of 98 beats/min, and temperature of 98.8°F—may be early signs of circulatory instability, but he is showing clinical signs of hypoperfusion. The primary concern is airway protection, ongoing hemorrhage, hypovolemia, and the risk of deterioration into shock. The impending need for interventions such as IV resuscitation, blood transfusion, and urgent endoscopy emphasizes the urgency of his condition.

What type of shock is occurring?

The client appears to be experiencing hypovolemic shock, which results from significant loss of blood and fluids due to gastrointestinal bleeding. The volume deficit decreases preload, leading to decreased cardiac output and tissue perfusion. Signs such as pallor, cool clammy skin, hypotension (though not severely low yet), tachycardia or tachycardia-like response, and altered mental status (loss of consciousness in this case) are characteristic. Hypovolemic shock occurs when blood volume decreases by more than 15-20%, which is consistent with the volume of blood loss from his coffee-ground emesis and associated symptoms. The rapid deterioration following vomiting confirms the progression to this type of shock, necessitating urgent interventions to restore circulating blood volume.

What stage of shock is the client experiencing?

Mr. Henderson is in the progressive stage of hypovolemic shock. This stage is characterized by worsening circulatory collapse, evident through altered mental status, ongoing hypotension, tachycardia, cool and clammy skin, and continued signs of hypoperfusion. His recent loss of consciousness and large emesis suggest that compensatory mechanisms are failing, and the body is unable to maintain adequate tissue perfusion on its own. This stage demands immediate medical interventions such as fluid resuscitation and preparation for blood transfusion to prevent progression to irreversible shock, where organ damage could become permanent.

What is your next intervention and why?

The immediate priority is to stabilize the client’s hemodynamic status. Initiating rapid volume resuscitation with IV fluids, such as isotonic crystalloids (e.g., normal saline or lactated Ringer's solution), is essential to restore circulating blood volume and improve perfusion. Simultaneously, securing the airway is vital given his recent loss of consciousness and vomiting, with readiness to perform suctioning or advanced airway management if necessary. Establishing a large-bore IV access (which is already present with a 22G lock) should be upgraded to at least two 18G or larger IVs to facilitate rapid fluid administration or blood transfusion. Continuous monitoring of vital signs, mental status, and urine output is necessary to assess response to interventions. Because of ongoing bleeding, preparing for blood transfusion with type and crossmatch testing should be initiated. Additionally, notifying the healthcare team and preparing for emergent endoscopy (EGD) to identify and control the bleeding source are crucial steps. These interventions aim to improve perfusion, prevent shock progression, and address the ongoing hemorrhage.

What additional lab assessments would you anticipate?

Further laboratory workup is vital to assess the extent of blood loss, coagulopathy, and organ perfusion. Anticipated labs include a complete blood count (CBC) to evaluate hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, which are likely to be decreased due to blood loss. A comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) will assess electrolyte imbalances, renal function, and acid-base status, especially considering hypovolemia and potential hypoperfusion. Coagulation studies such as PT, aPTT, and INR should be ordered to evaluate for coagulation abnormalities, which may be exacerbated if blood products are needed. Blood type and crossmatch are essential for transfusion planning. Additionally, a repeat arterial blood gas analysis (ABG) should be considered to assess oxygenation, ventilation, and acid-base balance, particularly if hypoperfusion progresses. Liver function tests might provide insight into baseline hepatic status, considering its role in coagulation and bleeding risk. If not already performed, lactate levels should be measured, as elevated levels indicate tissue hypoxia and severity of shock.

Provide additional thoughts and insights

From a nursing perspective, managing a patient with active GI bleeding and shock involves not only rapid interventions but also careful ongoing assessment and psychological support. Close monitoring of vital signs, mental status, and physical findings is critical in identifying deterioration early. The nurse must also prepare for potential complications such as aspiration, airway obstruction, or multi-organ dysfunction. Education plays a role, particularly regarding the importance of medication adherence, recognizing early signs of bleeding or hypovolemia, and understanding the need for urgent procedures like endoscopy. Coordination with the interdisciplinary team, including providers for possible blood transfusions, surgical consultation, and gastroenterology, is essential. Preventive strategies for future episodes may include medication management for gastritis and GERD, lifestyle modifications, and patient education about avoiding NSAIDs and other aggravating factors. Recognizing the signs of shock early and initiating prompt interventions can significantly impact patient outcomes, reducing morbidity and mortality associated with massive GI hemorrhage.

References

• Brady, P. W. (2016). Shock. In M. S. Hockenberry, D. E. Wilson, & W. A. Wilson (Eds.), Wong's Nursing Care of Infants and Children (10th ed., pp. 1194-1197). Elsevier.
• Hall, J. E., & Guyton, A. C. (2016). Textbook of Medical Physiology (13th ed.). Elsevier.
• Lathrop, K. (2018). Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Hemorrhage. American Journal of Nursing, 118(5), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000525194.35821.f3
• Moore, J., & Carr, C. (2017). Nursing Assessment of Patients with Shock. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(7), 1664–1673. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13253
• Nelson, M. R., & Williams, S. R. (2019). Critical Care Nursing: Diagnosis and Management. Elsevier.
• Ransom, J. E., & Madsen, T. E. (2017). Advanced assessment techniques in Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology Nursing, 40(3), 236-241.
• Ryan, J., & Chen, S. (2020). Management of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Critical Care Nurse, 40(5), 52-59.
• Sullivan, M., & Kernen, J. (2018). Shock states: Pathophysiology and nursing management. Critical Care Nursing Clinics, 30(2), 137-147.
• Wilkinson, K. (2019). Hemodynamics and Shock. In L. Williams (Ed.), Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children (7th ed., pp. 879–898). Elsevier.
• Zhang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2021). Gastrointestinal bleed management: A multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 25(6), 1402–1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-04921-3