Who Says It Best Journal Review Please Read The Direc 023024
Who Says It Best Journal ReviewPlease Read The Directions Instruct
WHO SAYS IT BEST: JOURNAL REVIEW Please read the directions & instructions for this RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT to explore technics in research methods and resources? IN A PROFESSIONAL OPINION, ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIOS, WHICH JOURNAL REVIEW BEST, ACCURATELY REPRESENTS ADDRESSING THE REQUIREMENTS, SAMPLE ONE or SAMPLE TWO? Directions: Select a journal from a discipline that pertains to your specific research interests. Spend time in the library (or online) visiting the journal, reviewing it since its inception. BILLBOARED or ROLLINGSTONE MAGAZINE, WHICH are MUSIC THEMED will work here.
Consider the history, development, major players, subscription rates, publication information, acceptance/publication rates, style manual, editorial board, schools of contributors, kind of work contributed, what gets published, forums/ book reviews. Explore the current trends in topics. Who is the current editor, what is their term, their philosophy. Where is it being edited? Are there editorial prefaces?
What do they say? Spend some time running through or skimming the volumes of the journal. (Note: Set a time limit on browsing and reading and then manage your time. It is easy to be diverted from this task by reading articles of interest instead of browsing the entire journal.) Keep notes on significant changes you see over the years of the journal’s existence. Watch for changes in editorial boards, schools that the contributors or editors come from, topic changes, name changes of the journal itself, etc. Note specifically if a journal has a change in format such as adding a book review section, a forum section, or editor’s introductory remarks.
Pay attention to long-term trends. INSTRUCTIONS: PART I – Write a report that contains the following information. Note, most of this information could be obtained from the most recent issues. Journal name Call number Years of publication and volume numbers (note title changes, if any) Issues (quarterly? semi-annually?) Years available in our library (specify if on line volumes are available and where) Facts of publication (who owns/sponsors the journal, where is it published, cost of subscription) Current editor Current style manual Specifications for submissions (page limit, format (manuscript or electronic, etc.) Anything else you think is relevant or interesting. PART II - Analysis After completing your journal review, write a 2-3 page report that synthesizes and analyzes what you discovered. Your report should synthesize the content and content changes of the journal and identify the major trends that you discovered. ANSWERS!, SAMPLE ONE of TWO – FINAL DRAFTS – FINAL DRAFT SAMPLE #1 Journal Review ?? The rolling Stone is a famous biweekly magazine that was introduced in the American Magazine industry in 1967. This magazine was launched in San Francisco by Jann Wenner and Ralph Gleason. In its inception, the magazine was known for its captivating musical stories as well as political issues. However, the magazine is popularly known for its robust musical critique (Lippmann & Aldrich, 2016). Rolling Stone is published by Jann Wenner while its main music critique is Ralph Gleason. Currently, the subscription rate of rolling stone print magazine is $29.95 for 26 weeks a year. The subscription for the digital media is $34.95 for 26 weeks in a year (Rosenthal, 2014). In 1977, there were several changes in the company including relocation of its headquarters from San Francisco to New York. It started as a non-stapled black-ink print. However, the magazine has transformed into a modern color print. Nevertheless, Rolling Stone has maintained a small size for the magazine over the years. In 2000s, the magazine experienced a turbulent performance, but was salvaged by the two famous journalists, Michael Hastings and Matt Taibbi (Booth, 2014). Rolling Stone remains an unconventional debut issue in the American entertainment industry. As such, many individuals considered Rolling Stone, is a magazine while others considered it to be newspaper. It has transformed the rock and roll landscape in the United States. The magazine focused mostly on the famous musical personalities. Most people who were in the music and entertainment industry enjoyed the contents of the Rolling Stone (Lippmann & Aldrich, 2016). The Rolling Stone was not afraid from discussing politics and personalities. Although its mixed status included politics and social scandals in the US, most individuals made reference to the magazine when they needed factual information on various scandals. Most of its readers believe that it is one of the magazines giving the audience authentic content. It is enjoyable, interesting and accurate on most cases. It discusses some of the most coveted musicians and their contents. It brings close the festivals and events in the entertainment industry. While non-musicians may not see its contributions, the rock and roll world has appreciated the influence that Rolling Stone has made over the years (Lippmann & Aldrich, 2016). Rosenthal (2014), states that Rolling Stone has a “Reviews†section where reviews on personalities and music are discussed. This section is packed with accurate information on new music, albums, movies and music charts. Most entertainment-oriented individuals enjoy the reviews where they get valuable information on recent contents in the markets. Additionally, the magazine has a section known as “Last Page.†The “last page†section, discuses and individual in detail by explaining the recent occurrences, the recent contents and music done by the individual. For every edition, the magazine features an individual whose face is embedded on the front page of the magazine. The magazine has a message board in its newly launched websites where individuals can dispatch their messages. Rolling Stone also uses its magazine for the promotional purposes. The table of content page is used for promoting products to potential customers. This page gives detailed links that direct the readers to specific contents in other websites. Today, Rolling Stone is regarded as a community rather than just a magazine. It has thrived through challenges and severe criticism over years. Overall, the magazine is seen as an accurate bibliography on music, artists, movies and music charts around the globe (Lippmann & Aldrich, 2016). References Booth, S. (2014). The true adventures of the Rolling Stones . Chicago Review Press. Lippmann, S., & Aldrich, H. E. (2016). A rolling stone gathers momentum: Generational units, collective memory, and entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review , 41 (4), . Rosenthal, M. (2014). The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap by Matt Taibbi.
Paper For Above instruction
After reviewing the two samples of journal analysis, it becomes evident that Sample One offers a detailed and comprehensive examination of Rolling Stone magazine, whereas Sample Two centers on a music group called The New Groovement with a focus on subversive messages in music. When determining which review best aligns with the assignment instructions, the key is to evaluate how well each sample fulfills the criteria set forth in the research assignment guidelines.
The assignment emphasizes a thorough investigation of a specific journal—its history, development, publication details, editorial practices, trends, and significant changes over time. Sample One closely adheres to these guidelines by providing meticulous information about RollsStone’s publication history, ownership, editorial focus, and content evolution. The writer notes specific details such as its founding year, founders, publication frequency, format transitions, subscription costs, and major editorial shifts. The analysis also discusses how the magazine has changed its format, content priorities, and editorial leaderships, while offering insights into its cultural influence. The paper includes references to scholarly sources, demonstrating an academic approach.
In contrast, Sample Two discusses a music band and their subversive messaging but does not focus on the journal’s history, development, or publication specifics. Instead, it evaluates the content of a single song and its themes, which, while relevant to music analysis, does not fully meet the journal review assignment’s criteria. It lacks detailed information about the journal’s publication history, editorial policies, trends, and notable changes. Although it offers insights into subversive themes in music, it does not systematically analyze the journal as an institution over time.
Therefore, based on the criteria and detailed instructions provided, Sample One most accurately and comprehensively represents the requirements for a journal review. It demonstrates a clear understanding of the journal’s evolution, publication details, editorial context, and content trends, fulfilling the assignment’s expectations for an analytical and research-based evaluation.
References
- Booth, S. (2014). The true adventures of the Rolling Stones. Chicago Review Press.
- Lippmann, S., & Aldrich, H. E. (2016). A rolling stone gathers momentum: Generational units, collective memory, and entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 41(4).
- Rosenthal, M. (2014). The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap by Matt Taibbi.