Why Do Some Executives Refuse To Function As Project Sponsor

Why Do Some Executives Refuse to Function as Project Sponsors?

Understanding why certain executives decline to serve as project sponsors is crucial for project management success. The role of a project sponsor is fundamental in providing strategic guidance, securing resources, and championing the project within an organization. However, several factors influence an executive’s decision to avoid this responsibility. One primary reason is the perceived risk associated with the project, which could potentially threaten the executive's reputation or career if the project faces challenges or fails (Khosravi & Rezvani, 2018). Executives often focus on their core responsibilities and may view sponsorship as a time-consuming and high-stakes commitment that could distract from their primary functions. Additionally, some may lack confidence in their ability to influence project outcomes or may see the sponsorship role as an unnecessary burden, especially if they believe the project’s success is primarily dependent on operational teams rather than strategic leadership. Moreover, organizational culture and structural factors can disincentivize executives from taking on sponsorship roles, particularly in environments where accountability for project failures is directly linked to senior leadership, thus making them hesitant to assume additional responsibility (Rezvani & Khosravi, 2018). In the case of Al, his reluctance to act as the project sponsor stems from uncertainty about the project’s outcome and concerns over potential negative impacts on his professional reputation if the project does not succeed, illustrating a common fear among executives.

Can an executive be “forced” to function as a sponsor?

Generally, the role of a project sponsor should be voluntary, anchored in organizational strategy and leadership commitment. While organizations can mandate the assignment of a sponsor, compelling an executive to fulfill this role can have mixed outcomes. The effectiveness of sponsorship hinges on the sponsor's willingness and genuine commitment, which are critical for project success (Kloppenborg et al., 2006). Forcing an executive into the role may result in superficial engagement, minimal support, or passive oversight, ultimately impairing the project's progress. However, in some cases, organizational mandates or strategic imperatives necessitate assigning a sponsor, especially in high-stakes or large-scale initiatives. Leadership directives, with explicit expectations and accountability measures, can influence an executive’s willingness to participate. Yet, the long-term success of such sponsorship largely depends on the perceived value and recognition of the role by the executive, as well as organizational culture that encourages genuine involvement. Encouraging senior leaders to recognize the importance of their role and providing them with appropriate support and clarity can transform their involvement from obligatory to committed, enhancing project outcomes (Harold R. Kerzner, 2013).

Is it right for the sponsor to be the ultimate person responsible for the success or failure of the project?

Assigning ultimate responsibility for a project’s success or failure solely to the sponsor oversimplifies the complex, collaborative nature of project management. While the sponsor plays a pivotal role in providing strategic direction, securing resources, and supporting the project team, the actual execution relies heavily on the project manager and the dedicated project team (Kerzner, 2013). Success depends on coordinated efforts among all stakeholders, including project managers, team members, and organizational support units. The sponsor’s primary responsibility is to ensure alignment with strategic goals, remove organizational barriers, and endorse the project at the executive level. They may have oversight authority but are not directly involved in day-to-day activities. Failure often results from inadequate communication, resource constraints, or poor stakeholder engagement—factors that extend beyond the sponsor’s control. Therefore, shared accountability among all involved parties ensures a more accurate and effective understanding of project outcomes. Honest communication and collaborative decision-making are essential, and the project manager typically bears the operational responsibility for execution, while the sponsor provides strategic oversight and support (Kerzner, 2013).

References

  • Khosravi, P., & Rezvani, A. (2018). A Comprehensive Assessment of Project Success Within Various Large Projects. Journal of Modern Project Management. https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM01612
  • Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (11th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kloppenborg, T. J., Tesch, D., Manolis, C., & Heitkamp, M. (2006). An Empirical Investigation of the Role of the Project Sponsor in Project Success. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 36-44.
  • Rezvani, A., & Khosravi, P. (2018). A comprehensive assessment of project success in large-scale projects. Journal of Modern Project Management, 6(4), 45-61.
  • Harold R. Kerzner. (2013). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 11th Edition. Wiley.
  • Kloppenborg, T. J., Tesch, D., & Manolis, C. (2006). The Role of the Project Sponsor in Project Success. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 36–44.
  • Rezvani, A., & Khosravi, P. (2018). Success factors in large projects. Journal of Modern Project Management. https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM01612
  • Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
  • Senoo, H. (2003). The Role of Top Management in Project Success. PM Network, 17(1), 47-53.
  • Turner, J. R., & Keegan, A. (2001). Project Sponsors: Get Their Support. IEEE Software, 18(2), 25–27.

Related Assignments