Why Is Mars Cold From What You Learned In Class ✓ Solved

From what you have learned from this class: Why is Mars cons

From what you have learned from this class: Why is Mars considered so inhospitable? What would be needed to ensure humans could survive on Mars? In particular, where would we get our food, our oxygen, our water and our energy? If you were tasked with sending people to Mars, give a time-line of how they would get there, what would they bring, how long would they stay and what advice you would give anyone who wanted to go?

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

The dream of sending humans to Mars has endured because Mars presents a clear successor to Earth for exploration and potential long-term presence. Yet the plan hinges on solving a set of intertwined challenges: extreme climate, a thin carbon dioxide–dominant atmosphere, radiation exposure, resource scarcity, and the logistical complexities of a long-duration mission. To design a credible mission, we must anchor our reasoning in what is known about Mars’s environment, the biology of human life support, and the engineering of closed-loop systems. The fundamental question is not merely “can we get there?” but “how would we live once we arrive?” This paper synthesizes core lessons from planetary science, life-support engineering, and mission design to outline why Mars is inhospitable, what resources are essential for survival (food, oxygen, water, energy), and a feasible time-line for a crewed mission, including what they would bring, how long they would stay, and practical guidance for future explorers (NASA 2023; Zubrin & Wagner 1996).

Why Mars is inhospitable

Mars is a cold and arid world with a tenuous atmosphere of primarily carbon dioxide and surface pressures less than 1% of Earth’s. Average surface temperatures swing dramatically, from about -125°C at night near the poles to roughly 20°C in the equatorial daytime, with substantial regional and seasonal variability. Radiation exposure is significantly higher than on Earth due to the thin atmosphere and lack of a global magnetic field (NASA Mars Exploration Program Overview, 2023). The global dust environment can affect solar power availability and air-filtration reliability. Perchlorates in the regolith pose additional health concerns if ingested or inhaled, complicating any plans for in-situ resource processing or farming (NASEM, 2018). These factors combine to create a hostile environment for unprotected human life, requiring robust protective measures, reliable life support, and substantial habitat shielding.

Beyond the surface, the journey itself imposes physiological and psychological demands: long-duration microgravity-analog exposure during transit, demands on metabolic balance, and the need for continuous supply chains or effective on-site production. A credible Mars mission must therefore integrate destination environmental mitigation with resilient life-support and resource-management systems that can operate with high autonomy on the surface (Zubrin & Wagner, 1996; NASA ISRU references, 2022).

Essential survivability needs: food, oxygen, water, and energy

Food on Mars cannot rely on Earth resupply indefinitely. A sustainable approach envisions closed-loop agricultural capabilities that can tolerate Martian conditions and recycle nutrients. Hydroponic or aeroponic systems with appropriate lighting can support a diet that balances calories, protein, fats, and micronutrients. Crop selection would emphasize crops with high yield per square meter, rapid harvest cycles, and minimal freshwater use, coupled with recycling of wastewater and crop residues. Algae and cyanobacteria could supplement nutrition and help recycle carbon, while modular growth units would be designed for resilience against equipment failures (NASA ISRU concepts; NASA 2023).

Oxygen must be generated consistently for crew respiration. On Mars, this can be accomplished by splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen via electrolysis and by reclaiming oxygen from carbon dioxide through Sabatier or similar processes as part of an ISRU loop. A robust system would integrate electrolysis with CO2 reduction to maintain a stable atmospheric composition inside habitat modules while enabling additional life-support mass savings by producing atmospheric oxygen on-site (NASA ISRU; Zubrin & Wagner, 1996; NASEM, 2018).

Water is essential for drinking, food production, hygiene, and cooling. Martian ice deposits, polar caps, and subsurface reservoirs combined with reclaimed wastewater and atmosphere-derived water vapor would be managed through distillation, condensation, and recycling loops. Efficient water management and purification systems are critical to reduce the mass that must be transported from Earth (NASA ISRU; NASA MEP, 2023).

Energy powers life support, farming, processing, mobility, and science. Solar photovoltaic arrays are a likely baseline energy source, given Mars’s distance from the Sun and the need for renewable, scalable power. In regions with dust storms or for extended missions, compact nuclear options or hybrid systems could provide baseline power with redundancy. Energy storage, efficiency in power electronics, and heat management are essential to keep life-support hardware, growth chambers, and habitat climate control within safe operating temperatures (ESA Aurora program context; SpaceX Starship references; NASA energy concepts; 2016–2020). In short, Mars requires reliable energy infrastructure to sustain all critical systems (NASA 2023; SpaceX 2020).

In-situ resource utilization (ISRU) and habitat design

A central design principle is ISRU: producing vital resources on Mars rather than importing everything from Earth. ISRU strategies include extracting water from ice, splitting water to release oxygen, and converting CO2 into usable reagents or fuels. The Sabatier reaction and water-gas shift reactions are among the approaches proposed to convert Martian CO2 and hydrogen into methane fuel and water, enabling return propulsion or energy storage and reducing the mass that must be launched from Earth. These capabilities are paired with habitat shielding and construction using Martian regolith, which can reduce radiation exposure and thermal loads (NASA ISRU; Zubrin & Wagner, 1996; NASEM, 2018).

Habitat architecture would emphasize modular, redundant life-support loops, autonomous maintenance, and radiation protection, potentially incorporating subsurface or lava-tube habitats. Surface systems would include agricultural bays optimized for Mars gravity and atmospheric conditions, with environmental controls, airlocks, and robust waste-management cycles. The design goal is to achieve resilience against component failures and to minimize Earth-supplied consumables over time (NASA MEP; ESA Aurora context; NRC/NASEM references, 2018).

Mission timeline and architecture

A plausible architecture for a crewed Mars mission involves multiple phases: pre-deployed robotic assets to build out a surface outpost and ISRU infrastructure; a capable transit window (roughly every 26 months for near-optimal transfer costs) enabling a flight time on the order of six to nine months with current or near-future propulsion concepts; a surface stay that begins with a short reconnaissance phase, followed by longer-term habitation; and a return segment timed to align with the next favorable launch window (NASA MEP; Zubrin & Wagner, 1996). Initial crews might stay on the order of 12–24 months to accumulate meaningful data on habitability, with potential extensions as outpost autonomy improves (NASA 2023; SpaceX 2020; NRC/NASEM 2018).

What would crews bring? They would transport core life-support infrastructure, seed stock for crops, microbial cultures for intensive recycling, spare parts for critical systems, and tools for habitat maintenance. Transport mass would be balanced against ISRU outputs to minimize Earth-supplied mass while maintaining safety margins. Mission planning must account for psychological well-being, medical readiness, and emergency escape options if ISRU or habitat systems underperform (NASA 2023; Zubrin & Wagner, 1996; ESA Aurora context).

Advice for would-be Mars explorers

For anyone considering Mars, the most important guidance is to adopt a design mindset oriented toward redundancy, autonomy, and long-term sustainability. Prepare for life-support contingency planning, secure reliable energy and water loops, and cultivate skills in closed-loop agriculture, robotics maintenance, and medical readiness. Understand that Mars requires a systems-level approach: you cannot separate transport from habitat, from energy, from food, or from health. The mission’s safety envelope depends on robust testing on Earth, on the Moon, and in orbital platforms before attempting a sustained surface presence (NASA 2023; NASEM 2018).

Conclusion

Colonizing Mars remains a formidable enterprise, but it is not incoherent with long-term human goals if approached with rigorous systems engineering, credible ISRU, and a staged mission architecture. The inhospitable environment demands a holistic solution that integrates food production, oxygen regeneration, water recycling, and energy provisioning within resilient habitat designs. A realistic time-line balances propulsion advances, launch windows, and on-site resource generation to enable sustainable presence rather than one-off visits. As research progresses, the iterative refinement of life-support loops, ISRU capabilities, and habitat protection will determine whether Mars becomes a second home for humanity or remains a compelling but distant proving ground for exploration (NASA 2023; Zubrin & Wagner, 1996; NASEM 2018).

References

  1. Zubrin, R., & Wagner, R. (1996). The Case for Mars: The Plan to Settle the Red Planet. New York, NY: Free Press.
  2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Pathways to Exploration: Rationales and Approaches for Mars Exploration. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2023). Mars Exploration Program Overview. https://mars.nasa.gov/mep/
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2022). In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU). https://www.nasa.gov/isru
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2014). Design Reference Mission 5.0. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/
  6. SpaceX. (2020). Starship. https://www.spacex.com/starship/
  7. European Space Agency. (2016). Aurora Programme. https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Human_Spaceflight/ESA_and_the_Aurora_Programme
  8. NASA Mars Exploration Program. (2019). Mars and Human Exploration. https://mars.nasa.gov/mep/
  9. NASA. (2013). ISRU Technologies and Mars Resource Utilization. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/
  10. NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). (2011). Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the Decade 2013-2022. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/

Related Assignments