Why Is The Concept Of Family Health Important? Consider The ✓ Solved

Why is the concept of family health important? Consider the

Why is the concept of family health important? Consider the various strategies for health promotion. How does a nurse determine which strategy would best enable the targeted individuals to gain more control over, and improve, their health?

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

The family is the primary social unit that shapes health behaviours, access to resources, and responses to illness across the life course. Understanding family health is therefore essential for effective health promotion and nursing practice. This paper explains why family health matters, reviews principal strategies for health promotion, and outlines a practical, evidence-informed approach nurses can use to select the best strategy to enable targeted individuals and families to gain greater control over, and to improve, their health.

Why family health is important

Family health matters because families influence behaviours, provide caregiving and social support, shape health beliefs, and determine resource allocation for nutrition, housing, and healthcare (Wright & Leahey, 2013). The socio-ecological perspective shows how proximal settings such as family operate within broader systems (community, policy) to affect health outcomes (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). Addressing family health can reduce health inequalities by targeting upstream determinants (Marmot, 2005) and by leveraging family-level interventions that are cost-effective and sustainable compared with solely individual-focused measures (WHO, 1978).

Major strategies for health promotion

Health promotion strategies are diverse but can be organised into complementary categories:

  • Health education and skills development: Programs to increase knowledge, self-care skills and health literacy (Nutbeam, 2000).
  • Behaviour change interventions: Motivational interviewing, goal-setting and reinforcement to support health behaviour change (Rollnick et al., 2008).
  • Health protection and prevention: Immunization, screening, and environmental safety measures that reduce risk exposure (WHO, 1986).
  • Community development and empowerment: Building community capacity, peer support, and participatory approaches to increase control over determinants of health (CDC, 2019).
  • Policy and structural interventions: Advocacy for policies (e.g., housing, income supports) that shape the social determinants of health (Marmot, 2005).

Each strategy targets different levels of influence (individual, family, community, structural) and can be combined into multi-level interventions consistent with the Ottawa Charter’s emphasis on enabling people to increase control over their health (WHO, 1986).

How nurses determine the best strategy

Nurses select strategies through a systematic decision process integrating assessment, theoretical framing, evidence, and partnership with families. Key steps include:

  1. Comprehensive family assessment: Use structured family assessment tools (e.g., Calgary Family Assessment Model, Wright & Leahey) to appraise family structure, roles, communication, strengths, and stressors (Wright & Leahey, 2013).
  2. Context analysis: Map social determinants, cultural norms, resources and barriers using an ecological lens (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Marmot, 2005). Determine readiness to change and health literacy levels (Nutbeam, 2000).
  3. Evidence appraisal and fit: Use evidence-based frameworks (e.g., PARIHS) to judge whether an intervention is effective, feasible, and acceptable in the local context (Kitson et al., 1998).
  4. Collaborative planning and empowerment: Co-design interventions with family members and relevant stakeholders using participatory methods to ensure relevance, ownership and sustainability (CDC, 2019).
  5. Implementation strategy selection: Match the intervention level to assessed needs—education and skills for low knowledge; motivational interviewing for ambivalence; community development where structural barriers predominate; policy advocacy for systemic determinants (Rollnick et al., 2008; WHO, 1986).
  6. Evaluation and adaptation: Monitor outcomes, solicit feedback, and adapt using iterative cycles to improve effectiveness and equity (Kitson et al., 1998).

This approach balances individual behaviour change techniques with broader social and environmental strategies to maximize impact.

Application: Choosing an effective strategy—an example

Consider a family with a parent who has type 2 diabetes, low health literacy, limited income, and constrained access to healthy foods. A nurse’s assessment reveals knowledge gaps, ambivalence about lifestyle change, and structural barriers such as food deserts. Based on this profile, a combined strategy is most appropriate: targeted health education to build knowledge and practical skills (meal planning on a budget), motivational interviewing to increase readiness for behavior change (Rollnick et al., 2008), and community-level interventions (linkage to food assistance, local policy advocacy for fresh-food access) to address social determinants (Marmot, 2005; CDC, 2019). Using PARIHS, the nurse evaluates evidence for such multi-component interventions and adapts to local resources and family preferences (Kitson et al., 1998).

Role of theory and models in decision-making

Theoretical models guide selection. Pender’s Health Promotion Model highlights factors (perceived benefits, self-efficacy) influencing behaviour and suggests interventions that enhance motivation and skills (Pender et al., 2015). Family systems theories help nurses target relational dynamics and caregiving patterns (Wright & Leahey, 2013). The Ottawa Charter and Alma-Ata remind practitioners to combine personal skills development with supportive environments and primary care integration (WHO, 1986; WHO, 1978).

Practical considerations and ethical issues

Nurses must consider cultural competence, consent, equity, resource constraints, and possible unintended harms. Interventions should respect family autonomy, use culturally appropriate communication, and prioritize equity by focusing on those with greatest need (Nutbeam, 2000; Marmot, 2005).

Conclusion

Family health is central to population well-being because families shape behaviours and access to determinants of health. Effective nursing requires matching assessment findings to evidence-based strategies across individual, family and community levels. Using structured family assessment, theoretical models, collaborative planning, and implementation frameworks (e.g., PARIHS), nurses can choose and adapt strategies—education, behaviour-change techniques, community empowerment, and policy action—that most enable targeted individuals and families to gain control over their health and improve outcomes.

References

  • World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. First International Conference on Health Promotion; Ottawa, 21 November 1986. Geneva: WHO; 1986.
  • Pender NJ, Murdaugh CL, Parsons MA. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. 7th ed. Pearson; 2015.
  • Wright LM, Leahey M. Nurses and Families: A Guide to Family Assessment and Intervention. 7th ed. F.A. Davis; 2013.
  • Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press; 1979.
  • Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1099–1104.
  • Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International. 2000;15(3):259–267.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Community Guide—What Works to Promote Health. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2019.
  • Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence-based practice: a conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care. 1998;7(3):149–158.
  • Rollnick S, Miller WR, Butler CC. Motivational Interviewing in Health Care: Helping Patients Change Behavior. Guilford Press; 2008.
  • World Health Organization. Declaration of Alma-Ata. International Conference on Primary Health Care; Alma-Ata, USSR, 6–12 September 1978. Geneva: WHO; 1978.