Why Leaders Fail - Robby Colbert, Saint Leo University

Why Leaders Fail Robby Colbert Saint Leo University July 23, 2014

This paper examines the reasons why leaders in organizations fail to act or lead effectively, especially during critical moments. It discusses the various factors that contribute to leadership failure, including fear, lack of training, information overload, and failure to adapt to changing environments. It also explores different leadership styles, such as authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire, and how their application influences leadership success or failure. The importance of decisiveness, assessing risks accurately, and avoiding analysis paralysis are emphasized as crucial for effective leadership.

The paper reviews real-world examples, including a tragic police operation in Newport News, VA, where misjudgment and failure to lead properly resulted in a officer’s death and organizational repercussions. It highlights that ineffective leaders often neglect to follow established rules, neglect to gather sufficient information, or become paralyzed by excessive data, and underscores the necessity of making informed, timely decisions. Leaders like Colin Powell are cited as exemplars of making difficult but necessary decisions based on sound judgment and risk assessment, thereby illustrating core traits of successful leadership in challenging circumstances.

Paper For Above instruction

Leadership is a fundamental aspect of organizational success, yet many leaders fail due to various psychological, physiological, and situational factors. The core attributes of leadership—guidance, influence, and decision-making—are often compromised when leaders succumb to fear, indecisiveness, or information overload. Understanding why leaders fail requires an exploration of leadership styles, behavioral tendencies, and real-world examples that demonstrate how poor leadership impacts organizations and communities.

Leadership styles have profound implications on organizational outcomes. Lewin, Lippitt, and White’s (1939) categorization of authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire leadership provides a framework to analyze leadership effectiveness. The authoritarian style, characterized by unilateral decision-making, may be effective in crisis situations where quick action is necessary but can also lead to isolation and failure if overused. Conversely, the democratic style, which involves stakeholder input, fosters engagement and shared responsibility, increasing the likelihood of successful leadership. The laissez-faire style, often associated with inaction or neglect, can be particularly detrimental in high-stakes environments like law enforcement, as it signals weakness or ineffectiveness (Swanson, Territo, & Taylor, 2012).

Fear is a significant factor that contributes to leadership failure. Leaders may avoid making tough decisions due to fear of repercussions or personal failure. For example, in law enforcement, the case of the Newport News police operation illustrates how poor leadership and decision-making can have fatal consequences. During a police operation targeting pizza delivery robberies, a hastily designed plan led to the death of Officer Rutherford, highlighting the dangers of inadequate planning and leadership neglect. The subsequent internal investigation revealed errors in judgment and a failure to adapt, leading to organizational resignations and loss of confidence in leadership (Robby Colbert, 2014).

Another critical factor is information overload or analysis paralysis. Leaders often face vast amounts of data and must discern relevant information promptly. Colin Powell’s leadership philosophy advocating for acting when there is a 40-70% probability of success emphasizes the importance of timely action over delayed hesitation. Waiting for perfect information can be detrimental, as delays may result in missed opportunities or escalation of crises (Harari, 1996). Effective leaders balance data analysis with intuitive judgment, recognizing when sufficient information exists to act decisively.

Leadership failure also stems from neglecting established rules, defending subordinates prematurely, or inaction during crises. Such behavior can undermine organizational credibility and erode trust. Leaders must demonstrate moral courage and decisiveness, especially during organizational or societal crises. The emphasis on leading from the front, exemplified by figures like Colin Powell, underscores the importance of integrity, decisive action, and accountability in leadership. Leaders who are hesitant or avoid confronting difficult decisions risk failure and loss of confidence among followers.

In conclusion, leadership failure is often rooted in fear, indecisiveness, poor risk assessment, or a failure to adapt. Effective leaders must be willing to face difficult choices, gather appropriate information, and act decisively. They should cultivate the courage to lead from the front, exemplify ethical standards, and learn from the mistakes of others. By doing so, leaders can guide their organizations through complex, turbulent environments and achieve sustained success.

References

• Colbert, R. (2014). Why Leaders Fail. Saint Leo University.
• Harari, O. (1996). Leadership paradigms and decision-making. Management Review.
• Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of leadership in small groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 271-299.
• Swanson, C. C., Territo, L., & Taylor, R. W. (2012). Police Administration: Structures, Processes, and Behavior. Pearson.
• Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson.
• Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industry, Military, and Educational Practice. New York: Routledge.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
• Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait-based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 6-16.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that Gets Results. Harvard Business Review.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on trust, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.